bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Mad Pad
- 04 Jul 2006 09:10
- 17542 of 27111
No trades showing yet?
bosley
- 04 Jul 2006 09:15
- 17543 of 27111
oblomov,
"If it doesn't happen very quickly (i.e. firm contracts and good future income stream projections) this company will sink like a stone."
isn't going from 30p to 8p a bit like sinking?
as for whether seo are a leaky company, take a look at the chart. before every spike , (good news), there is a significant dip in the sp and increase in volume. surely this can only be manipulation. people knew something was coming.
oblomov
- 04 Jul 2006 10:20
- 17544 of 27111
Agree re 'leakyness' Bos - and this is indicative of an unprofessional managment team, IMO, particularly when they choose to ignore evidence of a leak presented to them by an investor and to ignore that investors emails.
If they take a blase attitude to leaks what else are they taking a blase attitude to?
RE sinking like a stone - I wasn't referring to the SP - I was referring to the companies solvency.
EWRobson
- 04 Jul 2006 15:36
- 17545 of 27111
oblo: I was not intending to give the impression that I had changed to a long term view but I was trying to respond to a very natural short-termism by some on this thread. Two months is really very short-term and it is only two months since we had a pretty comprehensive coverage of their current negotiations. Given the size of the companies that they are dealing with and the potentially complex negotiations then we should not be alarmed if we still do not have firm contracts in place. Yes, there should be visible progress, but this does not mean that we will be in a position to lay down firm revenue forecasts.
Eric
markusantonius
- 04 Jul 2006 15:40
- 17546 of 27111
Just curious as to why the sp has suddenly become so PRECISE - 0.03... 0.06 and so forth recently - any thoughts on this?
Mad Pad
- 04 Jul 2006 15:52
- 17547 of 27111
Also now being quoted on cityline in 64ths for some reason.
garyble
- 04 Jul 2006 16:25
- 17548 of 27111
Thanks Oblo,
Message received and reply sent.
I realised why I had failed to recieve the previous mail, it was simply due to my incompetence, I had mis-typed my address.
greekman
- 04 Jul 2006 16:51
- 17549 of 27111
Markusantonius,
Re precise sp. See my post 17431.
churchill2
- 04 Jul 2006 19:37
- 17550 of 27111
I do not know what the outcome is for Stanelco and I fervently hope the end result is favourable. All I can say this Thread has more entertainment value than Coronation Street. More suspense than Agatha Christie and more technical terms than Star Wars.
kimoldfield
- 04 Jul 2006 23:53
- 17551 of 27111
Good to know that you can feel The Force Churchill2!
kim
tweenie
- 05 Jul 2006 12:41
- 17552 of 27111
I guess a few stop losses got hit at 8p.
is everyone still holding or are some brave enough to top up?
I would but the wife and kids insist on food and clothing.
ssanebs
- 05 Jul 2006 12:56
- 17553 of 27111
i have been told that the greenseal machine has successfully run for 16 hours and completed tests
oblomov
- 05 Jul 2006 13:29
- 17554 of 27111
Thats interesting, ssanebs.
Can you tell us where you heard it?
Oilywag
- 05 Jul 2006 13:34
- 17555 of 27111
ssanebs
16 hours just once or has it done 16 hours consecutively for a week or longer?
I wouldn't order a greenseal machine if it had run for 16 hours just once.
The oily one
bhunt1910
- 05 Jul 2006 14:28
- 17556 of 27111
I believe it was Thomas Edison who developed a practical light bulb toward the end of 1879 and who had over 400 attempts at getting it working - now look at where it is. Perhaps Greanseal is following in edisons footsteps - only another 380 attempts to go !!!!!!!
Biscuit
- 05 Jul 2006 14:35
- 17557 of 27111
Hi Ssanebs, is that in a factory or at their HQ in Southampton?
aldwickk
- 05 Jul 2006 15:10
- 17558 of 27111
oblomov - 04 Jul 2006 08:58 - 17541 of 17557
I agree with you 100%, there is something not right in the house of Stanelco.
garyble
- 05 Jul 2006 15:39
- 17559 of 27111
~640K shares sold is hardly a rush for the door, but the rash of AT trades seems interesting!
ssanebs
- 05 Jul 2006 15:58
- 17560 of 27111
dont know how many times but 16 hours was the period it had to pass
oblomov
- 05 Jul 2006 16:06
- 17561 of 27111
Still most interesting, but can you answer my question please, ssanebs. Where did you here this?