Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


oblomov - 17 May 2006 17:05 - 16630 of 27111

I dont agree Soul Traders and driver.

SEO is not going to be affected by the FTSE if the deals and income streams expected come in because it will then be undervalued. The SP will rise to reflect that, whatever the FTSE may be doing.

Shares listed in the FTSE rise and fall on world markets, not only on the results of the company. The SEO SP isn't affected in the same way by what's going on with the DOW JONES, DAX, etc.

I hope I've got this right - I sold all my holdings except SEO Monday morning, expecting the fall in European markets to continue much further!


greekman - 17 May 2006 17:07 - 16631 of 27111

Soul Trader

With the FTSE dropping 170 points, I am well satisfied with SEO being .25p up.
If things are going bear-shaped ( I like the saying ) it will be the defensive shares as usual, such as tobacco, power, utilities etc that hold steady. But it will be also be the speculative shares such as SEO that will grab attention if/when that expected RNS comes in. This is the time when punters will be looking for a share who's prospects are not geared so much to the market trend but are geared to that companies prospects. If a recession is on the cards, people will still have to eat, and supermarkets are able to sustain profits due to their power over their producers margins. They will be looking even more at ways to cut costs, ie Seo products. I topped up yesterday, which I readily admit was a risky gamble, and it might have been more prudent to as you say, to wait until the market established a clear sense of heading in a positive direction. Time will tell who is right.
Hope we both make money on SEO ( but I hope I make a bit more ).

Cheers greek

Mad Pad - 17 May 2006 17:16 - 16632 of 27111

Put 40% of my portfolios into cash in the last few days(mainly mid,small cap and AIM sold ).Reckon its going to get a lot worse before it gets better.Willl hang onto SEO and keep fingers crossed.

driver - 17 May 2006 17:17 - 16633 of 27111

oblomov
My opinion was based on having no news while the FTSE is dropping.

oblomov - 17 May 2006 17:33 - 16634 of 27111

I thought that, driver, but as greekman says, a .25p rise and a 170 FTSE fall. I think even before news SEO will ignore the FTSE falling.

Interesting to see which way it goes.

tweenie - 17 May 2006 18:14 - 16635 of 27111

Driver, yes have seen FTSE.
Forgive me if i'm ill informed, but the FTSE is mostly driven by BIG institutional buying/selling.
As everyone keeps pointing out SEO has'nt got any.
LOL
I'm still more than happy to hold......all the way down to 10p and up to 5

explosive - 17 May 2006 18:37 - 16636 of 27111

Did an Alan also today and topped up whilst the price is low!!

soul traders - 17 May 2006 18:41 - 16637 of 27111

Good posts by everyone, I think - we shall see what happens. I would point out though that half of today's FTSE fall occurred in the last hour of play - in which time SEO's SP gave up half of its gain for the day, on low volume. What I'm getting at is that there wasn't a lot of time left for shareholders to react to today's broad market sell-off. Tomorrow morning could be interesting!

I think also that a bear market is going to punish heavily anything that looks like being overvalued, so on that basis I would hope on behalf of current shareholders that SEO can produce some truly positive newsflow, and quickly, if a price rise is to be achieved.

bosley - 17 May 2006 18:56 - 16638 of 27111

soul traders, there has been a relentless flow of truly positive news since last may.

soul traders - 17 May 2006 18:59 - 16639 of 27111

Indeed - and on the chart a relentless flow too.

WOODIE - 17 May 2006 19:08 - 16640 of 27111

if there has been a flow of good/positive newsflow, why has the s/price reached its low or near its low for the last year? and not sustained its uptrend.

garyble - 17 May 2006 19:47 - 16641 of 27111

Woodie,

As some would say, it has all been "Jam Tomorrow" stuff, combined with unrealistic timescales. However, all that has been expected has come to pass apart from the actual deals and cashflow......which will come. If not, SEO would have to be rated as the unluckiest company ever, as there are so many potential deals with supposedly very interested parties.

garyble - 17 May 2006 19:51 - 16642 of 27111

Can anyone explain the 3,527,663 trade at 18:33 for 11.5p yesterday evening. The other side does not list it and looks like it didn't really occur as MAM did not totalise either.

Clarification anyone?

WOODIE - 17 May 2006 21:44 - 16643 of 27111

garyble thanks for reply

greekman - 18 May 2006 08:33 - 16644 of 27111

Ok we have read this before, but with a slightly different slant.

What Wal-Mart wants Wal-Mart gets by JoAnn Hines 18/05/2006.

It's a good article well worth a read. A Brief Extract follows. ( copywrite ) For full article see link.

Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, has decided that it wants to sell organic food. They made the "big" announcement last week.
I just came back from giving the keynote, "If You Package It will They Buy," at Cal Poly Poly Pack 06 http://www.cppackaging.us/ last week. All of the audiences (the largest ever) questions revolved around the "green" movement in packaging.
I only know that the number of new "green" product announcements has increased dramatically and Wal-Mart is leading the charge.
Logically it makes sense that organic products would be packaged in some kind of environmentally friendly or natural material.
Other retail drivers are companies like the fast food giant McDonalds that are eyeing ways to attract new consumers or keep the ones they have.
Most important of all take in to consideration: What Wal-Mart Wants Wal-Mart Gets.


http://www.packagingessentials.com/news.asp?id=2006-05-18-08.05.11.000000

dawall - 18 May 2006 09:01 - 16645 of 27111

Does anyone know what price RHPS recommended buying at and whether they operate a 20% stop loss system? If so, in practice Tom Bulford and his subscribers should now either be already sold out or about to at the next update.

greekman - 18 May 2006 09:33 - 16646 of 27111

dawall,

RHPS have recommended SEO twice now, and yes TB is a great believer in a stop loss. Due to this he recommended sell some time back. He then put SEO back onto a watch list, and a few months later after meetings with SEO management re-recommended it as a buy. At the time I suggested that having once been bitten, a reputation was at stake, and I was of the opinion that to tip as a buy for a second time Tom would have had to be very sure of where this share was heading. He has always ( as far as I am aware ) put a high risk to this share.
Unfortunately I can't remember what he last tipped it at, so can't help you there.
I also feel that yes a lot of RHPS subscribers are now out, as many that follow that tip sheet are looking for quick profits, and their patience soon runs out.
All IMHO of course.

oblomov - 18 May 2006 09:51 - 16647 of 27111

My records show TB certainly had these on BUY at 17p (possibly higher) last September. The Target has never been changed from 50p and they only moved to a precautionery hold 13th April when SP was around 12.5p. They came back to a BUY 27th. April when SP was 13.25p but moved to a hold 4th. May at 12.75p.

Doesn't appear to be a stop loss in place - they have not been a sell since 2004. For some time now they have been tipped for their long term potential, so those RHPS subscribers looking for a quick profit wouldn't be attracted, IMO.

bosley - 18 May 2006 12:10 - 16648 of 27111

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

chart is looking worse than ever. 12p support gone. to those still holding, i certainly admire your balls ...... i just hope you've got a good grip on them ;)

oblomov - 18 May 2006 12:15 - 16649 of 27111

Register now or login to post to this thread.