Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


Neetybot - 25 Apr 2006 13:20 - 16139 of 27111

With other's, no doubt M&S included close behind Greekman!

oblomov - 25 Apr 2006 13:32 - 16140 of 27111


JJS,

the more you post the more you sound like PM1! Your last post brings to mind his famous '25 SP' statement. We can all do simple multiplication arithmatics - we did it with Greenseal, unfortunately we were multiplying by by hundreds or thousands (PM1 by millions!) and the actual figure we should have multiplied by was 2!

I'd love to see hundreds or thousands of licenses issued, but at present there are none. Lets try to stick to the facts. We've all been here before.

Your 'this market will be entered into by a substantial number of micro manufacturing plants' is speculation, yet you present it as fact.


JJS - 25 Apr 2006 13:38 - 16141 of 27111

Oblomov,

My statement ? 'this market will be entered into by a substantial number of micro manufacturing plants'

That statement IS FACT not speculation !

It is from todays announcement fer gawds sake !

Notice the wording "WILL BE", not "might be", or "could be", or even "hope to be".

That is what Stanelco are telling you, I am just the messenger.

KEAYDIAN - 25 Apr 2006 14:05 - 16142 of 27111

I'm in.

KD.

hewittalan6 - 25 Apr 2006 14:09 - 16143 of 27111

And a very warm welcome to you, KEAYDIAN

barney12345 - 25 Apr 2006 14:43 - 16144 of 27111

JJS

Calm down. I am afriad many of us who have been in SEO for years have heard and seen this before and just because SEO say "will be" does not mean money in the bank. Take this for example from the 1st ASDA RNS "ASDA anticipate that
several hundred machines in its supply base will be adapted to utilise the
technology due to the significant benefits it delivers." and 18 months later we have 2-3 machines

Whilst we all believe things will be better this time it is still in many ways jam tomorrow and hype on BB's.
I mean last month everyone was excited about petal pack, the frog pack etc etc.

It all sounds good but widows and orphans avoid.

Show me the money........................

oblomov - 25 Apr 2006 14:45 - 16145 of 27111



I know where you took the statement from, JJS, but it isn't fact until the deals have been signed and licenses issued, whatever SEO may have us believe.

Barney beat me to it, so I'll say no more.

KEAYDIAN - 25 Apr 2006 14:49 - 16146 of 27111

Many thanks hewittalan6

Tonyrelaxes - 25 Apr 2006 14:56 - 16147 of 27111

Here we go again? LOL

Ambiguity within the Business wire?

"...material can be produced at a discount to conventional plastic materials such as APET and Polypropylene."

".. material will soon become an environmentally and cost effective alternative to APET and Polypropylene (PP). "

"Can" and "will soon" not quite the same thing in my book of plain English

JJS - 25 Apr 2006 15:03 - 16148 of 27111


Barney/Oblomov

First Barney, the wording you have chosen is not in the right context, the right word in that context to focus on is "anticipate", and no such wording appears in todays statement.

And for both of you. You seem to forget what investing is about.

Lesson 1:
Buy before the news and before the big money piles in and the price rockets

Lesson 2:
Sell after the news arrives and when the big money is coming in or when growth starts slowing

If you really think it's a good idea to wait for the MCap to reflect the 200m I have suggested for 50 MML's then thats just bad investing.


johnny the fox - 25 Apr 2006 15:06 - 16149 of 27111

Agree. Where did the story re walmart & tyson originate. Can anyone substantiate, or not. We've all seen the hype before.

JJS - 25 Apr 2006 15:20 - 16150 of 27111


Johnny,

As far as I know PM1 got the info, and sent it round to his contacts.

hewittalan6 - 25 Apr 2006 15:25 - 16151 of 27111

So there is a question for you at the AGM next week, Oblo.
Were Tyson and Walmart in the UK this week talking to SEO?
If they were, then PM1's info is better than many of us give him credit for. If they were not, he is a ramping t*** who can be safely ignored!!
Alan

johnny the fox - 25 Apr 2006 15:27 - 16152 of 27111

JJS

I have the PM1 emails. But I always treat unsubstantiated 'rumours' with caution as should everyone, this share was ramped up on unfounded gossip last year.

EWRobson - 25 Apr 2006 15:52 - 16153 of 27111

foxy: whilst we should probably be cautious about the WM and Tyson visit until it is confirmed, the Starpol 3 Business Wire should be taken at face value. There is nothing sinister about the use of phrases such as 'can be produced at a discount to...' and 'envisioned that this material will soon... The key sentence is 'Biotec has successfully overcome the final technical hurdles to full commercialisation in the development of its STARPOL 3000 biodegradable, rigid material.' Technical hurdles overcome allowing commercial negotiations, manufacturing planning and approval cycle initiation. The potential numbers are becoming mind-boggling. Not surprisingly, a number of cynics around. The cautious approach is to wait until later in the product development process, but no doubt the big winners 'will be' the risk-takers. {see business wire on driver's column}.

Eric

oblomov - 25 Apr 2006 16:20 - 16154 of 27111


Thanks for the advice on investing, JJS, but as I'm showing a profit of some 130% on SEO in two years I dont think I really need any lessons! On those kind of profits I'm happy to sit this out for a while in the hope that some of the enourmous potential can be converted into cash.

You seem to imagine that anything either Stanelco or PM1 says can be taken as gospel. If you haven't already done so, may I suggest you read the RNS's over the past 18 months or so and then look at the reality of what followed.

As for PM1 - it is clear now you are not him as he would have become abusive by now, so apologies for suggesting you might be! Ask yourself why he has needed to retreat to the safety of his own website (after being banned everywhere else) before you trust his wild claims.

Nice gain today but still based on expectations - lets hope we can see some concrete deals soon, which will lead to income, which will lead to a sustainable SP and possibly further rise to add to my 130% profit!

Another good example of 'Stanelcospeak', Tony. I rest my case.

rpaco - 25 Apr 2006 16:21 - 16155 of 27111

I've been in for 2 years now and bought at every price from 4p to 19p.

Anyone know why the Asda Greenseal conversions have not been carried out? Could it be that SEO did not invest in a number of sealing machines themselves to act as bank stock so that each Asda machine could be replaced with a ready converted one? (Obviously one of each type would be needed and could possibly be sold after the conversions were finished) If they wait for each machine to be taken out of service they will never finish. They surely should have been doing at least 2 per week. This worries me in as far as if their organisational skills are really not up to it, I cant have much faith in full exploitation. Is the method of operation of the new machnes so different that complete operator re-training is necessary?

If all the company potential rests in a few brilliant engineers and chemists and a fast talking mouth at the top, it will never flourish unless it is taken over. It needs to have well managed motivated people actually doing the grafting, no matter how big the MD's or CEO's mouth is. That applies both to the service engineers doing the converstions and the sales and marketing people.

If Starpol is successful might there not be a reason for the oil industry to buy them out. Or to copy the process, this can easily be done in countries who are not particular about patents. (Look at the pharmecutical industry)

Another thought, this (Starpol) is starch based, where does the starch come from? I suspect that sugar has a large part in it. (no doubt I will be proved wrong) Sugar has risen hugely in price due the biofuel industry starting to kick off. Renova RVA have climbed from 80 to 260 in a year making Ethanol based fuel. Sugar cane plantations are failing because of the climate change so SEO will eventually be subject to raw material cost increases.

Any thoughts on the above ramblings? (My average buying price is 17.18p)

johnny the fox - 25 Apr 2006 16:23 - 16156 of 27111

EW

I didn't 'anticipate' or 'might be' investing in seo. I have a big invest in seo. All I am saying is don't get caught out by unsubstantiated hype & rumours from certain quarters that may or may not be true.

oblomov - 25 Apr 2006 16:30 - 16157 of 27111


Shown as a big sell (1,095,000) at 16:24, but the price has ticked up. Was that a buy, maybe?

Edited at 16:37 with:- The tick up has now gone back, so probably a sell!

oblomov - 25 Apr 2006 16:35 - 16158 of 27111


rpaco,

We do not have an up to date number of machine conversions, to my knowledge. The 2 conversions were prior to technical problems which I believe we have been told were overcome (though, in view of some of the above posts, I cant remember by whom - hopefully not PM1!).

No sugar involved in starpoL to my knowledge. The starch is (or can be) taken from corn, rice, potatoes etc. Rice and corn presumably easy to produce, sustainable and cheap.



Register now or login to post to this thread.