Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


BKK2 - 06 Jul 2006 08:21 - 17582 of 27111

Very Harsh oblomov, ssanbs postings have always been very accurate.

Peter

Sharesure - 06 Jul 2006 09:36 - 17583 of 27111

Have been in touch with the company twice recently; I may be drawing the wrong inference but came off the phone thinking that the delay in the next RNS on progress might this time genuinely be linked to them trying to conclude a deal. Has anyone else spoken to them and formed a similar view? It sure needs a coup like that, otherwise we're heading for even thinner times!

kimoldfield - 06 Jul 2006 10:31 - 17584 of 27111

Sharesure, it is wholly possible that the delay is so that an announcement can be made of the adoption of GreenSeal, Starpol 2000 & 3000 and Wrap products, with the approval of 3000 by the FDA & Europe. A long shot I know, but with Wal Mart's request for these to be fast tracked I can see it happening. The meat area at WM was identified as the first area to trial the products, GreenSeal was being trialled at Grampian Foods and it would therefore be logical to assume that the other products would be tested there with veg and salad stuff tested at Hitchin. Hitchin are now owned by Geest who will have a huge demand for packaging equipment and materials so there is another possibilty of future contracts there. Only guesswork though I'm afraid.
kim

oblomov - 06 Jul 2006 10:39 - 17585 of 27111


Peter,

I dont consider it harsh given the history of unsubstantiated crap on the BB's.

I asked a simple question, as did others. A genuine poster would have answered.

tweenie - 06 Jul 2006 10:41 - 17586 of 27111

well bit the bullet and topped up.
I believe the results will push sp up, will continue to hold long term, but have brought these extra shares as a short term profit gamble.
god, I hope I'm right....for once

BKK2 - 06 Jul 2006 11:43 - 17587 of 27111

Oblomov

Only thing I can say to that is ,yes unsubstantiated crab certainly does find its way on to the board, but the amount of time you and I have both spent following thing, I FEEL I know who the genuine posters are and I would have put both you and ssanbs in that group,so I still feel you were over the top this morning

Peter

garyble - 06 Jul 2006 12:15 - 17588 of 27111

Having noticed a spate of "AT" trades yesterday, helping the sp to dip, and today only one "AT" the remainder being "O" trades. I wonder if anyone can enlighten me as to how a trade falls into being an "AT" or "O".

I do know that SEO is a SETS/MM stock, and "AT" trades are automatic SETS trades whereas "O" trades are MM controlled.

What I would like to understand is the underlying mechanism...just out of curiosity.

Sharesure - 06 Jul 2006 12:33 - 17589 of 27111

Kimoldfield, thanks for your comment; hope that some/all of it is behind the delay.

ssanebs - 06 Jul 2006 12:44 - 17590 of 27111

check out my history on previous info, if i need to tell where my info came from i will not post again

automatic - 06 Jul 2006 14:43 - 17591 of 27111

ssanebs
keep posting please

driver - 06 Jul 2006 14:54 - 17592 of 27111

Re The machines have been running non-stop for the last 8 weeks

So has my washing and dishwasher does that count, bring back Alan.

G D Potts - 06 Jul 2006 15:41 - 17593 of 27111

Ssanebs adds probably the one thing worth reading on this thread driver, so try not to embarrass yourself talking about his info being impotent.
No one cares about youre washing machine or your posts.

driver - 06 Jul 2006 15:50 - 17594 of 27111

G D Potts

No but they care about my Research Page there's more stuff on there than all the post put together LOL

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread

driver - 06 Jul 2006 15:53 - 17595 of 27111

P.S
Ssanebs info IS impotent I do his washing.

G D Potts - 06 Jul 2006 15:54 - 17596 of 27111

bit of Copy and Past going on there.

driver - 06 Jul 2006 16:03 - 17597 of 27111

G D Potts
May be but it's still there no predictions no yer buts or no buts just facts anyway your only backing Ssanebs because you like what he says others attack andy for what he says.
This is what I say SEO is a pig of a share and will be till it gets its finger out, most on this board are down including me so get real.

automatic - 06 Jul 2006 17:23 - 17598 of 27111

oh dear a lot of people lost money on this one, thats no reason to get bitchy with each other, no one forced anyone to hold from the highs to the lows, some slagging off SEO now couldn't say eneough good things about it a little while back, remember how everyone was talking about the 50p party, every share is a pig when your loseing money on it, pays your money takes your chance

driver - 06 Jul 2006 17:31 - 17599 of 27111

automatic
I never said we wasn't going to have a 1 party in Donny we can still have it with pork for dinner.

angusrjy - 06 Jul 2006 17:33 - 17600 of 27111

Well I'm gonna have an 8p party when the results come out then I'm off shopping at oxfam with what money I've got left :-(

greekman - 06 Jul 2006 17:43 - 17601 of 27111

I agree that Ssanebs posts have always been interesting and been fairly accurate. Saying that, (and without trying to provoke a dispute) I feel Oblomov is fully justified in asking for some credibility of the post. It maybe that the info is from a delicate source that precludes Ssanebs from giving fuller details. I have no problem if that is the case, so if it is could you expand to that end. I once received info that I could not expand on, so I stated as such. Some posts stated, they could/would not treat the info with any credence, whilst others took it as fact. Either way did not bother me as without back up info I would not expect the majority of posters to take is as factual truth.
Register now or login to post to this thread.