http://www.regentherapeutics.com/regen

Consider a company with a market cap of around 10 million which could well in the future be generating revenue well in excess of that figure every year. Interested then read on and DYOR on Regen Therapeutics.

For some time now I have been a shareholder of RGT who have been working with a patented product Colostrinin as a treatment for Alzheimers. Tests so far would seem to indicate that it is a success and they are currently refining a pharmaceutical product.

Meantime they are also pushing forward on the nutraceutical front as tests have shown positive results in respect of mild cognitive disorders (memory loss etc). Further research is being carried out regarding other major illnesses. As at mid 2007 a launch is scheduled in the US for Q4 and there are rumours of an earlier launch in Australia possibly imminent based on the fact that adverts are already starting to appear see:- http://www.quantumevolution.com.au/oscommerce/index.php

They have also acquired a contract research organisation which should mean that research money for clinical trials that had previously been spent will now be kept inside the group.

February 2006 has seen Regen acquire the rights, following a feasibility study, in respect of other uses for a well known drug (Zolpidem) that has undergone phase 2 clinical trials where results are expected around August 2007. The new use relates to the positive effects that have been seen when treating stroke victims with the drug. There has been a lot of press interest which a web search should reveal.

An interview with the chairman (Percy Lomax) in the summer of 2004 talked of a nutraceutical product producing royalty payments of 10% on a possible 100 million sales per annum. The pharmaceutical version which also requires a licensing partner will if successful have projected sales of 1-5 billion again which would generate royalty payments to Regen. I leave you to contemplate just how high the share price would be if this were the case but suffice to say it will be many many times what it is now.

Acquisition (Oct 2004) of Guildford Clinical Pharmacology unit demonstrates not only that they are progressive and expanding but also thinking strategically for GCPUL being a research based company no doubt Regen can now keep such costs within the group whereas before testing had to be paid for elsewhere. This acquisition also means that they have revenue and are therefore no longer a "virtual" company.

A share issue in July 2007 means that they should now have funds in hand to take them through to cash generation. Hopefully this means we have seen the last of the issues excepting any used by way of acquiring profitable companies.

The North America link is an interesting one as perhaps in readiness for the launch of Colostrinin out there Regen set up an ADR programme which became effective in March 2005. ADR's ( American Depositary Receipts) are a way for US investors to buy shares in UK companies. In Regen's case one ADR is equivalent to 200 Regen UK shares so when an ADR is purhased the Bank of New York will buy the proportionate number of UK shares and convert them into ADR's for the investor. At present this is not a factor however with the launch of Colostrinin out there if successful it may mean that US investors will want to be involved in the company and that will have a direct positive impact on our share price. In the US Colostrum (from which Colostrinin is produced )is already a recognised and popular health product and so demand should be good.

So all in all exciting times ahead. There can be few shares around that offer the potential of this one although as always DYOR and good luck with your investments whatever you decide here.

I f I can I most certainly will, but if in volves a restriction on my right to my opinion, then obviously I would have to refuse as there is so muchrubbish talked about this share it coulod mislead others into thinking its going places and clearl its not.

Expansion would call for further dilution.

This company need a better quality management. I know I held it for about a year. Watched it rise on a bag full of empty promises that came to nothing and then dive back.

That said I sold at the top and I did make a few bob out of it and will buy back again if I see a chance of the SP riing maybe in 2009-

Puffed-up, self-important time-waster.

Good to have balance. As for expansion this would only come if the sales of Colostrinin nutra are greater than the 2 million units that have so far been agreed for Sterling to supply. This is possible based on the initial response and communication from one of the sellers in Australia that orders have quadrupled in the last couple of days. However if 2 million units (30 days supply) are sold at what is currently 25 each so 50 million and Regen get their royalties then there should be no need for more cash as they should have it in income.

In terms of expansion of the marketing operation this doesn't cost Regen anything as it is down to Metagenics etc.

It is quite understandable that people should be a little jaundiced with the performance of the SP and the calls for cash over the past few years but the fact is that the company is still here when many others have fallen along the way and they are actually at the stage of launching a product which many thought would never happen. To move from being a Blue Sky bio to an income generating and hopefully soon a profit making business is the transition that long term holders have waited for patiently and hopefully will be rewarded accordingly. In hindsight we'd have been best to wait until now to buy rather than averaging down from higher levels but hindsight's a wonderful thing.

queen1 - 05 Jul 2007 20:13 - 161 of 162
Puffed-up, self-important time-waster.

Correct!! but you forgot to add----with a knack of calling 'em right.

I will come back a year from now and without a signifcant market penitration the SP will be as dead as it is today.

You want a pharma THEN buy MLR the next six months will be brilliant---anD remeMber you heard it here for----FREE.

queen1

He lost a fortune on BKE...but he refuses to admit it.

Yes..he is a self-important time waster and should be banned..

Still harping on. Have you not got enough on your plate worring about the falling COH?

I have asked you to prove your rantings about BKE as I keep telling you.you always manage to leave the dood open for me to come back with--I WOULD NOT TOUCH ANYTHING THAT WORTHINGTON IS INVOLVED IN YOU WOULD BE MAD TO DO SO. DIGGLE INVESTMENTS SEEMS TO BE GETTING THE CREAM.

COH down tomorrw RGT AS STAGNANT AS EVER.

Have a REALLY GREAT RESTFUL NIGHT AS TOMORROW WILL PROVE FRUSTRATING FOR YOU BOTH.

ps how the hell can you lose a fortune on BKE its a penny dreadful like all Worthigtons dabblings.

If for example one held 100000000 you would only be talking a few grand, 10K at best.

YOU REALLY ARE AN IDIOT...100,000,000(100million) is more than 10K.

YUO SHOULD BE BANNED...ABSOLUTE IDIOT.

Not at the 1p price the MMs offer for large sales of this dog share, it is not! Why not check these things out before gobbing emptily!

Far too many shares in issue whats need is a consolidation to give the company a better feel.

Chaps dont miss the MLR boat if you can.

Get in now before it flies

I'm glad my summary was correct. But haven't you got better things to do with your time in Devon than bitcing about a share you don't even own?!

Hi Queen not really as I have retired now. I look at all shares with the aim of trying to call them right.

You woud have done well if you had bought MLR WHEN I FIRST SUGGESTED IT TO YOU.

I have managed to "Puff" up my portfolio this week

Have a great day.

queen1

This insect should be banned by Ian.

Email Ian and voice your opinions and join the many other posters who have complained about him.

Now whats the matter Mr Hasbeener my prediction upsetting you?

Now if we are to revert to the school yard proactice of name calling please get it right---ITS MR INSECT PLEASE!

Queen1 I trust you bought MLR.

ps I would leave hasbeener alone to run to teachersome things never change and there are always a few in ever classroom.

You stupid old sod, you've never personally recommended anything to me. Oh I'm sorry, IT SEEMS THAT I HAVE TO SHOUT LIKE YOU DO TO MAKE MYSELF HEARD. IS IT SWITCHED ON?

queen1

Email Ian...this is abuse.

COME COME COME MY DEAR QUEEN I ONE-A STUPID OLD SOD i MAY WELL BE BUT I DID SAY THIS TO YOU:-

David10B - 05 Jul 2007 21:14 - 163 of 176

queen1 - 05 Jul 2007 20:13 - 161 of 162
Puffed-up, self-important time-waster.

Correct!! but you forgot to add----with a knack of calling 'em right.

I will come back a year from now and without a signifcant market penitration the SP will be as dead as it is today.

You want a pharma THEN buy MLR the next six months will be brilliant---anD remeMber you heard it here for----FREE.


DID YOU FORGET TO BUY OR WHAT AS IT WAS A TAD CHEAPER WHEN I "PERSONALLY RECOMMENDED" THAT TO YOU.

OH YES TODAY'S PRICE WILL LOOK EVEN CHEAPER NEXT WEEK!

IT WILL BE CHEAPER NEXT WEEK...YOU ARE CORRECT.

look cheaper you fool!