Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

land ahoy....landround (LDR)     

CAPT BLIGH - 17 Jul 2003 17:01

Jumped into this bullet proof little number today, mind you its had an incredible run, so I might have missed the big rise. Still if they keep using large chunks of cash to buy shares for the Employee Trust it seems like a no brainer. Anyway adding these to my new "safe" portfolio with ELECO PTI and CKN

ajren - 14 Jun 2004 17:45 - 16 of 35

Morgan Stanley deal explains a lot.
rgds aj

beaufort1 - 15 Jun 2004 13:36 - 17 of 35

Good solid director purchase today at 225p should help to steady the ship.

ajren - 15 Jun 2004 17:21 - 18 of 35

Morgan Stanley = success.I think so in this case.
rgds aj

tompeck - 21 Jun 2004 11:32 - 19 of 35

+2.60 and climbing, aj. Nice to see it recovering.

beaufort1 - 21 Jun 2004 14:16 - 20 of 35

Yes it'll recover, but probably not as far as 375 or whatever. It shows poor judgement on the management's part that they made such a major error. What's to say it won't happen again?

Kivver - 22 Jun 2004 10:58 - 21 of 35

shares mag says its a knock back but nothing to stop it doing well in the future (but they would say that woundn't they).

The Oxman - 19 Jan 2005 11:57 - 22 of 35

a little while ago shares magazine suggested a run to 360-380p area was possible given resumption of encouraging trading and chart recovery - 8p ex div now out of the way and AGM due end of Jan so fingers crossed - sub 10x rating looks low to me given where its historically traded. should be at least 20% upside from 280p levels - I like the story and some yield/chartrecovery to go for - any views out there?

talltalk - 19 Jan 2005 18:01 - 23 of 35

The Oxman - 21 Jan 2005 13:14 - 24 of 35

some modest buying starting ahead of AGM statement at end of next week - should break above 300p methinks - anyone else watching this one?

The Oxman - 18 Feb 2005 15:28 - 25 of 35

agm delayed to Feb 28th - shares look to be rallying ahead of this now - 300p level now support - so could finally see our run to 360p. any other holders out there?

The Oxman - 23 Feb 2005 12:06 - 26 of 35

good positive agm today and shares up - ready for their run to 360p or better I hope - statement is brief but reads well - hopefully any upgrades on half year will provide the next big push. any other views out there? very quiet board.

The Oxman - 13 Apr 2005 11:18 - 27 of 35

shares have held stable around 350p for a while next push higher only a matter of time now - move back above 400p now a real possibility.

The Oxman - 05 May 2005 12:10 - 28 of 35

hit big time by small cap sell off - great opportunity now at 280p

malawi - 02 Aug 2006 09:57 - 29 of 35

Check this one out...2 stakebuilders and low cap.Tight market. Skies the limit IMHO

hrfulleruk - 02 Aug 2006 12:21 - 30 of 35

Moxon,director,bought 100,000 yesterday and now owns 7.5%.
These are down from 300p and now just 35p.I agree;great potential.

hrfulleruk - 14 Oct 2007 11:42 - 31 of 35

Lots of big trades going through.Poised for take off at 18p.

hangon - 15 Nov 2007 17:53 - 32 of 35

Can anyone say why the huge collapse in 2005?
Sorry it wasn't on my watch-list and the above posts seems to avoid mentioning anything untoward.
It can't have been the oil-price, or additional security reducing passenger numbers - can it?
Hope someone knows . . .

hrfulleruk - 16 Nov 2007 10:04 - 33 of 35

Accounting irregularities.More recently they had a large placing at 20 pence that has diluted the equity.

hangon - 25 Jul 2008 10:13 - 34 of 35

Thanks hrfulleruk, today sees 8p . . . and a News release ( Not RNS - why?) that losses may be greater than last year's "exceptionals" - -er, so they were only exceptional by being smaller. . . . . Grr.
I don't hold - always thinking they were rather expensive for something that is really corporate hospitality - a grey area for me being close to ....... Still different strokes, etc. but I must say I prefer a company with an actual product, satisfies a need etc . . . This Co. appears to rely upon winning contracts - and in these times of cutbacks...I guess expensive promotions can be dropped, just spending a little less with a slap-up meal for clients.

canada1 - 25 Jul 2008 15:00 - 35 of 35

I had them for the cheap ferry tickets to Ireland, which have turned out to be very expensive now...doh!!
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Register now or login to post to this thread.