bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
JJS
- 12 May 2006 19:39
- 16508 of 27111
The same as yours !
wahhhhhay !
JJS
- 12 May 2006 19:44
- 16509 of 27111
I notice shamona and Oblomov don't mention AEX up from 8p to nearly 50p, or that many people made a lot of money on LGB, and got out before the suspension, those still in might still make more than they put in. Shame about EVS, but as *** said when he Emailed them round, it was not his research so do your own, the research in fact was done by PapalPower on AD**N
So in between shamona and Oblomov we have a 'target *** with as much negative unsubstantiated schpeel as possible', the same campaign they have been running against *** for at least a year(he tells me), what are THEIR motives ???
I do not want to read their drivel.
oblomov
- 12 May 2006 19:47
- 16510 of 27111
What a strange idea this squelching is - like reading a newspaper but only reading the parts you want to hear! Maybe thats the same criteria you apply to your SEO research.
I dont believe for one moment either of you have sqelched anyone- - if you are at all normal you wouldn't want to miss what ANYONE had to say! Good weekend to all - I'm off now.
Oilywag
- 12 May 2006 20:22
- 16511 of 27111
SHAMONA
SINCERE APOLOGIES. I was getting you mixed up in my own mind with Blinger.
The oily one
oblomov
- 12 May 2006 20:38
- 16512 of 27111
Blinger - he's a different kettle of fish! (Seq, Stainco.etc.)
Have you really squelched me, though, Gary? Most offended if you have.
halfamil
- 12 May 2006 20:53
- 16513 of 27111
When you've all finished decicing who are the "good guys" and who are "bad", I'd like to thank E W Robson for his incisive posts.
zscrooge
- 12 May 2006 21:48
- 16514 of 27111
Sorry, but EWRobson is the thinking man's ramper.
Shamona,bos, hewittalan6 LOLS. Spot on.
Blinger could be abrasive but when Robson and
others were ramping when the sp was in the 20s
and predicting further rises without problems,
Blinger and II (for their own reasons or otherwise)
called it right from circa 28 to 14.
EWRobson
- 12 May 2006 22:06
- 16515 of 27111
Not a problem, zscrooge. That was a bad call, I admit. Got around 20p average, eventually, but that was a costly exercise. Never have I made so much on a run up or lost so much on the run down. But its interesting that the bulls, like me, rarely get out at the right time but , equally, the bears, like II still call it down after the tide has turned. Back in when it recovered from 12p to 15p on basis that tide had turned only for it to ebb back to 12.5p. The problem has been that you haven't been able to take either company announcements or analysts views at face value. But I have a fixation with SEO; I love their technological acumen; I sympathise with their commercial naivete; I want to be in when they roar into the FTSE 250. I think its called an addiction.
Eric
JJS
- 12 May 2006 23:12
- 16516 of 27111
?
bosley
- 12 May 2006 23:55
- 16517 of 27111
so now you're claiming to have insider knowledge?
ssanebs
- 13 May 2006 00:03
- 16518 of 27111
talks with WM did complete this week so it is not hard to guess plus the agm stated news very shortly.
tweenie
- 13 May 2006 03:42
- 16519 of 27111
roll on monday, shame I don't get paid till next week........
hopefully NOT more jam tommorrow..............
hewittalan6
- 13 May 2006 06:40
- 16520 of 27111
Personally, I don't think anyone can crow about calling it right with any consistency at all. II and Bling were calling it as a dead cert short in December at 12p to be shorted to 10p and everyone else was calling it long from 20p down to its current 13p.
Its an enigmatic share with the potential of being a world beater or a disaster in the making. In a former career, I would have urged that it made up <5% of your portfolio, which in turn made up <10% of your assets. It is simply too small to resist being tossed around on the waves of sentiment. The sideways momentum of it over recent months, despite the apparent lack of headway and the backtracking on earlier promises is testament to either the huge untapped potential or the efficacy of the rose tinted specs that PI's tend to wear. I hope its the former, I know Bos thinks its the latter.
For my sins, I think the sp is fair value. I see it as neither a buy, nor a sell until we see real news. And with such a small company, an RNS that was either solidly good or very bad would see the wave of sentiment be a tsunami to be ridden, or to drown the lot of us.
Summed up best by the old adage "not for widows and orphans".
Alan
zscrooge
- 13 May 2006 11:02
- 16521 of 27111
Fair enough Eric and hewittalan6.
Lots of potential - yer pays yer money...
bosley
- 13 May 2006 12:31
- 16522 of 27111
nice edit , paul.
alan, good post and fair comment.
oblomov
- 13 May 2006 12:38
- 16523 of 27111
JJS,
What happened to the news 7 a.m. Monday? You've edited it out of your post, does that mean the news has been postponed?
bosley
- 13 May 2006 13:08
- 16524 of 27111
oblomov, i prefered the last bit where he said that he was the only one who really knows what's going on and that he always will!!!
JJS
- 13 May 2006 15:03
- 16525 of 27111
Bosley,
Thanks, glad you didn't go jumping the gun by suggesting I might be wrong :)
One cannot leave information like that lying around too long, those that missed it will just have to work it out from the posts that follow.
bosley
- 13 May 2006 15:24
- 16526 of 27111
absolutely, paul. in fact, i hope that you are right. i'm certain the fsa would be interested as to how you obtain such priveledged information. i'm also sure the people at moneyam would not appreciate their site being associated with someone insider dealing.
BKK2
- 13 May 2006 15:41
- 16527 of 27111
where do you get INSIDER DEALING from, JJS has made a statement after trading hours when its been impossible to do any trading, IF INSIDER DEALING was his game I'm sure he would not be broadcasting on the bb's
Just hope the Guy's right and hope its GOOD NEWS
Peter