Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Fred1new - 10 Apr 2012 15:15 - 16042 of 81564

You had better out your chips in the right bag.

Not the one marked pasties.


2517GEORGE - 10 Apr 2012 15:19 - 16043 of 81564

mnamreh, not quite sure how to take your reply, ha! ha!
2517

mnamreh - 10 Apr 2012 15:24 - 16044 of 81564

.

Fred1new - 10 Apr 2012 15:54 - 16045 of 81564

N,

"unbelievable in the extreme"

The "tory old boys club government" is "extreme", but due to its platitudinous presentations of its "policies", it is not notice by the card carrying adherents of the party, who are hoping for their welfare tax benefits.

==============

Macmillan is turning in his grave, looking for the silver.

---------------------------

2517.

It would be more efficient to collect your rubbish once a month.

This would be more efficient and cut down on costs and boost private enterprise profits.

Mind there would be cost to health, but what does that matter.

It might even help by cutting down on overpopulation by the dependent and could again be cost effective. (Cheaper way of euthanasia and less bureaucracy.)

----------------------

N,

http://order-order.com/

You do get around, but I suspect you are trying to get me into trouble.

9-)




mnamreh - 10 Apr 2012 16:03 - 16046 of 81564

.

dreamcatcher - 10 Apr 2012 17:31 - 16047 of 81564

David Garibaldi - Michael Jackson painting

http://youtu.be/M-Uy5T4x-p4

David Garibaldi jesus painting, fantastic

http://youtu.be/-jeLl-mNAxY

ahoj - 11 Apr 2012 08:17 - 16048 of 81564

Interesting report by ALCOA.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/11/business/alcoas-first-quarter-earnings-surpass-estimates.html?partner=yahoofinance

Fred1new - 11 Apr 2012 10:44 - 16049 of 81564

Thought for today.

Is Cameron in Indonesia as a carpet-bagger, or a gun-runner?

But it is good to know he is relaxed about his tax affairs.

I though he had fled the country again allowing George to H___.

--------

Fred1new - 11 Apr 2012 10:44 - 16050 of 81564

.

ahoj - 12 Apr 2012 07:58 - 16051 of 81564

Good news, isn't it:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/latest-mf-global-payback-plan-040819072.html

ahoj - 12 Apr 2012 08:07 - 16052 of 81564

Interesting development; you may like it or hate it.

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/argentina-satisfied-bps-falklands-rejection-183013583.html

skinny - 12 Apr 2012 08:17 - 16053 of 81564

Some dog!

Seven foot Great Dane

mnamreh - 12 Apr 2012 08:21 - 16054 of 81564

.

ahoj - 12 Apr 2012 09:14 - 16055 of 81564

I wonder who writes the news that we read in various website in the first place.

Most financial news have the same text, the same analogy as if they are written by a single organization and fed into other financial news agencies.

What worries me is the style of interpretation and sometimes mis-interpretation. Regardless of the news is, they interpret bad news sometimes as a good news, sometimes good news as bad. What worries me is that they interpret in the same way, most of the times using exactly the same text. (Check the text in BBC, Bloomburg, Yahoo, CNBC, and alike)

IS it irresponsible behavior by the media, or monopoly by one agency which has a specific agenda?

mnamreh - 12 Apr 2012 09:25 - 16056 of 81564

.

ahoj - 12 Apr 2012 09:31 - 16057 of 81564

I didn't mean that sort of strange news that you can find these. I assume you meant: http://www.davidicke.com/

2517GEORGE - 12 Apr 2012 10:01 - 16058 of 81564

There's been a proliferation of solar panels in and around where I live, a word of warning, Moneyweek magazine last week told of a couple who had solar panels fitted in December 2011, the company installing them paid for them and the installation, and therefore kept any monies from the sell back arrangement. The couple benefitted from free electricity through the day, estimated to be in the region of £150 over the year. Their mortgage provider okayed the deal.

The crunch---- when the couple wanted to remortgage to a more favourable rate with their building society, they were refused on the grounds that mortgages won't be offered on houses with a solar lease in place. It was the same story everywhere else they tried.

2517

greekman - 12 Apr 2012 10:09 - 16059 of 81564

Hi George,

Your post has highlighted something that should be borne in mind by all who go for new technology.

Greek.

2517GEORGE - 12 Apr 2012 10:18 - 16060 of 81564

greekman, I have to say I have been tempted myself, but only by paying for it and reaping the benefit of selling back to the grid myself, but you are absolutely right, this couple wanted to remortgage, if they wanted to sell any buyers would have to be cash buyers. I wonder how many 'free fitted' householders are aware of this.
2517

greekman - 12 Apr 2012 12:52 - 16061 of 81564

The thing is, if you buy the system itself and therefore own the panels, you would have to trust the government re any pay in tariffs.
Whilst appreciating that they were found to have broken the rules in the feed in tariff, when they wanted to cut the percentage, the government was only found to have done so due to lack of time and consultation given.
As I understand it, they are going to try to re jig said tariffs, over a longer time line.
It all depends on how much you trust our governments.
For myself, I trust them over feed in tariffs as much as I do on any government lead pension system or/and any promise of age related personal tax allowances for the over 65's, IE nil % trust.
Actually, I would sooner trust a hungry Rottweiler to play with my privates.
Register now or login to post to this thread.