bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
cynic
- 16 May 2006 18:05
- 16599 of 27111
I was merely asking an innocent question .... or I thought I was! ...... I was merely curious, and was aware that, thank goodness, I didn't hold any
blackdown
- 16 May 2006 18:09
- 16600 of 27111
Cynic, you asked a perfectly reasonable question. Like you, I don't hold any of these and find it hard to see why any rational person would think that the sp is headed for the stratoshpere.
bosley
- 16 May 2006 18:12
- 16601 of 27111
cynic,
"830 pages of comment"
well, i suppose "comment" is one way of describing it :)
pinnacle, how on earth can you say stanelco have a problem promoting themselves? the problem they have is actually substantiating all that "promoting" !!
cynic
- 16 May 2006 18:24
- 16602 of 27111
bloody hell ..... didn't think I was stirring up a wasp's nest generating a further 24 pages of comment .... lol!!
WOODIE
- 16 May 2006 19:15
- 16604 of 27111
what makes people think the current s/price is cheap? no rude answers please.
explosive
- 16 May 2006 19:38
- 16605 of 27111
For me I couldn't really care what the charts say, its more about the vision that one day soon packaging will go green and Stanelco will be behind it. How this will ultimatly convert to profit is another matter and too many steps at the moment into the future.
I think that the current sp is cheap with comparison to this vision and the likelyness of SEO setting a new standard in the packaging world. It goes without saying that were yet to see any profit but I believe this is only a matter or time. SEO has 830 pages of comment on this thread alone and very strong support with many who share the view this company will be a sucess and not crash and burn in the process of finding and achieving their place within the packaging market.
rmhyams
- 16 May 2006 19:45
- 16606 of 27111
For Oilywag
Did you attend the AGM as you said you would?
If so, did you ask the questions that I raised on this BB?
Regards
RH
Biscuit
- 16 May 2006 19:58
- 16607 of 27111
Ooops somebody just wasted their time setting up 4 new names for themselves, how easy it is to squelch them
cynic
- 16 May 2006 20:03
- 16608 of 27111
I think I had better step out of this, avoiding one of my usual smart-arse comments, and just watch the ripples I have created .....
oblomov
- 16 May 2006 20:03
- 16609 of 27111
Yes Biscuit, easily spotted, aren't they? Seq?
explosive
- 16 May 2006 20:10
- 16610 of 27111
Last 3 posts, now I'm lost!!
garyble
- 16 May 2006 20:25
- 16611 of 27111
Oh wow,
Like vultures I see circling....wonder what their interest is in this little beauty?
WOODIE
- 16 May 2006 21:41
- 16612 of 27111
explosive thanks for your reply
ssanebs
- 16 May 2006 23:13
- 16613 of 27111
this company is talking to wal-mart,macdonalds and tyson foods, that is enough to take a punt. and why it is the most talked about share on this bb. The potential is huge lets hope they can deliver.
greekman
- 17 May 2006 07:57
- 16614 of 27111
OT of 3,527,663 just come in. If this was a sell, that could be the reason re the yesterdays drop. Was that an order being filled.
oblomov
- 17 May 2006 08:47
- 16615 of 27111
Excluding that OT we had
4,719,724 buys to 1,928,743 sells yesterday and a drop in the SP.
Presumably that makes it likely the OT was a sell. Does anyone more qualified than me have any opinion on this?
aldwickk
- 17 May 2006 09:09
- 16616 of 27111
The potential for Areobox was huge, look what happen to them.
aldwickk
- 17 May 2006 09:12
- 16617 of 27111
FEDEX was there Wal mart.
explosive
- 17 May 2006 09:14
- 16618 of 27111
I don't think Aerobox's potential is in the same league as Stanelco's.