Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

RTD - Why? (RTD)     

Nitefly - 15 Sep 2003 10:55

Why are we again at 10.5p bid?

It doesn't add up...

Good Results + Strong buying pre results + Christmas online buying soon = Price drop

Then again some companies that have debt for equity hanging in the balance, poor results and bankruptcy around the corner and they go up!

Why sell now at a loss?

Wont that be a kick in the teeth when we see 13.5p 14p again!

Best of luck all.

Fred1new - 06 Nov 2004 20:27 - 1689 of 2406

I agree with the last part "Many ordinary people who do a lot of research can do a lot better than IC or shares mag."

But like me are often to lazy to do the research.

But I think IC is useful for ideas and points to shares in the market eye. But remember that tips are opinions not guaranties. As usual do you own researh.

Other people's jobs are always easier than one's own. Until one comes to do them.

1982roy - 07 Nov 2004 20:02 - 1690 of 2406

if tipsters were any good they would be bying shares not writing about them

scotinvestor - 07 Nov 2004 20:27 - 1691 of 2406

how do u get a job as a tipster in a magazine or a newspaper.
I'd love to be able to write about companies and get paid for it. I'd even take a cut compared to what some of the present tipsters r being paid.

moneyman - 07 Nov 2004 20:54 - 1692 of 2406

If anyone took notice of IC then SPS would not have been a double bagger ! At 30p IC said sell SPS....price now 62p !!

jules99 - 07 Nov 2004 23:54 - 1693 of 2406

I agree one must do there own research - tipsters are like critics...some you agree ith some you dont...analysts I dont always beleive but unfortunately sometimes one has to follow...

well done to rtd holders...

Douggie - 08 Nov 2004 09:17 - 1694 of 2406

mournin all looking like a down day,many sells so far! ;-/

Douggie - 08 Nov 2004 10:42 - 1695 of 2406

:-/

Fred1new - 08 Nov 2004 11:05 - 1696 of 2406

Cheer up Douggie. This is possibly just another RTD Wobble being performed, although the IC report may have put the dampers on it for while. (8-)

Douggie - 08 Nov 2004 11:11 - 1697 of 2406

IC report negative I presume..I dont have access

in the meantime falling like a lead baloon!!!!

:-[[

Fred1new - 08 Nov 2004 14:55 - 1698 of 2406

From memory Fairly price. Whatever that means. I think it was just slightly optimistic as a whole.

pachandl - 08 Nov 2004 15:47 - 1699 of 2406

There was nothing really negative in the IC report but it concluded that RTD was "fairly priced" because most of the growth was coming from the petrol card business in Australia. Moreover, I would assume that the negative retail figures today would have put a slight damper on RTD's progress anyway. From my point of view I would expect RTD to move sideways until there is evidence that another big retailer has signed them - which should not be too far away.

Douggie - 08 Nov 2004 17:48 - 1700 of 2406

pachandl... thanks for than info. :o)) Doug.

Douggie - 09 Nov 2004 10:24 - 1701 of 2406

:o)))

pachandl - 09 Nov 2004 14:41 - 1702 of 2406

Doug - I probably ought to know but what does :o))) mean? Signing on, signing off?

Fred1new - 09 Nov 2004 16:08 - 1703 of 2406

No. Just hoping with three legs crossed!

rampage - 09 Nov 2004 16:40 - 1704 of 2406

Stop braggin Fred
I can just about manage 2 and quarter

Fundamentalist - 09 Nov 2004 19:16 - 1705 of 2406

Pach - it means he's smiling greatly

pachandl - 10 Nov 2004 09:41 - 1706 of 2406

I think I will go with Fundamentalist's interpretation - but thanks for the interesting alternatives.

GINGERJIMMO - 10 Nov 2004 12:45 - 1707 of 2406

Could anyone explain the 3 large trades that went through but didn't show up in the trade totals? All over 200,000? Confused?

Fundamentalist - 10 Nov 2004 14:34 - 1708 of 2406

Ginger

they are listed as late trades as over NMS (normal market size) hence it is not possible to ascertain when the trade took place and whether it is a buy or sell
Register now or login to post to this thread.