bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
JJS
- 10 May 2006 16:42
- 16433 of 27111
Greekman,
Thanks, hopefully more of the same tomorrow :)
greekman
- 10 May 2006 16:49
- 16434 of 27111
Don't usually look at posting none serious stuff, so if you only want no nonesense reading don't go any further. This about Walmart. Will only put the link to save wasting some readers time.
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s8i10745
hewittalan6
- 10 May 2006 17:12
- 16435 of 27111
Are you absolutely certain that link is satire????
JJS
- 10 May 2006 17:16
- 16436 of 27111
"We will be placing the first contracted machine in the next eight weeks."
That explains the 2 months extension to the ASDA exclusivity (posted by someone else after the AGM)
Also if that is the case, can we expect those 30 and 40 machine orders now ?
greekman
- 10 May 2006 17:18
- 16437 of 27111
When I first read it it was a skim through so I started to take it seriously, very quickly reading it as it was intended. Now if it did materialise, Walmart would rule the world.
oblomov
- 10 May 2006 17:41
- 16438 of 27111
Gary,
'ASDA will most likely want at least and equivelant extension to the exclusivity period'
SEO have agreed to extend the exclusivity period for two months from the time of the first commercial conversion - this came from the AGM. So another 4 months of exclusivity, if the 8 week to first commercial conversion is realistic.
Assuming (hoping) there will then be a queue of potential customers wanting trials, aren't they going to need rather more than the three machines they have at present?
JJS,
'Looking undervalued even to the sceptics now LOL !' I'm sceptical of everything SEO say nowadays but I wouldn't still be in if I didn't think the SP was undervalued.
BTW, sorry I said you had predicted a 25 SP - It was actually PM1, but you're becoming so indistinguishable I thought I was talking to him!
JJS
- 10 May 2006 19:29
- 16439 of 27111
Explosive,
Before you blow early on the Starpack awards, it's going to be a tad delayed, LOL !
I just had a reply from Terry, he's out of the office, but got back to me from his blackberry with the following :-
"This year we put no products in for Starpack awards as the rules state that the products must be on the market during the previous 18 months, so we decided that next year they would be better placed and better known to the judges. The other reason is that as I am chairman of the judging committee it would be better for impartiality to wait until I retired from being senior judge as I have been for the past 5 years. This year was my last (I think)"
I hope this post is not to 'ramping' for Oblomov
zscrooge
- 10 May 2006 19:38
- 16440 of 27111
JJS - 10 May 2006 09:10 - 16376 of 16438
Oblomov,
You must have a screw loose if you say broker reccomendatios are 'hype', where do you think institutions get their info ???????????
Hilarious. What do you think the function of a broker (particularly house broker) is? There are dozens of shares whose sp has fallen (or risen for that matter) contrary to the statements made by brokers. And some are more trustworthy than others, particularly on small caps - you only need to look at those who have been taken to court for insider dealing and manipulation.
And as for institutions? Their judgement is often that of fund managers who are useless.
Do us a favour PM1 and at least try to write in a different style than that ramping cut n paste king.
JJS
- 10 May 2006 19:54
- 16441 of 27111
LOL what a load of self-opinionated BS !!
Do us a favour and bog off back to bprg or wherever you crawled from !!
oblomov
- 10 May 2006 20:01
- 16442 of 27111
Thats more like the Old PM1 I knew!
zscrooge
- 10 May 2006 20:06
- 16443 of 27111
Cue reams of cut n paste articles plus the words might, cusp, possibly, holding talks, continuing trials.
stockdog
- 10 May 2006 20:36
- 16445 of 27111
zscrooge - pleased you spelt 'cut n paste' correctly, not sure about 'cusp' though! or is that the lastest euphemism?
explosive
- 11 May 2006 00:55
- 16447 of 27111
End of day I think everyone sitting on these shares knew they would be a long play. Whats another year, if all this does end up materialising think of the profit!!
oblomov
- 11 May 2006 08:38
- 16448 of 27111
I was expecting a long play, but this is like the Lord of the bloody Rings (or The Ice Man Cometh, for those older amongst you)! I expect to die one day (I'm only in my fifties) - I'm just hoping they can convert a few machines before that happens! lol
BKK2
- 11 May 2006 08:40
- 16449 of 27111
Just how I feel
Peter
greekman
- 11 May 2006 08:54
- 16450 of 27111
Pack Expo International is one of the biggest, if not the biggest exhibition in the World with several hundred exhibitors. I can't find any reference under exhibitors listed to Stanelco or any linked company. Looking at the site I initially found that unbelievable. Why wouldnt Stanelco be at one of the largest packaging showcases of the year?
I then considered a different scenario. Perhaps SEO know that it would be a waste of time, money and effort. What if there is such a queue of potential customers wanting trials say over the next 12 months, they know that there is no point in looking for extra customers. There is no point in attracting potential customers if you then have to turn them away in the short to medium term. Stanelco's biggest showcase ever will be if/when Walmart get on board. I wonder how many companies are now following Stanelco's progress, with Greenseal and Starpol.
We have already received plenty of hints (ok rumors perhaps) of other such companys interest, McDonalds for one example. When the exclusive tie-in period Seo/Asda is completed, there will be in my opin'ion a large queue forming at Seo's checkout for their products. Obviously all imho, and I welcome any other thoughts from fellow posters.
http://pei2006.packexpo.com/packaging_suppliers/find/byname/M.html
oblomov
- 11 May 2006 09:16
- 16451 of 27111
Possibly comes down to manpower, greekman. with SEO having to man so many fronts at present. When reading about SEO in talks and meetings with the like of WM, McD, etc I think we tend to forget what a tiny setup they are. Does anyone know the total number of employees?
Hopefully they are using their manpower to concentrate on the important areas rather then spread themselves to thinly. They cant be everywhere.
greekman
- 11 May 2006 09:23
- 16452 of 27111
Oblomov,
Yes, that's what I was saying. They are as you say a small company. They are I hope being carefull that they don't overstretch themselves. If they get as big as their potential appears to be who knows.