bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
EWRobson
- 02 Jun 2006 13:06
- 17122 of 27111
garyble: I had been going by the same statement. This refers to new machines, the first going in within 8 weeks (of 10 May). The AGM statement said 8 weeks to first commercial installation (from 2 May). Today's statement refers to Multivac conversion machines going well in trials and that Proseal AP60 'currently being converted for Hitchin Foods is consistently performing in our factory in Southampton having run for 8 hours continuously for several days without any issues'. These machines will presumably be finally commissioned when the trials are complete and machines operational on site - this depends on this fact and not an 80 day period. Therefore the earlier statements would appear to apply to the new machine(s). Do you agree? Whichever way, we do seem to be coming up to speed, although still in first gear!
Eric
explosive
- 02 Jun 2006 13:49
- 17123 of 27111
End of the day the news is all positive and forward moving, I'm still confident that momentumn will increase once the technology is being used. Still in first gear as Eric points out but we could well be in second come August.
WOODIE
- 02 Jun 2006 13:56
- 17124 of 27111
copy of email received i tried to get the answer some of you wanted but the company would not play ball
"We are unable to answer specific questions at present due to stock exchange rules we are also in a closed period."
Best regards
Sylvia Leavey
Corporate Executive Secretary & HR Manager
Stanelco plc
edit the question i asked was what was the money raised to be used for
Cantlose
- 02 Jun 2006 14:05
- 17125 of 27111
garyble
Extract from RNS 5/9/2005
"Stanelco, the RF (radio frequency) applications group, is pleased to announce
that the acquisition of Biotec Holdings GmbH and subsidiaries ('Biotec') from E.
Khashoggi Industries LLC ('EKI') has now been completed. Following the
acquisition, the Company has now completed the sale of a 50% stake in Biotec to
SP Metal S.A. ('SP Metal'), thereby creating a joint venture (the 'JV'). SP
Metal is the leading European manufacturer of household packaging products.
Details of the JV were included in the initial announcement made on 5th July
2005.
Extract from RNS 5/7/2005
"Stanelco plc, the RF (radio frequency) applications group, is pleased to
announce that it has binding Heads of Agreement with SP Metal the leading
European manufacturer of household packaging products, for the sale of a 50%
interest in Biotec Holdings GmbH and subsidiaries ('Biotec'). Payment to
Stanelco will be satisfied through an initial consideration of US$6.25m in cash
with a further US$6.25m to be paid in two equal instalments payable on the 12th
and 24th months after closing. The deferred payments are not subject to the
satisfaction of performance criteria.
The consideration received by Stanelco will be used to fund 50% of the Biotec
acquisition as announced by Stanelco on 6th June 2005."
My understanding of the above is that SEO bought Biotec for $25m less $12.5m then sold on 50% to SP Metal.That leaves $12.5m due from SEO to EKI spread over 2 instalments(less $6.25m from SP Metal to SEO over 2 instalments).
The net effect is that SEO owe EKI $6.25m ($3.125m on 6/6/06 & $3.125m on 6/6/07).
Hope this clears up my reasoning for the injection of cash now by the T&G placing.
Hope the first due payment date is not a bad Omen!
bosley
- 02 Jun 2006 14:23
- 17126 of 27111
garyble
- 02 Jun 2006 14:55
- 17127 of 27111
Cantlose,
I do see where you're coming from but:
From RNS of 06/06/05:
Of the total consideration, US$1.23 million has already been paid in cash to EKI
as a non-refundable deposit. A further US$11.27 million is due to be paid on
completion of the acquisition which will be satisfied in cash. A further
US$6.25 million in cash is due to be paid in 12 months and a final payment of
US$6.25 million in cash is due 12 months thereafter. The deferred elements are
not subject to performance criteria. Stanelco is currently considering a number
of options for funding the acquisition, which may include the entering into
arrangements for debt facilities and/or a placing of ordinary shares for cash.
I make the date of completion 05/09/05 or thereabouts and therefore the next installemnt would follow 12 months from that date.
garyble
- 02 Jun 2006 14:58
- 17128 of 27111
Bosley,
Placings 1 & 2 are mentioned in the annual report and equate to ~14.1m of which 7.1m was stated to have gone to the first installment of the Biotec acquisition. 3 machines also had to be purchased {not sure if new or used}. I also noticed that stock had increased considerably from the previous year so when you add it all up I don't think you'll be far off.
garyble
- 02 Jun 2006 15:10
- 17129 of 27111
EWR,
from tonyrelaxes's AGM feedback:
GREENSEAL and DELAYS
Apart from usual unexpected problems developing new concepts and technologies, delays came about from the extreme pressures on margins imposed by ASDA/Wal-Mart. The tray lidding machines are required to be operating at full speed for 16 or more hours a day, 7 days a week.
This pressure on margins is good for SEO as it makes suppliers really need and want its cost savings advantages (and A/W want them to adopt GS) but does not allow adequate down time to convert and satisfactorily commission machines.
To overcome this SEO have purchased each of the 3 types of machines in regular use (Pro seal. Multi Vac and Mondini) to lend suppliers so there is no downtime to production lines.
Not sure if SEO bought new or used, I'd go for new to be absolutely sure they stood a good chance of working properly. I would assume from this strategy that the SEO machine would displace the first to be converted, and once they had cascaded through all conversions, the last converted machine would then slot back into the first machine spot thus releasing SEO's unit for the next company.
Mad Pad
- 02 Jun 2006 19:17
- 17130 of 27111
Garbyle from my recollection of the AGM at least one of these machines they bought was used ,a price of +- 60 K springs to mind.I dont recall which one it was ,Tony might remember but I think it cropped in my one to one with HW.He also said Terry had real difficulty in getting hold of these machines as demand was so high.Hope this helps.Warm ,sunny 22deg in Cork.
pinnacle
- 02 Jun 2006 19:44
- 17131 of 27111
So how are we to interpret today's placing?
From the above it would seem that the money will be used for funding the Biotec acquisition - so no real news to get excited about!
Although a long term holder, I am still concerned and hope that whenever they intend to report - if someone knows please say- that the news is positive and not more jam tomorrow.
Someone previously mentioned the income from Starpol - presumably this can only be forthcoming subject to approval in the USA?
Any comments?
garyble
- 02 Jun 2006 21:19
- 17132 of 27111
Thanks Mad Pad, was trying to find out cost of new and used machines.
EWRobson
- 02 Jun 2006 22:41
- 17133 of 27111
Thanks, Garyble, that makes sense. We really need an idiot's guide for people like me. Re-reading the Chairman's statement which now makes more sense. He discusses the two steps they have taken to cope with the installing environment: a combination of temporary machinery and by having dedicated teams available to fine tune the R&D elements. The question remains as to when commercialisation is deemed to have been achieved. A Proseal machine is being given extended testing in the factory. The Multivac conversions are undergoing trials at a salad and a meat supplier. So what is meant 'by placing the first contracted machine'. This seems to imply that the Proseal and Multivac situations are still not contracts. I understand and accept your view that the first 'contracted machine' goes in to allow a rolling conversion of machines under the contract and is removed at the end of the process for another user. It is clearly a time-consuming process.
The positive thing is Lovegrove's confidence that they have the ability to make up the shortfall in the roll-out programme; also that ASDA (and WalMart) retain their confidence in Stanelco despite the difficulties in bringing the technology on line.
It does take some doing to get your head around the situation. I wish all posters would make the effort and we wouldn't have the negative and snide remarks. Greenseal remains an absolute winner in its own right although we will probably see the returns from Starpol and Wrap first.
Eric
Mad Pad
- 03 Jun 2006 10:32
- 17134 of 27111
Anyone know why Starpol 3000 hasnt recieved FDA approval yet?
Mad Pad
- 03 Jun 2006 11:25
- 17135 of 27111
Just picked this up from yesterdays FT"The cash is needed for working capital purposes ,according to traders."
Tonyrelaxes
- 03 Jun 2006 20:45
- 17136 of 27111
OBLO
(sorry everyone else, off topic)
I thought of you as I went to a great restaurant in Monetchikovsky, central Moscow last night.
I had to, it was named Oblomov !
Tony
oblomov
- 04 Jun 2006 08:56
- 17137 of 27111
I hope the food was of a higher quality than some of my posts, Tony, and that the waiters were a little more active than my other namesake!
barney12345
- 04 Jun 2006 18:55
- 17138 of 27111
Madpad
I asked PM1 this when Starpol 3000 was launched and his view and the general consensus here was that it was not needed. Who knows may be it is.
Mad Pad
- 04 Jun 2006 19:24
- 17139 of 27111
Barney,only asked the question because like a to company produce what it promises.(God alone knows why I'm involved with Stanelco then it must be greed or maybe I'm MAD or have a death wish.)I don't have the AGM docs to hand but I think it said "starpol 3000 FDA approval expected in a few weeks".That was over a month ago.Glorious hot and sunny in Cork.
oblomov
- 04 Jun 2006 22:08
- 17140 of 27111
Pad,
from AGM statement:-
As announced on 14 February 2006, Starpol 2000 now has the
relevant US FDA approval, along with its European equivalent. Starpol 3000 is
expected to be confirmed as fully compliant under the same regulation and we
expect approval in turn for this within weeks - as with another of our products
Starpol Wrap which is an ideal product to replace waxed paper for burger wrap
and other deli counter applications.
greekman
- 05 Jun 2006 08:14
- 17141 of 27111
There are often posts stating that if SEO don't pull their finger out, alternative manufacturers/products will be a threat. Although the following is about a different natural substance to that being used by SEO, it gives a good insight into the future of such innovations. The most important paragraph to me is the last one in the full article which I am sure applies to many similar innovative ideas. For full article see link.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200606051759/11492106
New use sought for waste potato starch
Posted at 6:01pm on 5 Jun 2006
Scientists are working on refining waste starch from potato chip manufacturing for further use in the expanded polystyrene market.
Plastic could be made from barley?
Conventional on-farm plastics could be usurped by a film made from barley, if research being conducted by the Biopolymer Network is successful.
And the following is why SEO are in front and have an advantage ( perhaps not for too long though )
BUT Dr Larsen says it's not a simple process and a workable product is still about THREE years away.
My comments....And then of course comes the process of testing, sales etc.
So there are two main points here .....1 SEO need to move forward re contracts in the next 2 to 3 years. 2 They need to keep the new products in advancement of their competitors.
In my opinion they will do both, at least for several years.