for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Golden straws Mad Pad!!
kim

Oblo,

Having failed to receive your e-mail re: Leaks, I've PM'd you on FYB and included my hotmail address.

Would greatly appreciate your info.

Garyble.

Thanks for your message GD Potts!

A prefer to take a positive approach rather than a doomsday one - after all if you take a pessimistic view then don't invest!

By investing in companies you have to have a positive approach otherwise what is the point.

As I said people love bad news rather than good - very sad but it's a fact - is it good or bad that sells nespapers?

I am fully aware of the difficulties Stanelco have in dealing with large companies - I have the same in my business.

I don't think that people who have no experience in business fully understand the protracted nature of dealing with these corporations - patience will be rewarded.

If anyone is looking for a quick buck then investing in companies is not the way to do it - indeed anything worthwhile is usually worth the wait.

We can only hope Pinnacle.

Helpful post, pinnacle. The larger the company, the more protracted the negotiation. Essentially, with a relatively small company you can get to the decision maker or the key influencer. With the larger company the guy appears important and is in a relative sort of way but there can be so many hurdles to crack. What, for instance, is the level of autonomy in ASDA for decision making. How are decisions made in WalMart and where is the real power. OK, you may have the blessing as a key 'green' supplier but who holds the purse strings. It may be that the guy has the authority to initiate a trial but not spending real money.

The other side of teh coin is that ASDA were prepared to sanction the effort where, presumably, their competitors were not. Stanelco just have to move forward where they can. My point is that it is very difficult to prejudge the timescales. But once the ship starts moving forward in real terms, just think about the momentum!

Eric

Thanks for the posts Potts and Robson.

One thing that doesn't seem to get mentioned - but would solve all financial concerns is the sale of the cigarette filter!

This one product could change everything on it's own!

Your posts Robson are always informative and well thought out - keep it going!!

All of us want the same thing - let's hope we are rewarded.

Good Luck to all.

pinnacle

I have no news of the fag butts since the AGM. At that I made the following notes -

Rothschilds were working on a "no sale, no fee" basis which shows their faith in getting a worthwhile result for themselves.

It is a process with several stages -

Stage 1, Identify potential customers. Various parties had shown "significant interest".
Stage 2, Further development still had to be completed. Biotec are working with Adept Polymers in Warrington on necessary development and testing "still proving the Patents and materials".
Stage 3, comes after all this "but don't hold your breath".

Tony

A reminder of what has been said about the ciggy filters:-


Biodegradable cigarette filters developed in UK

A biodegradable cigarette filter has been developed that is said to be
better for smokers as well as the environment. The filters are made from
food-grade starch, the carbohydrate polymer in foods such as potatoes
and rice.
The British company that is developing them, Southampton-based Stanelco,
which already makes biodegradable packaging, says it is in talks with
cigarette manufacturers in Europe, North America and Asia about using
them to replace existing filters.

"There is no safe cigarette, but that doesn't mean that they should not
be cleaner and greener," says Howard White, Stanelco's president.
Stanelco says the butts will decompose in just two months, whereas
existing filters made of the synthetic polymer cellulose acetate never
biodegrade, creating 500,000 tonnes of pollution a year around the
world. The company also claims that the filters should be better for
smokers' health as any fragments that end up in the lung will degrade
more quickly, although it has not published any studies to support this.


"It doesn't alter the fact that the main product is still going to be as
deadly as ever" Amanda Sandford from ASH said. It also means that
cigarettes can't be thrown away just because the butts will decompose,
Ms Sandford when on to say "We need to change the mindset of smokers so
butts are disposed of properly."

New Scientist 7/10/05
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/earth/mg18825202.800 (full article
is available to subscribers)

kim

Kim, smoking is an anti green habit so can't imagine that smokers will give too hoots one way or the other about Stanelcos new filter. Tobacco companies may adopt the new filter if costs can be cut only. I can't imagine Gordon Brown will allow any tax relief for businesses using green filters so at the end of the day manufactures will continue to control the market which ultimatly is controlled by the smoker. Should these green filters affect the 'draw', taste, or start to decompose should any slightly wet tobacco be used in the rolling process consumers will steer well clear and ultimatly the filter won't sell...... Alot at risk and hardly the money spinner SEO has tried to create for release of the product!!

Explosive, I have always had a feeling that if SEO had an inclination that a biofilter could make money, they would have found a way to manufacture and sell it themselves rather than try to offload it. The whole idea could well go up in smoke!
kim

Kim hahahahaha!! LOL now theres a statement I'll happily second. Lets also remember that if you really want to go green you'd simply give up smoking which isn't good news for these filters however you look at it.

Now if SEO can develop an antil cancer filter, the tobacco companies would que up for them. I'm sure the yearly legal battles being driven to 0% is attraction enough.

Just thought I would mention the following.

Eastern Europe and China are very much into smoking - to such a degree that cigarettes are used in deal making, such are there perceived value.

I wish people didn't smoke, especially after losing members of my family to cancer, but as people will not give up the new filter will help to make the cigarette companies appear to be concerned and even caring - very dangerous but true.

Stanelco would find it difficult to develop themselves - a conflict with the food industry - so much better to accept either a payment for the idea/concept or receive royalties per pack etc.

Remember going green is not cheap a paper cup is 3p more than a plastic one and clients as well as customers won't pay.

People like the idea of green but don't want to pay for it.

On another point what if Stanelco was bought - anyone with any sensible thought on how much the company would be worth?

I suppose, putting the whole thing into perspective, the tobacco companies really don't give a damn but if they could be percieved as doing 'something' to help the world then they would look at biofilters as a way to salve their conscience. They don't fool us though, do they?!
kim

err, why would anyone want to buy SEO?
They are a loss making company and struggling to create revenue streams.
Harsh but true.

Perhaps a little too harsh there PT! They DO have some excellent stuff in their portfolio and they are close to making a success of things. There has been too much management optimism perhaps, or have they just been playing for time? Either way SEO have got to be on the verge of making a success of their technology and it is probably make or break time when they release the Interims: no really good news, shareholders will be dumping their holdings quicker than a smoker dumps his/her ash on the pavement, however a statement that GreenSeal is now a success story and Starpol is wanted by all the big names - well, I leave you to guess which way the sp will go!
kim

Loss making company, cheap sp, struggling to create revenue, patients plenty, and lots of potential, in discussion with some very big players..... Actully I think there are plenty of companies that may be intrested in a takeover or aquiring a good percentage of shares. It really all depends on immediate cash injection, its what all shareholders want and the rewards for such a player could well be very high. Lets not forget a partner in manufacturing and distribution could well speed up taking products to market and give SEO a needed cash injection for a % royalty in a product.

Finaly Pinnacle, cigarettes or cigars used in deal making. As you know cigars are smoked less a filter device!!

Kim, I sincerely hope that SEO are on the verge of making a breakthrough and yes they do have considerable potential. But at the moment potential does not create revenue, which is what they need, becuase if they don't get a move on they will be back to the Market for another top up in about 6-12 months time. There is a history of companies with breakthrough products that never quite got there, despite lots of hype and promise. I am not knocking SEO as such, but I am taking a pragmatic approach to their prospects based on the lack of success thus far. As is the way with many multi-bagger, over-hyped stocks SEO is now probably very much a long termer to reach the previous dizzy SP heights of 30p. It will take at least a year for the much vaunted 200 ASDA conversions to be completed, if indeed they ever are. Thankfully they have other products to create the required revenue.

Explosive, so why arn't these 'interested' companies snapping up SEO stock at the bargain price of 8p?

Possibly because the company is not worth 8p per share?

Believe me I will be a very happy bunny if the SP rockets, but there seems to be a lot of grasping of straws within this thread. Just about every possible avenue of using SEO's products / patents was explored during the reign of Paul Masterton and now it seems we are going around the whole thing again. Good grief!

Anyway, good luck.

pth

Yep, tight grip of assets required from now until Interims!
kim

ptholden - Or maybe there as keen as we are to see more than one Greenseal machine installed contract signed for goods or services. After all if such a company was to be looking at SEO for a % royalty there going to need to know how much capital investment is required in the first instance.

SEO have already signed a contract with an American engineering firm for greenseal rollout if I remember correctly. Not sure if the contract is still valid now though with all the delays.....