Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Tadpole Evolves (TAD)     

ainsoph - 23 May 2003 13:32

A new thread that may swim in hibernation for a few days or weeks as the process of evolution takes place ......

Imagine a slimmed down debt free company with one division stacked with orders and self financing with cash in the bank.

Then imagine a partner for the other division with pockets so deep that they could fund a rocket to the moon ..... and back

Dreaming of course but Tads can do that to you ..... what a gem or is that a bygone dream as well .....


ainsoph


We started the day at 4.75p mid - risk grade 583 - currently 6p - spamming posts 63 out of 140

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 08:40 - 162 of 729

have to say i don't agree but oh well

price down a tick

due to real selling/profit taking or just a ploy?

time will tell

Andy - 27 May 2003 08:40 - 163 of 729

Bullshare,

Yes well done, the Traders Room had actually become a personal battleground, and something had to be done before only the combatants were left!

It had got to the ridiculous stage where posts were being cut and pasted BETWEEN this BB and " an AM competitor"!

You definately need a "super squelch" button that you can apply between 2 posters as soon as a personal battle develops, this would save so much tedium for the other posters.

I would have thought that anyone looking in this BB for the first time would propbably have never returned after just reading the TAD thread, which was always at the top, and therefore, quite likely to be the first one they would select.


rjs,

Good post, I agree entirely.

I feel that now this is hopefully over, we can return to share talk, and yes, why is TAD up so much today please?

Andy.

Densil - 27 May 2003 08:53 - 164 of 729

Not up quite so much now as the profit takers move in to consolidate earlier trades. The question now is: Is there enough strength in the sentiment to trigger off another round of buying and make them all step in again?
The rumours of a large investment from a software partner have yet to take on any flesh but they still persist.

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 09:04 - 165 of 729

i told you to sell rico

;-)

rjs - 27 May 2003 09:23 - 166 of 729

>DD,

Nah, I think the game is afoot now.

Also - never would have got the volume away at the time.

I'm happy though.

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 09:24 - 167 of 729

;-)

ho hum ho hum

rjs - 27 May 2003 09:27 - 168 of 729

this reminds me of the good old days - when we'd only just had an 80% fall ;-)

Clarvis Spicer - 27 May 2003 09:40 - 169 of 729

I see that there has been a clean up of the board then.
Being an inexperienced poster, I was surprised when two weeks ago one of the moderators confirmed that posters on both sides had multiple log ins, have these been banned now as well.
Perhaps in the interests of fairness we could be told what other names won't be appearing.
I was most concerned at the time that I learnt this, as winning in the markets is hard enough at the best of times without deception from fellow posters.
Let's hope that Tadpole will emerge now that the in fighting is finished.
Clarvis

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 09:42 - 170 of 729

A perfect example of what can be achieved with the squelch button

Clarvis Spicer - 27 May'03 - 09:40 - 168 of 168 (Filtered)



dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 09:43 - 171 of 729

I note the gap between buys and sells is still the same as when the bid was at 6.75p

I guess if we see any further large buys we will find out if they are short or whether it is a suckers rally

snappy - 27 May 2003 09:51 - 172 of 729

How about naming the multiple id posters moneyam? Presumably some of those booted had multiple ids?

Well done for taking a sensible decision.

Re Tad. Suckers rally or the start of a more positive move? - only time will tell.

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 10:29 - 173 of 729

I agree snap and well put

that 300k may get things moving again

Moneylender - 27 May 2003 10:34 - 174 of 729

Hi snappy

thought I would let you know I am
still here. Not one of the Aliases.


M

Densil - 27 May 2003 11:00 - 175 of 729

This could be the start of the next wave now we've ticked up.

Moneylender - 27 May 2003 11:04 - 176 of 729

Lets hope so.

Some positive newsflow drom TAD at this time
would be very well recieved.

M

iago - 27 May 2003 11:28 - 177 of 729

A good chance it will climb much higher, 'why'? I decided not to add this morn. The best indicator known.

Densil - 27 May 2003 11:37 - 178 of 729

Thanks iago, it needs all the contra indicators it can get ;-)

Densil - 27 May 2003 11:40 - 179 of 729

They're managing the spread quite hard to keep things under control

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 11:43 - 180 of 729

It certainly smacks of being held at this level

just depends whether or not they can stiffle the enthusiasm as to whether it will work or not

Moneylender - 27 May 2003 11:47 - 181 of 729

Mike
Is this right, you have succumed to the "campaign"
If you had acted earlier this situation would nor have arisen.

M

Neo Anderson - 27 May'03 - 11:08 - 36099 of 36104


Aye DD.

My banning bothers me not...ainsoph has been stopped so I see it as a cheap price to pay.

I'll register again in a day or 2 and there will be no need to continue the campaign because it is WON.....but as in these things the victory doesn't taste as good as it might....

Regards.
Register now or login to post to this thread.