Will this increase or decrease the likelihood of terrorist actions in America, Europe and the rest of the world?

If you were a member of a family murdered in this conflict, would you be seeking revenge?

Should Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert, be tried for war crimes if or when this conflict comes to an end?

What will the price of oil be in 4 weeks time?

But do you not see how religion infuses our culture and colours us by providing the ethos for our social mores and moral judgments?
You have not stepped outside that mindset - at least not yet, even though you think you have.

And how does religion colour your mindset

LOL

If you want a bad read then try this

http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/

I'm not Jewish !!!!

And don't worry you can use words like damascene and ellipses to express your meaning.

In the land -Whatever other injustices are committed in this world you more than most will understand the espression that when Israel sneezes the world catches a cold.

You will never change peoples perceptions of what a Zionist is or what a Jew is.They are grouped together and if the likes of that pathertic moroon fahel ever came to power.you know who will be first in line.

Its a sad sad world when people can only accuse Israel of mistreating its fellow Arab neighbours-and totally missing the point of what Israeli brains have brought to the region in terms of scientific ,medical, technological developments for starters.

But hey what do I care ?

yuff, you're a breath of fresh air but expect the anti-semitic outrage to pour out of certain people here for daring to say what you have.

In the Land of the B
There you go again! You are misquoting me. I never said you were Jewish. I said "And how does religion colour your mindset". I never assumed that you were Jewish. As I have said before the problem with Israel has nothing to do with Jews.

I didn't use the term ellipses as Celine never referred to it as that. He just called it his three dots.

"anti-semitic outrage to pour out of certain people here"
It is NOT about anti-semitism. I beginning to think that logic is lost on you.

You said,
"And how does religion colour your mindset

LOL"


which implies that you think I must be Jewish. So not a misquote.

"the problem with Israel has nothing to do with Jews" Really? What problem?

I thought you had the intellect to move beyond three dots and use the correct word. Or perhaps you just think Celine should be copied..........

I'm not sure that logic is relevant here. Take this sentence: "Its a sad sad world when people can only accuse Israel of mistreating its fellow Arab neighbours-and totally missing the point of what Israeli brains have brought to the region in terms of scientific ,medical, technological developments for starters." The logical conclusion is that any nation can behave in any way it wants provided it brings scientific, medical, and technological developments to the region. Now that is clearly wrong (to my mindset at least) and that would apply to any country, the UK as well if it behaved like that.

If so, maybe you should remember that he wrote many anti-Semitic articles and pro-Nazi ones during the occupation of France. If you are ignorant of that - which I doubt - do a little research of your own.
And don't bother looking for a Jew who thinks Celine was a good writer. There's always one.

No that is not a logical conclusion at all, kayak.
The point he made was that some people can only accentuate what they believe to be negative without being broad minded enough to see positives as well.

That is very illogical. It means one can't have a discussion about X without discussing Y as well. I can't say that the neighbour's grass is uncut without saying that his roses look nice. If I try to say that the neighbour's grass is uncut, I get a stream of abuse.

The point is that it doesn't matter if Jews or non-Jews think Celine is a good writer. He is still a good writer. He wasn't anti-Jewish, he was anti almost everyone. If Hitler, Stalin, or some other psychopath was a good writer then I would probably read them as well.

Your analogy is not appropriate.
When you have people saying a country is a rogue state which shouldn't exist and quote endless internet propaganda and display their own prejudice then it's entirely valid for others to refute that and provide positives to consider.
No-one is saying Israel is perfect, that is ridiculous, but to speak of good things as well as perceived negatives is fair and reasonable.
Now if the discussion is about the Gaza war, which was the original vehicle for fred's diatribes, then it is fair and reasonable to discuss Israeli failings as well as understanding their justification for it. However, as you know this has moved on to haymaker and fred and fahel saying a lot of other things which will not go unchallenged.

In the Land

You said,
"And how does religion colour your mindset
LOL"

"which implies that you think I must be Jewish. So not a misquote."

Of course it doesn't imply that I think you must be Jewish. I was just asking back the same question that you asked of me. You could be Muslim (unlikely), Hindu, Buddist, Christian. how would I know. Plenty of non Jews support Israel.

haymaker says
He (Celine) wasn't anti-Jewish, he was anti- almost everyone.
Not so, he was a great admirer of the Nazis and Hitler and wrote several years after the war and his imprisonment, that the Nazis'had been too soft on the "Yids" '
So, is he your favourite author?

Who exactly has said, on this thread, that Israel is a rogue state which shouldn't exist and quoted endless internet propaganda, apart from fahel?

No one has said that you shouldn't challenge other people's beliefs. That is the whole point of civilised discussion. By all means challenge Haystack and Fred.

In the Land
Do you always misquote people? I did not say that Israel should not exist. I said that Israel should not have existed. It does exist now, so we are all stuck with it. If I had the chance to change things then I would change the name of Israel to Palestine and remove all the borders between Israel and the Palestinians. It wouldn't be easy, parlt because of teh extremists on both sides.

In the Land of
Celine even called Hitler a Jew.

Do you like Dostoevsky? He was anti-Jewish as well.

How about Roald Dahl? "I am not anti-Semitic. I am anti-Israel." Dahl told a reporter in 1983.

What about T. S. Eliot, now he was anti-semitic.

Should we avoid all these and other authors?

April 9, 2010
Anti-Israel Protests Not Anti-Semitic
Happily, a Scottish court has made a very sensible ruling that anti-Israel protests are not anti-semitic and thus do not constitute "racially aggravated behaviour":