Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


cynic - 21 May 2006 17:51 - 16770 of 27111

Sorry guys, but I do not try to ramp or even have any need to ...... I have a reasonably balanced portfolio and merely picked out some lower priced stocks from it..... By the way, it was you who suggested GOO, not I and, for all it matters, MRP is more interesting for its gas, MPH is a fashion house and GTL is of course a fossil-fuel alternative; that leaves 2 oil stocks from 5

andysmith - 21 May 2006 18:14 - 16771 of 27111

Eric, hold maybe a good call. The problem that I see for the sp is that the 12p support level from Feb 2005 placing has been broken and thats where a lot of the new buyers got in. Garyble's barrier quote seems OK if it can be verified but that is only comparing with OPP lids which is OK for products like chicken, however most other meats in Europe use higher barrier materials. I don't know what is used in USA, lets hope its all OPP though I doubt it. As before, best bet is the PS and PP tray replacement, no need for barrier and good volume potential that doesn't need Greenseal. PS is a major pain the arse as it can't be disposed of easily, some countries are already banning its use and thats why I personally would be happy to buy in on a deal with the likes of McDonalds for this application as other deals would follow.
The next week will see be a key indicator of market support for SEO IMO, yes the market went down last week but SEO was hit harder than most probably because the Greenseal potential was supposed to be realised by now with good profits so why should the market believe that Starpol story will be any different to Greenseal?
A deal with McDonalds (not trials) and I will be back in whether it be 6p or 12p. If the sp does fall back to the 6-7p mark then I'll be in anyway as SEO is in a much better position as a company with "potential products" and financially than they were 18 months ago.



oblomov - 21 May 2006 18:15 - 16772 of 27111

Cynic ,


It all comes down to whether you are



Or



On this one now IMO.

Tough times.

But, the shares you mention offer



I'd rather be in with a chance of

cynic - 21 May 2006 18:38 - 16773 of 27111

and SEO could well be a bar of melting Toblerone! ..... But I put my money where i like, and you guys likewise .... I recollect being wrongly lambasted elsewhere re my opinion of ELP; I would happily be correctly lambasted for my opinion on SEO as I have no wish to see others lose out

zscrooge - 21 May 2006 19:02 - 16774 of 27111

Overblown pretentious rock band!

bosley - 21 May 2006 19:40 - 16775 of 27111

trust you to blow a fanfare for the common man !!!

bosley - 21 May 2006 19:49 - 16776 of 27111

oblomov, is it really a question of whether you're a man or a mouse? yes, the sp is higher than what it was 2 years ago, but, it is now 70ish% down from its peak last year. in truth , the "men" sold when it peaked.

oblomov - 21 May 2006 20:58 - 16777 of 27111

Bos,

No not really, but I had a few spare pictures I wanted to use!

greekman - 22 May 2006 07:14 - 16778 of 27111

Less tolerance of waste gaining momentum.

Pocono Life
Zero waste movement takes hold
May 22, 2006

Exerts from article. See link for full article. http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060522/NEWS01/605220317/-1/NEWS#storyContinued

GrassRoots Recycling Network is calling on companies to take responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their products and packaging, and on governments to not subsidize non-recyclable waste processing.
Lombardi, a leading light in the fledgling U.S. zero waste movement, lays out four basic principles for achieving zero waste:

While the concept has been slow to catch on here, it has been standard practice in parts of Europe and elsewhere for more than a decade. In fact, some 25 countries require companies to take back their packaging, and some have gone so far as to mandate "extended producer responsibility" laws, whereby companies must pay for the waste generated in the production, packaging and distribution of their products. ( What a great idea. This would certainly focus companies minds ).

The less waste tide is continualy gathering monentum.





dawall - 22 May 2006 08:51 - 16779 of 27111

Does anyone know what price Fidelity paid for SEO shares and what their likely strategy would be now, to hold, add or sell off as stop losses are triggered?

greekman - 22 May 2006 08:58 - 16780 of 27111

I think Fidelity as most institution do will look at the long term prospects and hold.
Don't know what they bought at ( last purchase ), so can't help there.
The FTSE 100 is down again by 56 points, so with stop losses added to this it is not helping. The mm's are making a market as they do, and I expect plenty of bargain hunters at these prices.

Sharesure - 22 May 2006 09:51 - 16781 of 27111

This sell-off looks way over-done on stocks like SEO. With a product catalogue as good as theirs they must be looking appetisingly cheap to their competitors. Personally I would rather they get further down the road to commercialisation so that any bid process would start at a higher sp. Anyone any views on this thought?

Tonyrelaxes - 22 May 2006 10:20 - 16782 of 27111

S/s
Shares under direct or indirect control of the Directors, including exercisable Option Schemes, are in excess of 26% - possibly higher if they have other voting powers through Trustee schemes.
If a competitor sees a potential worth bidding for, would our Directors not know that potential as well or better?
In which case what reason would there be for them not to resist and block a bid ? Other than have an easier life now.
Tony

garyble - 22 May 2006 10:22 - 16783 of 27111

Sharesure,

As you say, they appear to have a great product catalogue, so in the event of a bid, what price would you consider to be a tempting off?

I would say most people here expect 50p to be achievable within a year, and once we're on that road the potential for further growth is considerable.

I recall a 70p bid for Ashtead being knocked back by the management about 3 years ago just ~3 months before they crashed to 2.5p. It took ~ 2 years, but they are now trading at ~220p.

Tonyrelaxes - 22 May 2006 10:26 - 16784 of 27111

Garyble - interesting analogy as our Chairman is also a Director of Ashtead.

Sharesure - 22 May 2006 10:41 - 16785 of 27111

Tony & Garyable, Good points. However, I would reckon that in the current market any would be predator could get a holding large enough to give them a very good negotiating position at well below 50p. I agree that that could represent a 'steal' but even current large holders like Howard White's family foundation might decide that certainty is worth considering; don't forget he has had a long time trying to pull off a major US deal and so far has not finalised anything.I know these things take a long time but if, as we think, the product range is as good as is said to be, it should be flying out of the door.

tweenie - 22 May 2006 10:50 - 16786 of 27111

DAN BROWN SHOULD TAKE A LONG LOOK AT THESE BOARDS BEFORE WRITING HIS NEXT NOVEL......
nothing re this share has changed in past month other than the SP.
more than happy to continue holding.

rpaco - 22 May 2006 12:09 - 16787 of 27111

Yeah every single fact he claims is true has since been disproved! Baldrick did a splendid program on it all last week.

I have hung on to my SEO stock for 2 years, but I now have serious doubts as to the management ability of those in charge. Undoubtedly they have the scientists engineers chemists etc, but the ability to plan their way out of a paper bag is beyond them. No further proof is needed than the Greenseal fiasco. Will they cock up Starpol 3 in the same manner? Very likely unless there is a distinct change in management ablities. We need some organisers and doers in there instead of bulshitters.

garyble - 22 May 2006 12:55 - 16788 of 27111

Get real would you. This stock has been over-inflated due to the over-excited. The management have thus far done very little wrong in my eyes, but will agree that we all have differing expectations. SEO were somewhat naive as they have admitted, but nothing has been abandoned or failed, so the game is very much still on.

Its laughable and predictable that at times such as these the whingers and prophets of doom come out in force.

This stock will remain volatile untill there is solid news with attached.

oblomov - 22 May 2006 13:51 - 16789 of 27111

Register now or login to post to this thread.