Osmetech acquired the Opti product line from Roche Diagnostics. Opti is the portable analysis technology for bloodgas and electrolytes measurement. This highly successful analyser has also taken the veterinary world by storm. IDEXX Laboratories Inc (IDXX) have entered into a ten year OEM agreement to provide the customised OPTI analysers to the veterinary field under the brand VetStat.

In September 2004 the company acquired the "OPTIgene" (Genedrive) product from MS this technology will enable OMH a strong entry point into the fastest growing market segment of DNA based diagnostics. A market that is growing at an annual rate of 20% and is currently worth $ 22 bln !

In the latest acquisition 1/7/05 Osmetech acquired Clinical Micro Sensors from Motorola PLC, OMH plans to utilise the eSensor technology coupled with OPTIgene to address the majority of existing and new tests in the genetic diagnostics market. 'CMS's diagnostic tests for cystic fibrosis and CYP450 are closest to commercial launch and OMH believes that these products have significant market potential.

Scroll & Click for Websites & Other LinksRT Mag Wall Street Reporter Interviews JW

Up Coming Events in 2006

CMS CYP450 product Launch!!!!!............................................. 2006

IDEXX critical care platform Launch!!!!!....................................2006/7....much more to follow

Click Here to Track Osmetech's Progress in the "Stocks That Could Double in 2006" Competition

Minor treeshake today. Good buying opertunity IMO

Motorola, have sold their shares in the Company (212,470,862 pre consolidation so now 21,247,086) but only got 20p each for them. 6 months to the day the earlyest they could sell them.
Exact number of the big trade today.
Buy early these will go up friday.

Good prognosis

Keep an eye on healthcare diagnostics group Osmetech. That was the word among market professionals last night after a large stock overhang was cleared. Evolution Securities placed 21m shares - around 16% of the company - at 20p on behalf of Motorola with a variety of City institutions and private client brokers. Motorola's shareholding dates back to the summer when it sold its Clinical Micro Sensors business to Osmetech. With the Motorola holding out of the way, traders were expecting the stock to rally this morning. Earlier this week Osmetech, which recently appointed Hoare Govett as its broker, received American regulatory clearance for its cystic fibrosis carrier detection test. Yesterday Osmetech shares lost 4.5p, or 14.5%, to close at 26.25p.

In other words everything is on track and dont be panicked into selling!

From todays RNS
Osmetech has no further information to add to its Trading Update of 19 January
2006 and the FDA clearance of the CMS eSensor cystic fibrosis test announced on
24 January 2006.

Ends

Double post

The Latest Wallstreet Reporter Interview with Jame White (Thanks to DP)

Osmetech firmed 0.75p to 24.5p amid talk that testing of its cystic fibrosis diagnostics kit is ahead of schedule.

Just announced.

Osmetech Plc Notice of Results
RNS Number:8280Y
Osmetech PLC
23 February 2006



Notification of Final Results announcement



Osmetech, the international medical devices and diagnostics group, is to
announce its preliminary results for the 8 months to 31 December 2005 on Tuesday
21st March 2006.



As previously announced, Osmetech has now changed to a December financial year
end. As a result there was no interim results statement for the 6 months ended
31 October 2005.



Enquiries:

Mark Way

madano partnership 020 7593 4000

Last time we had a months notice of the results was the 30 June 2003.
The price on that date was 32p. The price dropped initially to 29p on the 2nd July before recovering and hitting a peak of 50p on the 28th July.

By the time of the results on the 30 July 2003 the price had fallen back to 43p.

I made sh1t loads of money that month!

Bring it on this time!

Bangers are you running a challenge here?

Well here's the price predictions from the OMH thread on a competitors site. If there's any Osmetech share holders here that would like to join in the just post your price guess for the EOD price on the day before the results - 20th March 2006. Competition closes 16:30 today.

Guess the price EOD on the 20th Mar 06. Current Average Guess = 35.5p!!

Poster's Name Price Youcorksuckers 48p JamesDean 43.2p Tradingplenty 43p Galco 41.5p Bangers 40p Ditchpig 39.75p Bucketfull 39p Muffster 39p CHESTERONE 38.75p bcfcruleok 38.25p Canaries 38p bleunose 37.5p cricketmad 37.5p Freddyfrog 37p eurojaws 36.75p Biofish 36.5p boonyed 36.5p REDHILL 36p Protec 35.5p Jacinta 34.5p tanchos 34.25p Gerry2 34p troutisout 33.5p Hutchmeister 33p BennyTheBall 33p sequoia 33p The Explorer 32.5p lomac 31.5p Rosco 29.5p The Novice 29p PC 27.75p C Moggie 27p HoT 20p

Looks good to me. I've tipped at 39.75p though that might be a little conservative now.

Just a quick glance back over the historic chart patterns shows that OMH can and does make some huge moves prior to the results. Rises of 50 -75% have been seen in a space of the few weeks prior to the figures release.

Interestingly a poster on ADVFN has estimated that the takeout value of Osmetech could be in the region of 500m or about 3.80 a share.
That's based on the value Becton Dickinson paid for GeneOhm at 46x revenues purely revenues from their PCR buisness of $5 million. Osmetech revenues from the blood gas critical care side of the buisness already exceed $5 million and with the imminent launch of OPTIgene and eSensor Osmetech group revenues are expected to greatly exceed that figure very rapidly.

Should see a significant rise on Monday on the back of todays Telegraph write up. It seems that a few of the national papers are keeping a close eye on OMH (Osmetech)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2006/03/18/ccmed18.xml&menuId=242&sSheet=/money/2006/03/18/ixcoms.html

New ways to cut the error out of drug trials
By Katherine Griffiths (Filed: 18/03/2006)

Better understanding of our DNA and other high-tech advances will make medical research less risky, says Katherine Griffiths

As the families of six men seriously ill from taking an experimental leukaemia drug wait anxiously for news of whether they will recover, a question doctors and the public will ask is if this tragedy could have been prevented.

The answer is, perhaps, yes. It is too early to say for certain, because it is not yet known what caused the terrible reactions in the human volunteers to the drug TGN1412. There could have been problems with the medicine, but equally it could have been someone giving the wrong dose or a toxic substance getting into its production which was to blame.

Some in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries say if it is the drug which turns out to have been the problem, such a tragedy might not have to be repeated. This is because tests that show to a far greater extent than ever before what a drug will do to a human before it is injected into the body are now at the cutting edge of research and development.

The wealth of new information about the way the body works from breakthrough discoveries about our DNA is making these new techniques ever more useful.

The new technologies, most of them still only being worked on by a handful of small companies around the world, which sound more like science fiction than reliable scientific tests, are rapidly being built on top of that foundation.

The methodologies range from computer modelling involving highly complex mathematics to testing drugs on hearts taken from people killed in traffic accidents and kept alive in boxes.

Analysts say these techniques are on the brink of explosive growth, with large pharmaceuticals companies waking up to the fact that they can massively speed up the drug development process and also make it much cheaper, because dud medicines can be scrapped at an earlier stage.

The devastating events at Northwick Park Hospital in north London, which have left two men in a coma and four others still seriously ill, will also inevitably act as a catalyst in getting regulators and public opinion to put pressure on drug developers to turn to new and more sophisticated tests.

Most experts in the pharmaceuticals industry believe such developments will not replace the current system, where drugs are tested in laboratories, then on animals and then in three phases of human trials.

But a growing number believe the traditional system could be greatly improved by adding a range of new tests, especially at the stage when a drug has been given to animals but not yet been introduced as a phase 1 trial in people.

Ibraheem Mahmood, a lifesciences analyst at Investec, points to the emerging field of testing unknown drugs on human organs taken from people who have died from other causes as an area of huge future significance.

"In five or 10 years' time the world's pharmaceuticals and biotechnology companies will still be running the same animal and phase 1 trials but they will also have a battery of supporting tests that provide greater insight into the results of these tests. We'll be able to make much better decisions before committing to large and expensive risky trials," Mr Mahmood said.

One developer of this technique, known as "ex vivo", is a small company called Asterand, which is operating in both both Detroit in the United States and Royston, Hertfordshire, a few miles south of Cambridge.

The company takes tissue from a variety of sources, including accident victims, and from people who have donated their organs which turn out not to be good enough, and either supplies them to drugs companies for tests or does the tests itself.

Ronald Openshaw, Asterand's chief financial officer, said TeGenero, the German company which made TGN1412, was not a client, so it was impossible to tell exactly what tests were done on the drug apart from the animal tests required by regulators before the drug was tried out in humans.

But he said: "That whole bitterly disappointing situation raises the issue of if there was anything else that could have been done."

Mr Openshaw argues that Asterand's technology does, at least in some circumstances, catch such situations. He cited the example of a client which had brought a drug to Asterand for testing.

"The drug had been in pre-clinical development and they thought it caused cardiac toxicity.

"We took some heart muscle and put it in an organ bath where it could be kept beating and effectively alive for three days. We tested the drug on it and found it did have side effects," Mr Openshaw said.

Asterand will not reveal the identity of the company because it keeps all of its clients confidential, but it did say it was a large player in the pharmaceuticals sector which, after it received the results of the trial from Asterand, dropped the drug.

Asterand, which has just 100 employees and has been gradually developing its techniques for the past eight years, says it is now being overwhelmed with demand from large drug companies that want to use its techniques.

Another arena where small developmental companies are finding themselves in demand is in an area known as molecular diagnostics. Thanks to the wealth of information now available about the human genome, companies can work out with far greater precision what a drug will do to a particular person based on their genetic make-up.

A company working in this area is the Boston-based Osmetech. Among the products the company has developed is something called an Esensor, a machine which uses DNA technology.

It is also developing something called an Optigene, a piece of equipment slightly bigger than a laptop computer which will help scientists in labs and doctors in hospitals find information such as a person's metabolism. Such relatively simple information can make a lot of difference in deciding on what dose to give a patient and even whether the medicine will work at all.

The reasons why these areas are some of the fastest growing in the drugs industry are not hard to find. Pharmaceutical companies have to pay more than 500m to bring a single drug from its earliest stages through a multiplicity of tests to the market.

Adopting tests that can determine at an early stage whether the treatment will work in humans or not could save millions of pounds. It is possible that it could also save lives.

16 March 2006[News]: Drug trial victim is like Elephant Man, says girlfriend

Any rise will be down to the results due on Tuesday not an article in the Telegraph.

astonvilla

Watch and learn...it's called DYOR...great find bangersmam.

astonvilla - squelched

yeah good post bangers but why will the share price be affected by an article in Telegraph 1 day before results with only a small mention to OMH? You said a significant rise. Lots of interesting posts and research on a competitors message board which you are a member. DYOR and dont ramp with outrageous comments. OMH are establishing a sound product base with sales. This share price will only go one way and that is up. DYOR.....update......where was this substantial rise....mid price never moved? Lets hope tomorrows results raise the profile of OMH. I've topped up.

Results Out On Tuesday