this important referendum is nearly upon us and i thought it would be interesting explore the views held by this BB

after much thought, i have decided to vote against AV
i do not dispute that "first past post the post" is in some ways unfair - so is life and golf! - but i am far from convinced that AV is intrinsically much better

i would rather have a stronger gov't of some hue than a weak coalition or mps (and parties) who have felt obliged to trim their sails to offend the least number and thus gain a few more secondary votes

full-blown PR is at least "fair", but even then, there are many examples of horribly weak and unstable gov'ts, which is also pretty disastrous

finally, and of greatest concern, i suspect the turnout for this referendum will be +/-35% at best and probably a lot lower in many parts of the country
it follows that those who vote in this will be (relative) "activists" for lack of a better word, for the run-of-the-mill voter will find the whole thing too complicated and voting on it all, too much of a fag
thus, if there is a change in our voting system, then it is very likely to have been pushed through by <20% of the electorate - is that fair?

BM i agree . arsewipe is better

Tanker,

Was Ed looking at you when the photograph was taken.

I see Cameron and his henchmen are taking another quick open reverse on the NHS and Politically appointed Police "chiefs".

He must have read to many American comics in Eton. Not the only mess they are famous for.

I am sorry I am confusing new proposals with a review of policies.

It wasn't me gov., it was the previous Gov's policy.

HO HO HO.

f

.........

.

mna. so you agree he was just that a human not a profit .
just imagine putting [ paul daniels ] back in those times .
he would of been a god immortal

Although not knowing what went before, it would also seem a miracle.

.

.