Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

new millennium resources (NML)     

LEEWINK - 28 Mar 2004 15:45

NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.

They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.

does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??

Anomalous1 - 01 Nov 2005 00:01 - 1638 of 1909

>Mc

Very nice of you to buy me a share, but you need to be more careful with your money. After all, if you make choices like NML, you need the cash more than I do.

If only you had sold last year, you could have bought back in by now with 5 times as many shares. Still, if you have any AFD, FDI or EPD you should be able to make back all your losses from this one.

takahe - 01 Nov 2005 08:34 - 1639 of 1909

Well Anom..if we had the benefit of hindsight, it would be a different world. I could also buy 4 times as many EPD as last year..but fortunately, I did sell most of my holding in them and even made a slight profit on one batch.
I hope you are going to have the grace to apologise to anyone who sold yesterday and the days before, on your rantings about shareholders only having hours to sell before a supposed suspension.
I will hold all my shares in NML, thanks. The project is sound, lots of different companies are trying to get licenses in Angola and to list on the LSE...so in my opinion, NML have a good chance of succeeding, once they are sorted out. If they can pull off what they set out to do...restart the alluvials..the equipment is all there and secure a JV for kimberlite work which is what they have stated by RNS that they are trying to do..then we will all be very happy..except perhaps you.
I do hope it was not you that fed all that crap to the Shares Magazine....

GayBriefs - 01 Nov 2005 09:48 - 1640 of 1909

Sub 1p Game Over Goodnight!
Please turn the lights out on your way out....Thankyou and Goodbye!!

takahe - 01 Nov 2005 10:24 - 1641 of 1909

..are you the real GayBriefs or the other alias of you know who?
You'll be getting your monitors mixed up again!

Dynamite - 01 Nov 2005 11:12 - 1642 of 1909

New Millennium Resources Ltd
01 November 2005




New Millennium Resources Limited

Kimberlite acquisition / Issue of Shares


New Millennium Resources Limited (the 'Company') is pleased to announce that it
is in advanced stages of negotiations to acquire a kimberlite asset in Angola
through a joint venture or partial acquisition. Negotiations are expected to be
completed within the month of November 2005. The market will be further updated
once negotiations are completed.

New Millennium Managing Director Shane Healy commented:
The Company has lacked a hard rock kimberlite asset in Angola. Whilst we do have
indications of kimberlite on our concession in Greenland, in JV with Hudson
Resources, our objective has always been to have a kimberlite prospect in Angola
to compliment our alluvial operations. We now are close to achieving this
objective.

The Company also announces that it has placed 48,608,331 shares to raise
GB662,000 (41 million shares @ 1.1p and 7,608,331 million @ 2.77p) to provide
working capital for its exploration programme in Angola. It is expected that
these shares will be admitted to AIM on 4 November 2005.

The Company further announces that it has issued 13,874,865 shares for services
rendered to the Company in the form of consultancy, commissions and brokerage.

Contact:

New Millennium Resources Limited

Shane M. Healy (Finance Director)
Tel: +61 414 809 010

shealy@new-millennium.com.au

Daniel Stewart & Company Plc

Marc Young
Tel: +44 (0)207 374 6789

St. Swithins PR

Gary Middleton
Tel: +44 (0)795 160 3289

Well someone has confidence and this could be good.
Di

takahe - 01 Nov 2005 11:20 - 1643 of 1909

Hi Di..you beat me to it..I was just going to post it on, too.
Good news..I've just added some more at this crazy price..

TStringy - 01 Nov 2005 11:44 - 1644 of 1909

A tad premature GB???

GayBriefs - 01 Nov 2005 14:21 - 1645 of 1909

Looks like it.

VV.!

Andy - 02 Nov 2005 00:24 - 1646 of 1909

So a further 62 million shares have been added to the 173 million? already in issue, quite a dilution IMO.

Of course the cash is added too, so at the moment the company is better off, and provided it puts it to some good use, the dilution can be nuetral.

BUT, if it wastes it, then that really would be game over IMO.

With the current bid at 0.8p, those placees at 2.77p must be pretty miffed!
The 1.1p's won't be that happy either!

Does anyone know which brokers these shares were placed through?

stockdog - 02 Nov 2005 12:00 - 1647 of 1909

It may be interesting to speculate which new placees made it a condition of their money that certain connected parties/old placees had to put up the higher price. No one did it for fun or out of generosity, I am sure of that.

sd

Andy - 02 Nov 2005 12:09 - 1648 of 1909

Stockdog,

Interesting comment!

Out of interest, how do you know that "new placees made it a condition of their money that certain connected parties/old placees had to put up the higher price"?

So are you saying that the new placees only bought 48 million shares by making the older placees agree to buy them at a much higher price?

Sorry but they are businessmen, not charitable institutions, you're way off the mark there IMHO.

takahe - 02 Nov 2005 12:25 - 1649 of 1909

Does anyone know which of the three kimberlites on the C9 concession it was that NML were 'parked' on?

Dynamite - 02 Nov 2005 14:02 - 1650 of 1909

Thanks for the mail Takahe...very interesting and yes SD is right and my thoughts too. No one is going to buy huge amounts of a share at a much higher price unless they are convinced there is a good profit to be made. Obviously we don't get to see the info. they saw but it looks interesting.
Di

Andy - 02 Nov 2005 14:05 - 1651 of 1909

Di,

Are you seriously suggesting that people agreed to pay 2.77p yesterday for a share that was 0.8p BID?

Dynamite - 02 Nov 2005 14:14 - 1652 of 1909

not yesterday Andy but it must have been recently and NML have been down below this for a long time.

Andy - 02 Nov 2005 14:22 - 1653 of 1909

Di,

Well, looking at the chart, the price suggests September to me, I wonder how long they can hold back an announcement for?

Generally, placings are at a discount to market price, as an incentive, so IMHO that would have been done when the price was at 3p or more.

I'm surprised nobody knows which brokers handled this.

takahe - 02 Nov 2005 15:51 - 1654 of 1909

Di..it MIGHT have been the Malaysian Investors...they appear to be very supportive to NML. According to Healy, the big investors are happy...

stockdog - 02 Nov 2005 19:01 - 1655 of 1909

Andy
The deal is reported in the RNS -

"The Company also announces that it has placed 48,608,331 shares to raise
GB662,000 (41 million shares @ 1.1p and 7,608,331 million @ 2.77p) to provide
working capital for its exploration programme in Angola. It is expected that
these shares will be admitted to AIM on 4 November 2005."

The only reason that makes sense to me for hte two-tier price, is new placees wanting to buy at par, whilst the supplicants paid a premium to show food faith and to give then fewer shares per 1 paid. What else fits the facts - that they each paid a pro rata proportion ofthe two prices - why - just adjust it to a different single price?

Any other explanations from the experts?

sd

Andy - 02 Nov 2005 20:26 - 1656 of 1909

SD,

I know, but I can't fathom the difference in price.

Takahe's view that some people in Malaysia happily paid nearly three times more than the market price, and the other placees does not make sense.

They may be risk takers in the orient, but they're also shrewd, and certainly not charitable institutions!

takahe - 02 Nov 2005 21:11 - 1657 of 1909

It is not my VIEW...nothing as definite. I said MIGHT. As big holders already ,they are the only group I can think of that would stump up more money.
I don't see that it matters where the money came from, anyway. He's got it.
I hope he uses it wisely.
Register now or login to post to this thread.