Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


bhunt1910 - 18 Apr 2006 09:49 - 16014 of 27111

JJS - your comment was rather tempting fate !!!

Tonyrelaxes - 18 Apr 2006 10:28 - 16015 of 27111

JJS probably saw this on another BB. The poster is in all likelyhood PM1 :-))

Gary H - 17 Apr'06 - 20:04 - 62035 of 62040

Howard has been in the USA since late last week, possibilities of USA news next week have thus increased :)

Fred1new - 18 Apr 2006 11:52 - 16016 of 27111

No news doesn't worry me. But news often does.

Tonyrelaxes - 18 Apr 2006 11:59 - 16017 of 27111

Looking at the Notice of AGM there are two Special Resolutions. The second is to permit the Company to make market purchases of its own shares - up to 94,279,873 shares, which it says is "approximatly 10% of the issued shares.

I thought share buy backs were a means of enhancing shareholder value by the reverse of dilution (concentration?). Anyone know anything about this now with SEO? And what is the significance of the very specific number of shares that could be involved?

lindos - 18 Apr 2006 12:28 - 16018 of 27111


tonyrelaxes
Very interesting

lindos - 18 Apr 2006 12:28 - 16019 of 27111


tonyrelaxes
Very interesting

lindos - 18 Apr 2006 12:28 - 16020 of 27111


tonyrelaxes
Very interesting

hewittalan6 - 18 Apr 2006 12:34 - 16021 of 27111

Not very significant really, Tony.
The constitution of most companies allows for the purchase of its own shares at any time, but the mandate to do so, and the very strict rules over how many, how much and when has to be reviewed at every AGM and refreshed for the coming 12 months.
Standard AGM resolution, I believe.
Alan

Fred1new - 18 Apr 2006 12:51 - 16022 of 27111

I think it depends on whether they are kept as treasury stocks or not. If treasury then that should not really effect the sp and "resold" later or can be used to fund acquisitions or options etc.
I think possibly without requiring an AGM

The overall value of the company is to effected.

But check what I have written.

JJS - 18 Apr 2006 12:57 - 16023 of 27111



Hello again,

It looks like I did speak too soon, with the SP changing direction soon after I last posted :(

I wonder if the MMs are working an order, as we don't usually see this much volatility on such low volumes ?

JJS - 18 Apr 2006 13:00 - 16024 of 27111


Tony,

Might I suggest that the buyback could be used as a blocking move, to prevent a hostile takeover bid ?

If you add up the number of shares already tightly held, and add the 10% buyback, then see whats left, is it than less than 50% of the stock ?

Tonyrelaxes - 18 Apr 2006 13:18 - 16025 of 27111

Thanks all.
My query was really about any significance of the specific number of shares involved - neither a round number nor a specific percentage.
The reasons for buybacks can only be good.
Further query - is there a "closed period" during which the Company cannot buy back ahead of news that could affect the SP? If not it arrears the Directors could use their knowledge of upcoming events/announcements to buy back for the benefit of both the Company and Shareholders - a thoroughly good move!

oblomov - 18 Apr 2006 13:45 - 16026 of 27111



Hello again, JJS

I take it you're not going to answer my question then, and we dont really know whether Howard was in the States last week - he could have been at the South Pole for all we really know.

Tonyrelaxes - 18 Apr 2006 14:03 - 16027 of 27111

Oblo [ Hi :-) ]

See my post 16015 re Howard's travels.

oblomov - 18 Apr 2006 14:10 - 16028 of 27111



Thanks Tony - already did. Just being argumentative!

Still like to know how these things get started, though. You read things on these BB's that people post with authority and you wonder 'how can they possibly know that?' - Know what I mean? If it originated from PM1, 'nuff said, nothing surprises!

I think JJS, having made the post, you could have answered even if to say you were just copying an unsubstantiated post from elsewhere. Like I said, fact is we dont know where Howard was last week, so why pretend we do?

PapalPower - 18 Apr 2006 14:31 - 16029 of 27111

Tony, it would be good if this is a new addition to the special resolutions !! If it is it would mean they expect soon to have enough cash flow to start buying back their shares to, as you say, concentrate and therefore increase the value.

Perhaps the filter tow patent is in fact going to be very valuable :) ????

rpaco - 18 Apr 2006 14:44 - 16030 of 27111

I believe that buy backs are also used to provide shares for employee share schemes and for directors options/emoluments/get rich quick schemes. However if they cancel 10% it will enhance the price.

Tonyrelaxes - 18 Apr 2006 14:56 - 16031 of 27111

PapalP
I cannot find my copy of the Annual Report y/e 31 Oct 2004 to see it this is a new item or not.

rpaco
I think employee share scheme etc issues come from new, previously unissued shares. Pages 43 and 44 of latest Annnual report shows numbers of shares which can be issued in the future under various Employee and Management Incentive schemes.

niceonecyril - 18 Apr 2006 14:59 - 16032 of 27111

Would such buy back have an adverse effect on the SP,
ie;to keep at a lower price could be advantageous to the company?
cyril

Tonyrelaxes - 18 Apr 2006 15:33 - 16033 of 27111

Cyril.
Not so sure a buy back lowers the price. Thinking about it, in theory it should be neutral at that time.
In the books a buy back depletes cash but at the same time reduces the number of shares that participate in the remaining net assets.
A buy back reduces the number of shares in circulation so each remaining share has a greater proportion of the Company's Market Cap.
Presumably Directors will only carry out a buy back if they think the overall market worth of the Company is to rise more than market anticipation.
Directors have a better idea of what news is in the pipeline so could use that knowledge to the Company' shareholder's advantage by reducing the number of shares in circulation with a buy back prior to releasing that news or its resulting profits.
Hence my query about a possible Closed Period or such activities.
I have no idea of the tax implications for the Company of buy back transactions or how differences between Nominal Value and Price are dealt with - possibly via the Share Premium Account.
Register now or login to post to this thread.