bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
ssanebs
- 06 Jul 2006 12:44
- 17590 of 27111
check out my history on previous info, if i need to tell where my info came from i will not post again
automatic
- 06 Jul 2006 14:43
- 17591 of 27111
ssanebs
keep posting please
G D Potts
- 06 Jul 2006 15:41
- 17593 of 27111
Ssanebs adds probably the one thing worth reading on this thread driver, so try not to embarrass yourself talking about his info being impotent.
No one cares about youre washing machine or your posts.
driver
- 06 Jul 2006 15:50
- 17594 of 27111
G D Potts
No but they care about my Research Page there's more stuff on there than all the post put together LOL
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
G D Potts
- 06 Jul 2006 15:54
- 17596 of 27111
bit of Copy and Past going on there.
automatic
- 06 Jul 2006 17:23
- 17598 of 27111
oh dear a lot of people lost money on this one, thats no reason to get bitchy with each other, no one forced anyone to hold from the highs to the lows, some slagging off SEO now couldn't say eneough good things about it a little while back, remember how everyone was talking about the 50p party, every share is a pig when your loseing money on it, pays your money takes your chance
angusrjy
- 06 Jul 2006 17:33
- 17600 of 27111
Well I'm gonna have an 8p party when the results come out then I'm off shopping at oxfam with what money I've got left :-(
greekman
- 06 Jul 2006 17:43
- 17601 of 27111
I agree that Ssanebs posts have always been interesting and been fairly accurate. Saying that, (and without trying to provoke a dispute) I feel Oblomov is fully justified in asking for some credibility of the post. It maybe that the info is from a delicate source that precludes Ssanebs from giving fuller details. I have no problem if that is the case, so if it is could you expand to that end. I once received info that I could not expand on, so I stated as such. Some posts stated, they could/would not treat the info with any credence, whilst others took it as fact. Either way did not bother me as without back up info I would not expect the majority of posters to take is as factual truth.
pinnacle
- 06 Jul 2006 19:13
- 17602 of 27111
Just thought I would let you know tweenie that I also bought more to average out and hopefully make a few quid.
The purchase was large, and yet was not shown on the trades section - rang the broker who told me they can keep any large purchase for up to a month before putting it through - interesting!!
I honestly believe that if the news was to be bad then they would have had to report on time - the delay must be for something positive otherwise they are putting themselves in serious trouble.
Also I see that Teather on the 28th June put Stanelco as a buy!!
Why would they do this if the news was not going to be good?
It would damage their reputation as well as Stanelco.
Another point: Asda and others do not keep potential suppliers for this long without believing that they can supply - it just takes time.
Finally, I am surprised that no-one has mentioned this.
The new web-site clearly states Asda by name and the number of machines to be placed.
This cannot have been done without their permission - so why give it if the detail is not accurate?
Just some thoughts for you all to pull apart - but consider if they get it right!!!!
G D Potts
- 06 Jul 2006 19:15
- 17603 of 27111
Driver your 'get real' comment bambozles me, I am not defending SEO, in fact you could almost say I hate them.
G D Potts
- 06 Jul 2006 19:22
- 17604 of 27111
when is all this big news scheduled? when you expect to hear updates on greenseal and the wraps etc. Thanks.
G D Potts
- 06 Jul 2006 19:23
- 17605 of 27111
Pinnacle, the delay has pushed them back till when?
pinnacle
- 06 Jul 2006 19:31
- 17606 of 27111
The middle of July is next week - so I would expect something then.
I have written to Stanelco asking for confirmation of the date only yesterday so I will have some news tomorrow - I will then let you all know!
The closed period does not preclude them from giving an actual date.
G D Potts
- 06 Jul 2006 19:52
- 17607 of 27111
thanksa,
garyble
- 06 Jul 2006 19:55
- 17608 of 27111
Pinnacle,
Good points, but the one re: SEO's website stating ASDA's name and the number of machines is of no consequence. It is simply a re-hash of the 24th March 2005 RNS, they are still in the exclusivity period and until it ends I assume it still holds.
pinnacle
- 06 Jul 2006 20:20
- 17609 of 27111
Never assume anything!
If you are re-doing your web site then why include Asda if only for another month or so - might as well carry on with the old web site till the situation is clarified.
Re-doing web sites is expensive for a company of Stanelco's size so it would't make sense to have to do it twice!! - plus it would be embarassing.
Also RNS doesn't mean you can use that info for your web site - you will still need Asda's permission on the content you wish to use.
Everyone Happier?