Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


Jumpin - 14 Oct 2004 21:54 - 172 of 27111

If he can't keep the faith why should the shareholders? andysmith, if you know enough to keep in.. does he know enough to sell?

apple - 14 Oct 2004 22:36 - 173 of 27111

Why bother with SEO

Better prospects elsewhere.

andysmith - 15 Oct 2004 08:45 - 174 of 27111

I think he took his options before he has to resign or is pushed once full details of the court case are apparent and his poor management of this issue is exposed. Behind this, SEO has an excellent product and the future should be OK.
If you could make >500k in less than an hour you would, especially if you might not be able to in a few months?

bosley - 15 Oct 2004 08:50 - 175 of 27111

apple, that was cold. ouch!!!

bosley - 22 Oct 2004 15:03 - 176 of 27111

not to bad so far today , up 9% and buys outnumbering sells by almost 4 to 1..

hlyeo98 - 24 Oct 2004 14:14 - 177 of 27111

Looks like SEO will recover soon.

bosley - 26 Oct 2004 12:39 - 178 of 27111

something going on. bprg dropping like a lead balloon. seo creeping up. anybody got any ideas why?

bosley - 26 Oct 2004 12:42 - 179 of 27111

two big buys just gone through 2x 1 250 000

tipton11 - 26 Oct 2004 14:52 - 180 of 27111

surely 250k is hardly a big buy

AdieH - 26 Oct 2004 15:09 - 181 of 27111

BPRG recovering, large buys going through...

andysmith - 26 Oct 2004 22:26 - 182 of 27111

I know some BPRG holders read and write on this and I seriously hope you all end up OK with current slide. The SEO Packaging concept works, they just need the struggling meat packers to stump up the cash to get it rolling and save everyone's bacon!! Come on SEO, or deep brown stuff will come if appeal happens and fails. Still hanging in here with Bosley.

emailpat - 27 Oct 2004 00:37 - 183 of 27111

good luck guys-best result... if bprg takes seo over...what a combo!!

bosley - 28 Oct 2004 09:27 - 184 of 27111

tipton, you missed the 1 (million) infront of the 250k

mancharry1 - 30 Oct 2004 20:40 - 185 of 27111

im in with you bosley! will discuss next time at fratelli, peter

bosley - 01 Nov 2004 12:26 - 186 of 27111

hiya peter. got your leaflet.nice! so you finally took the plunge, eh? good on you.

bosley - 01 Nov 2004 12:28 - 187 of 27111

tomorrow sees more on the court case. a judgement is expected on the compensation claim and also if seo have any grounds for appeal. i would imagine there will be a drop in price .hopefully this will be the end of it. if seo are true to form i would also imagine some good news within a short period of time. good luck .... and dont panic.

AdieH - 01 Nov 2004 15:04 - 188 of 27111

Lets hope so, then they can both move forward...

tipton11 - 01 Nov 2004 18:04 - 189 of 27111

bosley...many apologies off to spec savers in the morning

bosley - 02 Nov 2004 09:02 - 190 of 27111

?@tipton

bosley - 04 Nov 2004 09:33 - 191 of 27111

oh dearie me....# when will this thing be over cos its getting right on me tits this is.

rns 1
BioProgress plc

('BioProgress' or 'the Company')

Further success for BioProgress in patent entitlement case


BioProgress plc (AIM: BPRG; NASDAQ: BPRG) announces that in a hearing yesterday
in the dispute between BioProgress Technology Limited and Stanelco Fibre Optics
Limited ('Stanelco'), the UK Patents Court made further rulings following the
previous judgment handed down on 1 October 2004.


The Court made various declarations about which company had invented the process
of sealing water-soluble polymeric materials by radio frequency ('RF') welding
in order to form capsules. These declarations made reference to BioProgress'
sole entitlement to the main claim and all except three subsidiary claims in the
Master Patent. The Court also clarified that BioProgress' entitlement to the
main patent claims in the Master Patent conferred no right upon Stanelco to use
any of the subsidiary processes without the permission of BioProgress.


In its earlier judgment, the Court had held that Stanelco had misused
Bioprogress' confidential information by making the patent filings which founded
the three families of patents. Yesterday, the Court made an Order for the
commencement of the procedure for assessing the amount to be paid in damages by
Stanelco to BioProgress for breach of confidence.


Stanelco was ordered to disclose details of its foreign patent applications, so
that ownership of all patents and patent applications in the Master Patent
family can be dealt with at a further, final hearing in approximately 4-6 weeks
time.


The Court also made an order for costs in favour of BioProgress. Stanelco must
make an interim payment towards these costs of approximately 180,000 within two
weeks.


At the end of the hearing, Stanelco indicated that it had commenced an
application to request the Court to reconsider certain aspects of the previous
judgment. Stanelco was ordered to file its evidence within seven days.


Graham Hind, Chief Executive of BioProgress said: 'We are very pleased that the
Court has confirmed our entitlement to the main patent claims in the Master
Patent and has awarded us interim costs. The Court has made clear directives to
Stanelco as to the course of action it must now take. We remain as comfortable
as we have always been with our position, and will be making no further comment
until the next hearing is concluded.'


- Ends -


doesnt look good for seo.

rns 2

Stanelco plc

Clarification of Patent Entitlement Case

Stanelco finds it necessary to clarify certain information contained within one
of BioProgress' press releases in connection with the litigation between the two
companies.


Stanelco wishes to clarify that the Court has not ordered that Stanelco has to
pay damages to BioProgress. No final Order will be made until Stanelco's
application to admit further evidence, which may result in a reconsideration of
certain of the Judge's findings, has been determined. All the Court has
determined to date are the principles of a mechanism through which any damages
will be assessed, if a final Order for damages is ultimately made.


It is Stanelco's firm position that no damages, or at worst, minimal damages,
will ultimately be found to be payable to BioProgress.

semantics i think. on bprg thread is a write up from someone who was at the court. doesnt look good for seo .

rns 3

CORRECTION Stanelco says has not yet been ordered to pay BioProgress damages
AFX


(Correcting this item from yesterday to show BioProgress never claimed that Stanelco had been ordered to pay damages, but rather at this point only costs)

LONDON (AFX) - Stanelco PLC said the UK Patents Court has not ordered it to pay damages to BioProgress PLC in a dispute over patent applications.

BioProgress earlier said that the court had made an order for Stanelco to pay costs to it, and must make an interim payment towards these costs of about 180,000 stg within two weeks.

However, Stanelco said later that the court will not make a final order until the company's application to admit further evidence, which may result in a reconsideration of some of the judge's findings, has been determined.

The company added that it believes that no damages, or at worst minimal damages, will ultimately be found to be payable to Bioprogress.

ends

will be good when it is over and done with, i think . both companies need to move on . at best it would be good if seo would explain why they feel the need to fight this so much , ( and so badly by some accounts), when there are other and potentialy more profitable parts to seo.



Register now or login to post to this thread.