maestro
- 14 Oct 2008 17:06
Here are the principal data that must be explained:
The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain (at free fall speed "collapse").
They underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.
The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers.
The rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars had only light damage.
The WTC mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends.
The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on our comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition.
The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up.
The demolition of WTC7 was whisper quiet and the seismic signal was no greater than background noise.
The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
The upper 90 percent, approximately, of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
File cabinet with folder dividers survived.
Office paper was densely spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often along side burning cars.
Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5 and 6, plus a cylindrical arc into Bankers Trust and into Liberty street in front of Bankers Trust.
All planes except top secret missions were ordered down until 10:31 a.m. (when only military flights were allowed to resume), after both towers were destroyed, and only two minutes after WTC 1 had been destroyed.
Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways, during the destruction of the Twin Towers.
The order and method of destruction of each tower minimized damage to the bathtub and adjacent buildings.
Twin Tower control without damaging neighboring buildings, in fact all seriously damaged or destroyed buildings had a WTC prefix, and no others.
The north wing of WTC 4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body which virtually disappeared.
The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the mass.
The WTC7 rubble pile was too small and contained a lot of mud.
Eyewitness testimony about toasted cars, instant disappearance of people by "unexplained" waves, a plane turning into a mid-air fireball, electrical power cut off moments before WTC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions.
There were many flipped cars in the neighborhood of the WTC complex near trees with full folliage.
* The possibility that a technology exists. Since invention of the microwave for cooking in 1945 and laser beam in 1955*, commercial and military development of beam technology has proceeded apace, so use of high-energy beams are likely
What explanations have been suggested to explain these phenomena?
Seven explanations have been identified:
Natural causes such as earthquakes and hurricanes
Arson
The official theory of airplane impact, fires and weakened steel collapsing
Conventional demolition with explosives such as RDX, dynamite, etc.
Demolition via thermite or its variants
Fission or fusion nukes (and clean bombs)
Beam weapons, energy weapons, directed-energy weapons (DEW)
(CCD-BiB) = "Conventional Controlled Demolition" with "Bombs in the Building"
Beam Weapons, Energy Weapons, and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW):
We have used the terms "beam weapons" and "directed energy weapons" to refer to unconventional weapons (exotic weapons) that are energy weapons. We broadly define DEW as Energy that is Directed and is used as a Weapon. The full range of these weapons is classified information, so we make no limits or distinction of categories within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of all that is available. In the following paragraph, we have listed some of the possibilities we are aware of.
Our critics have accused us of insisting that beam weapons did their damage from outer space, yet we make no claim about whether the directed energy weapon operated from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform. Nor do we make any claim about what wavelength(s) was used, what the source(s) of energy was, whether it involved interference of multiple beams, whether it involved sound waves, whether it involved sonoluminescence, whether it involved antimatter weapons, whether it involved scalar weapons, whether it was HAARP (more here and here), whether it involved a nuclear process (e.g. NDEW, more info), whether it involved conventional directed energy weapons (cDEW), whether it involved improvised directed energy weapons (iDEW), nor what kind of accelerator was used, nor do we claim to know what the serial numbers of the parts that were in the weapon(s).
What we do claim is that the evidence is consistent with the use of energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives and can be directed.
"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
Treblewide
- 21 Oct 2008 16:47
- 17 of 20
lol...
have you signed on yet maestro?
Clubman3509
- 21 Oct 2008 16:56
- 18 of 20
maestro - 21 Oct 2008 16:31 - 15 of 17
no i'm a wise human being who knows whats going on..now i'm free of possessions
You mean you are skint
thefraternity
- 21 Oct 2008 19:08
- 19 of 20
Maestro; Keep up the good work, David Icke and Dr Judy Wood will be proud of you. Another nutter who thinks the world is square and everyone is conspiring against them, I think the local looney bin has a phrase for them, normally strong medication is prescribed :-)
The Invisible Fraternity
martinl2
- 21 Oct 2008 19:14
- 20 of 20
"We laugh at sheep... but sheep need a sheepdog to keep them in line. We humans keep ourselves in line. We have out-sheeped the sheep."