What's a forum without people posting, some friendly banter and opposing views. By MAMs decision to remove the above posters we now have less views and these forums have lost their humour and rich content. I say bring back GF and DB immediately.

Please post your support if you agree?

Two posters I have always got on very well with. I do not post on other Boards, so not my problem what goes on, on them. Very far from pleasant what has been said on some of the threads on moneyam . I would hope DB and GF read the Foxtons (FOXT) thread and hope they would agree some pretty distasteful/disgusting words have been said and pictures placed on the thread, do serious investors want to read these abusive arguments and should they have too ? Yes I would like to see them posting the good and sensible posts we are used to on here. Do not know the way forward ?

"...with all the generic crap posted on these forums." That's the difference between Traders and Investors, surely? Some people want a 15 min price chart, some want a 1 year chart. Maybe the two don't mix on the same Forum then?

Maybe a cool down period is required of say 48hrs in these cases then.

It would seam more appropriate to me.

Some people seem to be willing to put up with abuse on here so that they can copy trade goldie, thats ok but come out and say it , don't hide behind your willingness to have him back is not to make money

Democracy rules, ok! Ok? Um.............,well maybe! :o)

you're not allowed to vote twice ..... electoral fraud!

As Shortie says it seems to be one rule for some and not others, so suggest from now on that all people who post abusive posts against other posters get "a warning" and are then banned for a month if they transgress.

Once back if they transgress again it's a two month ban and so on... that will sort them out.

All in favour say yes.

Shortie

RE -There will be no further charts or technical analysis posted from me until this is concluded to the benefit of MAM members.

What is good for you maybe NOT good for others, but my experience says "do not understimate your opponent", so no threats

10 days for starters ..... but "abuse" within reason is ok and if it dies quickly - ie no more than handbagging

Trust Alf to find something wrong with it -):

So who's broadly in favour of my suggestion?

My time reading of threads from " Goldfinger " is not good as he goes over the TOP and if necesary will hunt you down with "LIES" to get other believe his point ( I have prove )

Worse yet at "ADVFN" where his antics are really out of order and going on for years

So the conclution is not only one off, in this case is very difficut to change your long term behaviour


"Doodlebug " I do not have so much to go by, though I think is more a "piss taker" than anything else mainly directed to the other GF were as far as I see comes from arguments mainly at other places

thats 4 neys 3 ayes, and 2 don't knows and 1 mediator (stan)

an interesting observation indeed from mentor!

How do you work that out BB, only 3 including yourself have commented since my post.

AYE AYE AYE

YES YES YES YES


That make 10/4 + Stan's

-):

No NO NO No No NO NO NO!! :0)

...Any more for any more then -):

in a way, many have not quite answered the question, that being should GF (and DB by default) have been red carded as opposed to yellow?

you may or may not like one or other of the characters, or indeed some of their comments, but does that therefore mean we should have an anodyne board where everyone is frightfully nice?

There are rules/guidelines in place that all posters should adhere to, any transgressions should be stamped on by MAM at the earliest opportunity with a warning as to future behaviour. The problem here as I see it was that the abuse which resulted in GF and DB4's removal was allowed to continue for far too long.
From a personal view I would like to see both back. We are all responsible adults and should behave as such, for those who are irritating there is the squelch button. That's my feelings aired.
2517