cynic
- 12 Sep 2013 16:31
- 17 of 320
why is it bad for customers?
for that matter, why do the unions reckon it's bad for them?
has privatised gas or water been bad for the customer?
in many ways no, though it's impossible to determine whether pricing would have been any less if left in state ownership
has privatised rail been bad for the customer?
on balance, probably yes, but i don't recollect it was much chop before, and heaven knows what fun the militant unions would have had
Stan
- 12 Sep 2013 16:42
- 18 of 320
You are far to immature to respond to, particularly on this subject.
cynic
- 12 Sep 2013 16:46
- 19 of 320
is that so?
you mean you totally disagree? ..... well that's your prerogative, but there's no need to be so immature in your response
i wonder if there will be any increase in thieving once the mail is privatised?
btw, weren't the docks state-owned many years ago?
if so, privatising those has been magical on almost all fronts
Stan
- 12 Sep 2013 16:51
- 20 of 320
Yes, it is so, you really must get some help for your own good and people around you, I'm assuming that there are people around you of course.
cynic
- 12 Sep 2013 16:58
- 21 of 320
what a wondrous intelligent response from you stan, but then i think you're a close buddy of findus, so i shouldn't be surprised
Stan
- 12 Sep 2013 17:00
- 22 of 320
Thank you.
cynic
- 12 Sep 2013 17:03
- 23 of 320
so tell me stan, are the unions afraid that (a) their power will become fragmented in that sector and/or (b) jobs will go with no decrease in efficiency?
Stan
- 12 Sep 2013 17:06
- 24 of 320
See post 18.
cynic
- 12 Sep 2013 17:08
- 25 of 320
ah! another ignorant response from you
if you don't know the answers, just say so; no one will think any the worse of you
rekirkham
- 12 Sep 2013 17:11
- 26 of 320
Did not Mrs Thatcher or someone want to sell off the Royal Mail some years ago ?
Why has it not happened sooner ?
I can not recall for sure. Maybe I am getting old and senile ?
cynic
- 12 Sep 2013 17:13
- 27 of 320
you're right, but for whatever reason, she reckoned it was too big a task
mitzy
- 12 Sep 2013 17:13
- 28 of 320
She said she would not sell something with the Queens head on a stamp or something.
Stan
- 12 Sep 2013 17:14
- 29 of 320
"I cannot recall for sure. Maybe I am getting old and senile ?" possibly -):
Thatcher actually said something like "selling the RM off was a step to far"
Stan
- 12 Sep 2013 17:17
- 30 of 320
I asked this of someone else on another thread Cynic, Have you considered dropping dead at all lately?
cynic
- 12 Sep 2013 17:21
- 31 of 320
tell me stan, have you ever thought of making other than ignorant comment?
perhaps you feel vulnerable or inadequate because you cannot answer some fairly basic questions raised
Stan
- 12 Sep 2013 17:25
- 32 of 320
I refer you again to post 18.
cynic
- 12 Sep 2013 17:29
- 33 of 320
dear oh dear!
that's about as pathetic an answer as it gets
stan the man (or mouse) is clearly totally bereft of any answers let alone an ability to admit ignorance where he has no answers
rekirkham
- 12 Sep 2013 17:30
- 34 of 320
I will drop dead - if someone will volunteer to pay my funeral expenses.
Please advise soonest as I am presently in good health
Stan
- 12 Sep 2013 17:31
- 35 of 320
It's nearly tea time and it's your turn, so off with you -):
Stan
- 12 Sep 2013 17:33
- 36 of 320
Ask Cynic to pay rk, he seems flush with all the holidays he seems to take.