for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Re CC case I understand the relevant SEO patents have to be handed over to BPRG by March 18th. The full claim by BPRG will be on the Courts Web site as soon as it is received, which surely must be any time soon so that we can all put this to bed. (So eager beavers do keep looking!) Meanwhile SEO issue another wad of Share Options...why did they not announce this a few days ago..they and the MM's must have known it was going to happen...who are their advisors, must check...jgt

Stanelco Plc

Additional Listing

Today announces the issue of 271,080 ordinary shares of 0.1p each representing
0.03% of the issued capital.

These shares have been issued to a retired employee under the Enterprise
Management Incentives Share option scheme at an exercise price of 2.87p.



This is peanuts compared to the cap of the company.

Amities/ Bonsoir mes amies - Volume again down quite considerably..Dissappointingly less than 4m stock traded with a pretty fair ratio of buys to sells .Even more of a dissappointment was the absence of early bird buyers who recently have always provided the stimuli to the days trading , and "kerb buyers " whose trading kept interest mustard hot awaiting market inception . . And if truth be known the mms had no need to exercise a policy of shinnigans with the spread to wrestle the stock from peoples greasy palms today .As far as i can make out from inquiries there is ONLY one mm running the book reg. SEO . Thats tantamount to utter manipulation in itself.But thus far they have been more thn fair. A lot of sells were domino like and systematic :and based on pure fear alone . Hence surrendered . Good support illustrated at the 14.25/ 14.5 level.And buyers returned with a vegeance. But with so much at stake i am quite shocked as to peoples motivations in selling at such a derisory s/p ( Perhaps a plethora of " T " trades were due for settlement today ) .We all know those prelims only need merely belie/ suggest/ hint/ imply/ signify a deal might be on the cards and we have 25p overnight. Confirmation and verification of a deal ?? Wow , the mind boggles. At such a time an announcement may be almost too good to be true- even considered hasty by city standards -but nothing would surprise me reg. SEO. .On a more positive note i am of the opinion { as is Eric ) that the vast majority of those who are getting out are in effect already out !! ,,lf not confidence restored certinly a case of confidence revisited .. ,, ,,,,a'bientot ...sante ciao ,,,@+ J .

Amities/ Bonsoir mes amies - Volume again down quite considerably..Dissappointingly less than 4m stock traded with a pretty fair ratio of buys to sells .Even more of a dissappointment was the absence of early bird buyers who recently have always provided the stimuli to the days trading , and "kerb buyers " whose trading kept interest mustard hot awaiting market inception . . And if truth be known the mms had no need to exercise a policy of shinnigans with the spread to wrestle the stock from peoples greasy palms today .As far as i can make out from inquiries there is ONLY one mm running the book reg. SEO . Thats tantamount to utter manipulation in itself.But thus far they have been more thn fair. A lot of sells were domino like and systematic :and based on pure fear alone . Hence surrendered . Good support illustrated at the 14.25/ 14.5 level.And buyers returned with a vegeance. But with so much at stake i am quite shocked as to peoples motivations in selling at such a derisory s/p ( Perhaps a plethora of " T " trades were due for settlement today ) .We all know those prelims only need merely belie/ suggest/ hint/ imply/ signify a deal might be on the cards and we have 25p overnight. Confirmation and verification of a deal ?? Wow , the mind boggles. At such a time an announcement may be almost too good to be true- even considered hasty by city standards -but nothing would surprise me reg. SEO. .On a more positive note i am of the opinion { as is Eric ) that the vast majority of those who are getting out are in effect already out !! ,,lf not confidence restored certinly a case of confidence revisited .. ,, ,,,,a'bientot ...sante ciao ,,,@+ J .

Amities/ Bonsoir mes amies - Volume again down quite considerably..Dissappointingly less than 4m stock traded with a pretty fair ratio of buys to sells .Even more of a dissappointment was the absence of early bird buyers who recently have always provided the stimuli to the days trading , and "kerb buyers " whose trading kept interest mustard hot awaiting market inception . . And if truth be known the mms had no need to exercise a policy of shinnigans with the spread to wrestle the stock from peoples greasy palms today .As far as i can make out from inquiries there is ONLY one mm running the book reg. SEO . Thats tantamount to utter manipulation in itself.But thus far they have been more thn fair. A lot of sells were domino like and systematic :and based on pure fear alone . Hence surrendered . Good support illustrated at the 14.25/ 14.5 level.And buyers returned with a vegeance. But with so much at stake i am quite shocked as to peoples motivations in selling at such a derisory s/p ( Perhaps a plethora of " T " trades were due for settlement today ) .We all know those prelims only need merely belie/ suggest/ hint/ imply/ signify a deal might be on the cards and we have 25p overnight. Confirmation and verification of a deal ?? Wow , the mind boggles. At such a time an announcement may be almost too good to be true- even considered hasty by city standards -but nothing would surprise me reg. SEO. .On a more positive note i am of the opinion { as is Eric ) that the vast majority of those who are getting out are in effect already out !! ,,lf not confidence restored certinly a case of confidence revisited .. ,, ,,,,a'bientot ...sante ciao ,,,@+ J .

Amities/ ...Apologies. Quite uncertain as to why, or how, that contribution appears three times . ..l mean i dont mind making a fool of myself once; but three times ?? ..hmm ....@+ J

Do it again and i report you for spamming, LOL

Off topic Jamie , I still hold FDI,GFM and JKX, also is NOP still worth holding, and do you hold CSH?

evening. oh well. red day. never mind. like most of us still here, sitting on a fat profit margin. no intention of selling. dont see the point. infact, all red for me too.

Lets not get carried away people! I remember the same sort of sentiment with Chelford Group a while ago, then the price dropped alamingly and stayed low for ages. I t still hasnt recovered after a year

got back in on monday and unfortunately seeing red, however, i still think this has some way to go medium term.

all my others are red apart from OXB which is a nice shade of blue.

keith thomas

Can't see the point of your post, friend. What have SEO and Chelford Group got in common? Oh, its the fact that sentiment is similar! Get real, I suggest and compare the fundamentals, then give a well-considered post, please.

Eric

keith thomas
I don't know what your quibbling about if you had bought Chelford at the beginning of 2005 at 140 and sold today you would have made 1 a share (not bad) they are now 240, its called timing if you get it wrong its hard luck.

Looks like a triangle pattern forming. I wonder which way it will break?

dclinton, please could you explain what you mean by "a triangle pattern forming"? i like to learn new things, thats all.
keith thomas, seo and chr are worlds apart. chr , good company thats moving slowly but nicely upwards(i hold from many years ago . i dont expect to see my stake for a few years yet!!!). seo, on the verge of a seriously profitable journey. as driver says, get your timing right and you are smiling , get it wrong and ..........

keith thomas
Sorry I may of been a bit harsh but I am the one who sold Next for 300p, my Rage software, ennigis, Redstone/T, all went down the pan so we have all been there.
Off to work have a good day..

morning all.plenty snow outside. looks lovely.

drizzle is surrey - grey & horrid

bosley - it's a bit of technical analysis and a very common chart pattern.

Look at the daily chart over the past week and what you see are a series of higher lows and lower highs. Draw lines along the peaks and troughs and you will see that they converge, forming a triangle shape.

What this indicates is that the buyers and sellers are gradually coming into balance. However, the theory is that this balance can't be maintained and at some point the price will break out of the triangle. When that happens it frequently moves sharply in the direction of the breakout.

However, sometimes you get a false breakout and the price then moves back the other direction. The main point is that whichever way the eventual move is, it is usually quite significant.

Of course, this is technical analysis and really only talks about probabilities, so there is no certainty about the outcome. I suggest reading the FT's "Investor's guide to charting" by Alistair Blair as a starting point. There are then any number of other books devoted to the subject.

Personally, I used to rely heavily on Technical Analysis (TA) but since I started investing based on fundamentals my portfolio has done a lot better. Not to say TA doesn't work, just that my mentality seems better suited to fundamental analysis.

doug

dclinton

thanks for the info re TA: i have always wondered about that graph.

BTW: can you recommend any material either internet based or papertype which outlines the differences in charts and how to read them?

Cheers

Moving up on thin volumes - just posted this really to keep it on the front page