Fred1new
- 06 Jan 2009 19:21
Will this increase or decrease the likelihood of terrorist actions in America, Europe and the rest of the world?
If you were a member of a family murdered in this conflict, would you be seeking revenge?
Should Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert, be tried for war crimes if or when this conflict comes to an end?
What will the price of oil be in 4 weeks time?
In The Land of the B
- 26 Apr 2010 15:50
- 1630 of 6906
You said,
"And how does religion colour your mindset
LOL"
which implies that you think I must be Jewish. So not a misquote.
"the problem with Israel has nothing to do with Jews" Really? What problem?
I thought you had the intellect to move beyond three dots and use the correct word. Or perhaps you just think Celine should be copied..........
Kayak
- 26 Apr 2010 15:55
- 1631 of 6906
I'm not sure that logic is relevant here. Take this sentence: "Its a sad sad world when people can only accuse Israel of mistreating its fellow Arab neighbours-and totally missing the point of what Israeli brains have brought to the region in terms of scientific ,medical, technological developments for starters." The logical conclusion is that any nation can behave in any way it wants provided it brings scientific, medical, and technological developments to the region. Now that is clearly wrong (to my mindset at least) and that would apply to any country, the UK as well if it behaved like that.
In The Land of the B
- 26 Apr 2010 15:55
- 1632 of 6906
If so, maybe you should remember that he wrote many anti-Semitic articles and pro-Nazi ones during the occupation of France. If you are ignorant of that - which I doubt - do a little research of your own.
And don't bother looking for a Jew who thinks Celine was a good writer. There's always one.
In The Land of the B
- 26 Apr 2010 15:58
- 1633 of 6906
No that is not a logical conclusion at all, kayak.
The point he made was that some people can only accentuate what they believe to be negative without being broad minded enough to see positives as well.
Kayak
- 26 Apr 2010 16:02
- 1634 of 6906
That is very illogical. It means one can't have a discussion about X without discussing Y as well. I can't say that the neighbour's grass is uncut without saying that his roses look nice. If I try to say that the neighbour's grass is uncut, I get a stream of abuse.
Haystack
- 26 Apr 2010 16:04
- 1635 of 6906
The point is that it doesn't matter if Jews or non-Jews think Celine is a good writer. He is still a good writer. He wasn't anti-Jewish, he was anti almost everyone. If Hitler, Stalin, or some other psychopath was a good writer then I would probably read them as well.
In The Land of the B
- 26 Apr 2010 16:13
- 1636 of 6906
Your analogy is not appropriate.
When you have people saying a country is a rogue state which shouldn't exist and quote endless internet propaganda and display their own prejudice then it's entirely valid for others to refute that and provide positives to consider.
No-one is saying Israel is perfect, that is ridiculous, but to speak of good things as well as perceived negatives is fair and reasonable.
Now if the discussion is about the Gaza war, which was the original vehicle for fred's diatribes, then it is fair and reasonable to discuss Israeli failings as well as understanding their justification for it. However, as you know this has moved on to haymaker and fred and fahel saying a lot of other things which will not go unchallenged.
Haystack
- 26 Apr 2010 16:20
- 1637 of 6906
In the Land
You said,
"And how does religion colour your mindset
LOL"
"which implies that you think I must be Jewish. So not a misquote."
Of course it doesn't imply that I think you must be Jewish. I was just asking back the same question that you asked of me. You could be Muslim (unlikely), Hindu, Buddist, Christian. how would I know. Plenty of non Jews support Israel.
In The Land of the B
- 26 Apr 2010 16:20
- 1638 of 6906
haymaker says
He (Celine) wasn't anti-Jewish, he was anti- almost everyone.
Not so, he was a great admirer of the Nazis and Hitler and wrote several years after the war and his imprisonment, that the Nazis'had been too soft on the "Yids" '
So, is he your favourite author?
Kayak
- 26 Apr 2010 16:20
- 1639 of 6906
Who exactly has said, on this thread, that Israel is a rogue state which shouldn't exist and quoted endless internet propaganda, apart from fahel?
No one has said that you shouldn't challenge other people's beliefs. That is the whole point of civilised discussion. By all means challenge Haystack and Fred.
Haystack
- 26 Apr 2010 16:25
- 1640 of 6906
In the Land
Do you always misquote people? I did not say that Israel should not exist. I said that Israel should not have existed. It does exist now, so we are all stuck with it. If I had the chance to change things then I would change the name of Israel to Palestine and remove all the borders between Israel and the Palestinians. It wouldn't be easy, parlt because of teh extremists on both sides.
Haystack
- 26 Apr 2010 16:27
- 1641 of 6906
In the Land of
Celine even called Hitler a Jew.
Haystack
- 26 Apr 2010 16:35
- 1642 of 6906
Do you like Dostoevsky? He was anti-Jewish as well.
How about Roald Dahl? "I am not anti-Semitic. I am anti-Israel." Dahl told a reporter in 1983.
What about T. S. Eliot, now he was anti-semitic.
Should we avoid all these and other authors?
Haystack
- 26 Apr 2010 16:36
- 1643 of 6906
April 9, 2010
Anti-Israel Protests Not Anti-Semitic
Happily, a Scottish court has made a very sensible ruling that anti-Israel protests are not anti-semitic and thus do not constitute "racially aggravated behaviour":
Camelot
- 26 Apr 2010 16:42
- 1644 of 6906
you are losing, haystack
why not just give it a rest
In The Land of the B
- 26 Apr 2010 16:44
- 1645 of 6906
I never said anti-Isreal = anti-Semitic
It obviously doesn't.
Damn good cover for some though.............
Haystack
- 26 Apr 2010 16:46
- 1646 of 6906
In the Land
Every time anyone attacks Israel, you claim anti-semitism.
In The Land of the B
- 26 Apr 2010 16:50
- 1647 of 6906
Your last post is simply untrue, haymaker. And you know it. You're just trying to to be Jesuitical or Talmudic.
Read what you like haystacker. It's still a free country. Relatively.
I can't help thinking that if a book was full of rabid anti-Jew or anti-Muslim or anti-Christian or anti-gay hatred, I personally would feel find it so morally repugnant I wouldn't want to keep on reading such material. Partly because I loathe intolerance and partly because SUCH BOOKS GENERATE AND ENCOURAGE HATRED IN THE ZEITGEIST OF A TIME AND A CULTURE. Just look at errr....... Celine........
Have you heard of, "by their friends ye shall know them"?
Maybe by their choice of reading matter shall ye know them........
Haystack
- 26 Apr 2010 16:54
- 1648 of 6906
I am not suggestting read anti-Jewish or anti any group literature. It is just that many of these authors are also anti semetic. Are you going to have a proscribed list of authors and books that cannot be read as does the Catholic Chruch.