bradleym
- 12 Jan 2005 19:14
After a disappointing start to its float, things are starting to pick up. Since the release of results in December, the shares have steadily increased from 147p to 161p.
The group has a strong and fast growing market share and should perform well.
goldfinger
- 02 Nov 2006 12:13
- 165 of 297
Nice and steady as she goes.
goldfinger
- 13 Nov 2006 10:49
- 166 of 297
Up she goes again.
goldfinger
- 16 Nov 2006 12:09
- 167 of 297
Onwards and upwards.
goldfinger
- 12 Dec 2006 09:22
- 168 of 297
Sp recovering after the last cautious RNS.
goldfinger
- 28 Dec 2006 13:26
- 169 of 297
Going very well now.
goldfinger
- 02 Jan 2007 10:15
- 170 of 297
Continues to break upwards, now a 50% return on this and its a retailer.
goldfinger
- 03 Jan 2007 11:15
- 171 of 297
Still very cheap, trades on a forward P/E of just 12.1 and a PEG of 1 to end of sept 2007.
goldfinger
- 08 Jan 2007 10:22
- 172 of 297
Profit warning, thats me out for a 27% gain.
Cant see this one recovering this year after todays statement.
Falcothou
- 08 Jan 2007 12:34
- 173 of 297
Must be good news for Canon though if they can't churn them out fast enough anyone knows who owns them and where they are listed?
hangon
- 28 Feb 2007 16:19
- 174 of 297
Another PW...oh dear, - yet I can't say I'm surprised - a bit of competition from just about everywhere sure hits their bottom line.
Indeed I'm surprised anyone thinks this is a good business to invest in.
-When was the last time you paid full-price for any photo-gear?
Yet JSP are charging silly proices for SD Memory - about 38/1G I think....and I got some Kingston (Lifetime g'tee) for 12 locally.
hlyeo98
- 28 Feb 2007 18:10
- 175 of 297
Jessops prices are too expensive...their cameras can cost 3 times more than other internet sites...no wonder profit warnings hit them again and again...SELL down to 50p.
Falcothou
- 28 Feb 2007 18:14
- 176 of 297
I don't find it is so much their cameras, though I do live in Guernsey where the VAT is taken off, but their ancillaries that are extortionate such as memory cards filters tripods flashguns. 7 day shop is much better value for them
hlyeo98
- 28 Feb 2007 19:36
- 177 of 297
It is no wonder that when Jessops float in October, 2004 at 150p per share, its value has hardly stayed above that value.
hlyeo98
- 28 Feb 2007 19:37
- 178 of 297
hlyeo98
- 28 Feb 2007 19:37
- 179 of 297
GordonG
- 01 Mar 2007 08:55
- 181 of 297
jessops have been here b4 only worry is the bank overdraft ??????????
hangon
- 01 Mar 2007 10:35
- 182 of 297
hlyeo98 - it seem yr 50p suggestion has come early! (nearly there).
Given that most of recent posters have been saying the JSP bits are too expensive JSP has two options IMHO:-
1) Drop all but flagship shops (saves rent and wages) and
2) provide a customer-based web-offering which can be more dynamic on price etc...and could allow them to branch into PC's perhaps as the new wave of free-software hits traaditional PC suppliers who are tied to Microsoft.
[I think Google and Linux together will soon make expensive software a thing of the past - we shall have only a browser on a PC saving HDD storage and Memory - so soon a pc on the move can be solid-state - you save yr files at Google. If Vista is mis-handled it could be the boost Google needs if they can write a basic Operating system - I don't think it needs to be as complicated as full-Linux, although that platform is "free", it still uses too much memory and HDD space....By cutting out the HDD and reducing memory (and boosting the graphoics card) most users will find only benefits. Encryption would be offered to prevent loss of sensitive data... The consequences for the PC industry will be dire so sell: Microsoft, Dell, HP (other than printer-sales etc.)...]
Driver: - I agree the shops/staff are OK - but what does the future hold ...can JSP ever charge profitable-prices, when the likes of Dixons has thrown in the towel?
I rest my case; but I didn't think the slide would be this quick...today there are many small Buys - I suppose these are punters averaging down - a tad too soon, I fear. Nevertheless, good luck.
bonfield
- 01 Mar 2007 11:00
- 183 of 297
this is such a disappointing share. One would expect with a competitior like Dixons throwing in the towel, they'd be getting more business not less!.
I got shaken out lof these last year in May at about 109 havign ridden them up from the 70s but banked a respectable profit. Was cussing when it went to 150 ish. Tempted back in at these levels, could be tempting for the private equity boys. I reckon a bid around 75p could be on based on cashflow, enterprise value etc. BWTFDIK?
In at 53.5 what the hell.
driver
- 01 Mar 2007 11:04
- 184 of 297
Going Down