Why are we again at 10.5p bid?

It doesn't add up...

Good Results + Strong buying pre results + Christmas online buying soon = Price drop

Then again some companies that have debt for equity hanging in the balance, poor results and bankruptcy around the corner and they go up!

Why sell now at a loss?

Wont that be a kick in the teeth when we see 13.5p 14p again!

Best of luck all.

Cheers Fundamentalist!

Pach

In basic terms RTD is a SEAQ stock - ie totally down to market maker prices. The 5 v 1 means that 5 are prepared to buy your stock at 19 while only 1 will sell you stock at 19.75. That is positive because if the 1 decides to up their sell to 20p the price will tick up to 19p vs 20p. Im not a great user of level 2 but it can give you an idea if a tick up/down is coming especially on a more volatile stock/day.

Hope this helps

RTD is "Play of the Week" in Shares mag today folks - get in quick if you want to buy :-))))

The well argued report in Shares is favourable. The Price is up. But have a look at ratio of Buys to Sells.

I know I am stupid, (My family inform me this frequently of this fact.) but I would expect that volume of Buys to sells to go with the price change. I know it mught be MMs expectations against punters relief in getting out at a good price compared to their buying price.


I still think this company is undervalued with a huge potential for increasing earnings. Also going back through the actions of the board they results seem to accord with their statements. That is not saying back in the Tech bubble that they were gloriously over priced. (Got out just before the pin prick and bought back low.) I think this is a Warren Buffet type share, ie., let it run unless some calamity occurs.

Have a nice day Douggie. :=)))

Fred

just read the shares article.

Couple of points i picked out:

1) They appear to be arguing the fundamentals based on the EPS/PE using profit before ammortisation and exceptionals - personally not too comfy with this approach

2) 10% EPS growth to me is laughable - if that is all that we can expect then it is time to find a real growth share!!! Personal opinion is that EPS growth based on the last couple of years trading will be far higher than 10%.

3) Interesting to see mention of potential expansion of the fuel card business into Europe (though agree highly competitive and may have to pay over the odds)

4) The focus of the CNP business comes across in the article as mainly UK geared whereas we know the geographic spread is far higher than that

5) Comparisons to the general software sector can be misleading, as the business valuation really needs to be done in two parts with the fuel business valuation and the fraud software valuations being added together to get an overall valuation. Comparisons to more specific comparators show that the fraud part of the business should be trading on far higher than a PE of 16

6) No mention of the alleged patent infringement at all

As for the buy/sells data this can always be misleading - they may be filling a large buy order for all we know. It is standard for tipped shares to be marked up then fall back a few days later.

Also, from a chart perspective, there has been mention on other bb's that a double bottom has been formed which is a very bullish sign. For me, in the short term breaking through the resistance at 21.5p is more important though we may have to wait for further announcements (contracts or litigation) to provide momentum before the end of December trading update

All IMHO DYOR etc etc

Fundamentalist. Thank you have printed it out and will look again. As you say there may be resistance at 21+-. I still a holder!

Catching up!

But/Sells are misleading - Comdirect are quoting 19.75 - 20.15 (Widened from earlier 19.8 - 20.10) Many sells shown are actually buys.

As no chart expert can you advise where this double bottom is? Are we looking arounf the 19p mark or at 14p etc?

Flackwell - likewise no chart expert but i believe the double bottom is at 18.75p over the last fortnight

Thank you - The problem I have with charts is that had the second drop stopped at 18.5p, or 18.0p would that constitute a double bottom?

If it wouldn't then what makes a double bottom so postive a signal?

FV

My novice interpretation is that if it had stopped at say 18p then it would have formed a lower low (and a short term downtrend) which is bearish but i dare say a more expert chartist will correct me

Buy note out from Paul Scott in UK-Analyst just now.

My amateurish opinion is that the double-bottom was at 13.00 (Aug-Oct) - I think that you are reading too much into short-term charts if you believe that it is at 18.75 - 8 days seems a very short time for a db to form. IMHO and so I am happy to be proven wrong.

Buy Retail Decisions at 20.25p
Argues small company expert Paul Scott
This investment idea continues the theme of my recent article on Fayrewood, and highlights what I believe is another example of a growth company, trading well, which the market has priced too low.

Retail Decisions plc describes itself as a specialist niche supplier to the payments industry. The group website is worth a look, and can be found at www.redplc.com .

By far the most profitable division is the Australian fuel cards business, which claims market leadership. Other divisions focus mainly on card payment processing & fraud prevention, especially in the rapidly growing Cardholder Not Present ("CNP") sub sector (e.g. internet transactions). This is very much a "hot" sector of the market at the moment, as investors recognise the scope for rapid growth, however RTD seems to have been overlooked until recently.

Retail Decisions has a market capitalisation of 56.7 million pounds, based on 290.6 million shares at 19.5p .

As always, I've put my money where my mouth is, and hold over half a million shares in RTD. One reader asked if I receive any kind of remuneration for writing articles for uk-analyst.com. The answer is no.

Positive Trading

A fortnight ago on 28th October, RTD issued a very positive trading update by RNS, which announced that;

"the Board expects the Group's full year profit before exceptional costs to be materially in excess of current market expectations"

As you would expect, this announcement triggered a significant rise in the share price, from a recent low of around 13p to 19p. Some investors may (understandably) baulk at buying the shares after a near-50% rise in price, but one has to weigh up what value to place on the additional comfort of knowing for sure that the company is trading very well.

At the very least I am suggesting adding RTD to your watch list, and buying on any pullback in price. To quantify things, original market expectations look to have been around 1.5p EPS for 2004, and the actual figure (adj. EPS) for 2003 was 1.4p, so it would seem sensible to pencil in around say 1.8p adj. EPS for 2004 as a realistic target (possibly more). This 1.8p estimate puts the shares, at 19p on a PER of just 10.6, which seems a bargain to me, for a growth company that is performing well.



What is driving profits upwards ?

Firstly, the bulk of profits come from the Australian fuel card business. A higher oil price is great news for RTD, as fuel cards work on a per transaction fee, which is a fixed percentage of the transaction value. Hence higher oil & fuel prices, means directly higher profits for RTD.

Fraud prevention & payment processing are the other, less profitable divisions, but things seem to be coming together there as well. The recent update says that trading has been "very strong" in this division.

The product most likely to excite the market, is RTD's "ebitGuard" product, for online payments & fraud prevention. Transactions grew by 168% in 2003, and it has some big name clients, including Walmart.com . The beauty here is that the infrastructure is in place to handle a lot more business without taking on more costs.

This is a big growth area, not only because online payments are growing in volume, but also because the UK's move to Chip & Pin is likely to shift fraud away from retailers, towards online transactions, hence drive demand for RTD's products. RTD also benefited in 2003 from sharp cost-cutting, with a useful 1.5 million pounds added to profits from a reduction in staff costs.

Churning out cashflow
When reading the Annual Report for RTD, I was struck by just how cash generative this business is. EBITDA was 5.9 million pounds in 2003, and increased to 3.8 million pounds for the 6 months to 30/6/2004.

Given that trading has since improved further, it now looks as if RTD is churning out around 8 million pounds p.a. in EBITDA (i.e. operating cashflow before distortions from working capital changes).

Consider that the market capitalisation is 56.7 million pounds (at 19.5p a share), and the attraction to a predator or Venture Capitalist is obvious.

Net cash had reached 6.3 million pounds by 30/6/2004, and this will probably have risen to around 10 million pounds by the year-end. That would reduce the Enterprise Value to just 46.7 million pounds, and result in a net cash adjusted PER of around 8.9 (based on my 1.8p EPS forecast for 2004).

At the moment there is no dividend, but it would be a relatively simple matter to restructure reserves in order to start paying dividends.

Consider also that there are no reported greater than 3% shareholdings, not even by management, and clearly this would be a relatively easy target for a predator to snap up.

Its not all good news

There is the uncertainty of litigation hanging over RTD. This knocked about 3p off the share price back in August 2004.

Whilst these things are always a nightmare for investors to prejudge, so far the signs seem positive for RTD. A NASDAQ-listed competitor, CyberSource (NASDAQ: CYBS) has filed an action in the US claiming that RTD's ebitGuard product infringes one of its Patents.

The latest RNS from RTD is encouraging, and says that RTD is "vigorously defending" itself, and has found evidence which may undermine the competitor's Patent.

Given that CyberSource is capitalised at $215m, and on a PER of 129.2, one wonders why CyberSource don't just buy RTD instead of suing them. This would make obvious sense, as such a move would be immediately earnings enhancing for the bidder.

In Summary

Good points

Trading very well
Growth sector
Low valuation (net cash adjusted PER of 8.9)
Competitors on high valuations (esp. NASDAQ)
Possibility of corporate action due to valuation anomaly
Scope to start paying divis soon ?
Strong balance sheet
Very good cashflow
Pension fund deficit - none. Defined contribution scheme(s) only
Shares fairly liquid - easy to trade in blocks of 100,000 shares
Bad points

Management shareholdings are too low
Uncertainty over CyberSource litigation
Shares have risen 50% in past fortnight, so may be best to wait for a pullback before buying
Bulletin Board punters' favourite stock, so price can be volatile
Buy at 20.25p.

Share price: 19.75 - 20.5p

Stockmarket: LSE

Symbol: RTD

Paul Scott trained as a chartered accountant and then moved into industry spending nine years as finance director of a private clothing retailer with around 150 shops. He has been investing for over five years and is now a professional investor specialising mainly in smaller companies. Since starting to invest full time in October 2002 Paul's portfolio has risen over 500%. Paul's website at www.scottcapital.co.uk gives more details of his activities

Buy Retail Decisions at 20.25p
Argues small company expert Paul Scott
This investment idea continues the theme of my recent article on Fayrewood, and highlights what I believe is another example of a growth company, trading well, which the market has priced too low.

Retail Decisions plc describes itself as a specialist niche supplier to the payments industry. The group website is worth a look, and can be found at www.redplc.com .

By far the most profitable division is the Australian fuel cards business, which claims market leadership. Other divisions focus mainly on card payment processing & fraud prevention, especially in the rapidly growing Cardholder Not Present ("CNP") sub sector (e.g. internet transactions). This is very much a "hot" sector of the market at the moment, as investors recognise the scope for rapid growth, however RTD seems to have been overlooked until recently.

Retail Decisions has a market capitalisation of 56.7 million pounds, based on 290.6 million shares at 19.5p .

As always, I've put my money where my mouth is, and hold over half a million shares in RTD. One reader asked if I receive any kind of remuneration for writing articles for uk-analyst.com. The answer is no.

Positive Trading

A fortnight ago on 28th October, RTD issued a very positive trading update by RNS, which announced that;

"the Board expects the Group's full year profit before exceptional costs to be materially in excess of current market expectations"

As you would expect, this announcement triggered a significant rise in the share price, from a recent low of around 13p to 19p. Some investors may (understandably) baulk at buying the shares after a near-50% rise in price, but one has to weigh up what value to place on the additional comfort of knowing for sure that the company is trading very well.

At the very least I am suggesting adding RTD to your watch list, and buying on any pullback in price. To quantify things, original market expectations look to have been around 1.5p EPS for 2004, and the actual figure (adj. EPS) for 2003 was 1.4p, so it would seem sensible to pencil in around say 1.8p adj. EPS for 2004 as a realistic target (possibly more). This 1.8p estimate puts the shares, at 19p on a PER of just 10.6, which seems a bargain to me, for a growth company that is performing well.



What is driving profits upwards ?

Firstly, the bulk of profits come from the Australian fuel card business. A higher oil price is great news for RTD, as fuel cards work on a per transaction fee, which is a fixed percentage of the transaction value. Hence higher oil & fuel prices, means directly higher profits for RTD.

Fraud prevention & payment processing are the other, less profitable divisions, but things seem to be coming together there as well. The recent update says that trading has been "very strong" in this division.

The product most likely to excite the market, is RTD's "ebitGuard" product, for online payments & fraud prevention. Transactions grew by 168% in 2003, and it has some big name clients, including Walmart.com . The beauty here is that the infrastructure is in place to handle a lot more business without taking on more costs.

This is a big growth area, not only because online payments are growing in volume, but also because the UK's move to Chip & Pin is likely to shift fraud away from retailers, towards online transactions, hence drive demand for RTD's products. RTD also benefited in 2003 from sharp cost-cutting, with a useful 1.5 million pounds added to profits from a reduction in staff costs.

Churning out cashflow
When reading the Annual Report for RTD, I was struck by just how cash generative this business is. EBITDA was 5.9 million pounds in 2003, and increased to 3.8 million pounds for the 6 months to 30/6/2004.

Given that trading has since improved further, it now looks as if RTD is churning out around 8 million pounds p.a. in EBITDA (i.e. operating cashflow before distortions from working capital changes).

Consider that the market capitalisation is 56.7 million pounds (at 19.5p a share), and the attraction to a predator or Venture Capitalist is obvious.

Net cash had reached 6.3 million pounds by 30/6/2004, and this will probably have risen to around 10 million pounds by the year-end. That would reduce the Enterprise Value to just 46.7 million pounds, and result in a net cash adjusted PER of around 8.9 (based on my 1.8p EPS forecast for 2004).

At the moment there is no dividend, but it would be a relatively simple matter to restructure reserves in order to start paying dividends.

Consider also that there are no reported greater than 3% shareholdings, not even by management, and clearly this would be a relatively easy target for a predator to snap up.

Its not all good news

There is the uncertainty of litigation hanging over RTD. This knocked about 3p off the share price back in August 2004.

Whilst these things are always a nightmare for investors to prejudge, so far the signs seem positive for RTD. A NASDAQ-listed competitor, CyberSource (NASDAQ: CYBS) has filed an action in the US claiming that RTD's ebitGuard product infringes one of its Patents.

The latest RNS from RTD is encouraging, and says that RTD is "vigorously defending" itself, and has found evidence which may undermine the competitor's Patent.

Given that CyberSource is capitalised at $215m, and on a PER of 129.2, one wonders why CyberSource don't just buy RTD instead of suing them. This would make obvious sense, as such a move would be immediately earnings enhancing for the bidder.

In Summary

Good points

Trading very well
Growth sector
Low valuation (net cash adjusted PER of 8.9)
Competitors on high valuations (esp. NASDAQ)
Possibility of corporate action due to valuation anomaly
Scope to start paying divis soon ?
Strong balance sheet
Very good cashflow
Pension fund deficit - none. Defined contribution scheme(s) only
Shares fairly liquid - easy to trade in blocks of 100,000 shares
Bad points

Management shareholdings are too low
Uncertainty over CyberSource litigation
Shares have risen 50% in past fortnight, so may be best to wait for a pullback before buying
Bulletin Board punters' favourite stock, so price can be volatile
Buy at 20.25p.

Why so little interest ? People tucking them away for the future ?

g'day all nice rise while I'v bin away, now I'm back!!! ;-/ red again \-:

Pachandl... :o)))) = well pleased, ;-\ wry smile !

I thought you must have been on holidays again.

I thought holidays were good for the health!!!!!