Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


driver - 10 Jun 2006 10:23 - 17197 of 27111

olivier
Yes it's true I spotted them on the No 9 bus going down Oxford St.

oblomov - 10 Jun 2006 11:05 - 17198 of 27111


I can confirm that - there they go. Unfortunately, the bus was heading the wrong way up the bus lane, they arrived late and missed the meeting!


cynic - 10 Jun 2006 16:27 - 17199 of 27111

Greekman .....nothingcould go wrong except Dow falling 50 points in the last 15 minutes of trades .... Let's hope F/E and London does not catch fright at that on Monday morning, albeit that that took Dow significantly back below the support/resistance level of 109640

soul traders - 10 Jun 2006 19:41 - 17200 of 27111

Evening all - a quick thought on the subject of competition, e.g. from the likes of BASF as discussed a few posts back.

I would assume that the market is large enough to support a number of players and that even the first/the best would not corner more than a sizeable chunk thereof. There is also the issue of speed of roll-out internationally, gearing-up of manufacture, etc. all of which takes time and allows competitors to play.

IMO this pizza's big enough for everyone to have a bite.

hewittalan6 - 11 Jun 2006 19:56 - 17201 of 27111

Forgive me if I am a bit reluctant on my sources, but all he will allow me to say is that he is a senior buyer within an Asda department, who are particularly affected by the Starpol and Greenseal trials.
In discussion with him over the weekend he told me several key things.
1) Walmart looking over the trials and new packaging is absolute company policy. They would do that regardless of any interest in the product. It is as much about ensuring Asda are aware of big brother as much as anything. It is WM policy to be very overt on checking up on subsidiaries and suppliers.
2) They will only buy into the SEO products if there is a demonstrable cost saving to be made. They wish to appear as good neighbours but that is ultimately second to profit.
3) Asda, and WM have a concern over the "greeness" of Starpol. While they accept that the product itself is environmentally friendly, the production of it is not. Particularly they have calculated that the raw starch material travels an astonishing 19000 air miles on its way to becoming Starpol. They are worried that if they try to capitalise on a green image, this will become public and the environmentalists will make them look a bit stupid!!
4) Apparantly, SEO are unable to promise that the starch used in Starpol is GM free. Asda and WM feel this would also tarnish the environmental badge.
My friend would not be drawn on the success or otherwise of the trials, and would only smile knowingly when I broached the Wrap subject.
In summary, he feels that Asda, and WM will buy Starpol in huge quantities, but only if those last 3 question marks can be addressed.
I apologise for not bringing this to the boards attention sooner, but I have only known this man for 5 months and until Saturday, I had no idea what he did for a living!!
My confidence is knocked somewhat, but I am staying in and seeing it out.
As usual, DYOR etc. but this source is very reliable. Remember he heads up a world wide sourcing and buying team for ASDA, with a budget measured in 9 figures, on a product range that is very closely associated with Starpol / Greenseal.
Alan

cynic - 11 Jun 2006 20:31 - 17202 of 27111

Sorry hewitt, but the above reads like the biggest load of hogwash i have ever seen in my very long life.

ptholden - 11 Jun 2006 20:40 - 17203 of 27111

Perhaps you would like to elucidate Cynic, rather than your usual inane comment?
By the way, how exactly do you choose which stocks to invest in, considering that by your own admission you know nothing about either Technical Analysis or Fundamentals?

EWRobson - 11 Jun 2006 21:29 - 17204 of 27111

Interested in your post Alan. Interested in comments. Given that Starpol is at an early production stage, the mileage and GM issues don't sound significant. If you want that product and set up a micro plant then materials would be sourced closer to home and you would ensure that they were GM free. The comment sounds more like knocking copy than serious evaluation.

Eric

driver - 11 Jun 2006 21:34 - 17205 of 27111

Al
Friends in such high places.

cynic - 11 Jun 2006 21:38 - 17206 of 27111

i choose stocks by giving the dog a pencil, blindfolding him and then sticking the share page in front of him .... he is surprisingly successful at picking winners.

ptholden - 11 Jun 2006 21:49 - 17207 of 27111

Why blindfold the dog? You could blindfold yourself :-))

cynic - 11 Jun 2006 21:54 - 17208 of 27111

tried that, but found the dog's a much better pundit .... clearly has some sort of 6th sense, whereas i have none

hewittalan6 - 11 Jun 2006 22:25 - 17209 of 27111

Fine.
I report, verbatim, a discussion between myself and a friend whom happens to work in a high profile role for Asda, and I get abused by an arse.
I shall very happily keep any further news to myself.
Those who have read these boards for any length of time will know that I have no axe to grind, and am a long term supporter of SEO.
Imbeciles will come up with ridiculous comments.
Eric, my friend was discussing the issues of sourcing cheap enough starch. This is coming from third world countries, to keep raw material costs low, and being transported to first world countries for production. This is where the high mileage comes in, not in transporting the finished product.
The GM issue is also covered by this as many GM trials are carried out in asian nations as their regulations are less rigorous.
Anyway. To the muppet. Take it or leave it. I really don't care.
To the rest of you, I will happily post news I may get hold of in the future.
Alan

chocolat - 11 Jun 2006 22:26 - 17210 of 27111

You can borrow my cat any time Alan ;)

ptholden - 11 Jun 2006 22:40 - 17211 of 27111

Alan
I wouldn't worry too much about Cynic, likes to post on lots of threads in an attempt to come across as someone who knows what he is talking about. However, it is painfully obvious that he does not, reminds me of a poster called Mufmitz on another board, perhaps they are related?
Err, and I've got three cats and you can have 'em all if you want and I'll throw in the dog as well.
pth

rmhyams - 12 Jun 2006 01:26 - 17212 of 27111

With regard to Alan's post number 17201, as we all should know Starpol is made by mixing PLA with TPS. PLA is made from corn starch, and is manufactured by Natureworks with whom Stanelco has got a supply agreement. Wal-Mart are using Natureworks' PLA. Stanelco have said that Starpol will be cheaper than the oil based plastic equivalent.
Therefore, according to Alan's friend, as the 3 question marks have been addressed as outlined above, Asda and Wal-Mart will be buying Starpol in huge quantities.
I look forward to the great news.

bhunt1910 - 12 Jun 2006 07:10 - 17213 of 27111

I remain cautiously optimistic ??

greekman - 12 Jun 2006 07:34 - 17214 of 27111

As to hewittalan6's post re the discussion with Asda employee. He readily states he can not substantiate the fact stated, so we can only go on belief or not.
The comments come over as sensible so to me I am taking it as genuine. Each to his own. The main point made is the travel distance of the corn starch. OK but as I see it not as big an environmental question as bringing oil thousands of miles. If this really does kick off, I can see the product being fully produced in a far nearer country to the corn producers than here. This will save on cost as although there will still be transport cost etc, the labor source cost will obviously be cheaper. Helping poorer countries with jobs goes down well in this modern society. As to Walmart wanting a thorough look at Starpol prior to spending millions of dollars, it makes sense even after the Asda trials although they obviously wont start from zero.

tweenie - 12 Jun 2006 07:50 - 17215 of 27111

Thanks for your post ALAN.
Made interesting reading.
Frankly , having read it asnd mulled it over, I don't see anything that can't be overcome /addressed in the very short term by processes/expectations already implied such as local sources for starch and MMP's.
If as is suggested COST is the overriding factor and STARPOL/GREENSEAL is cheaper than plastic etc (Production wise) then its a winner and should be taken up in due course. A little GREEN is better than corporate grey.#
That jam tommorrow sure looks good. lol

hewittalan6 - 12 Jun 2006 07:54 - 17216 of 27111

At last. Sensible responses.
The conversation made perfect sense to me.
If I was chairman at WM I would hardly change an entire supply and spend millions advertising my green credentials only for some jumped up little tree hugging bog dweller to pop up on a tv show and wreck it with comments about exploitation, aero fuel and genetic modification. I would want to be certain my green case was watertight. Wouldn't you???
Register now or login to post to this thread.