Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Eureka Mining - time to spell it out (EKA)     

tallsiii - 11 Apr 2005 14:30

EKA are expecting to mine 3.8 million lbs of Molybdenum this year. For the more sceptical amongst you, read this to confirm:

http://moneyam.uk-wire.com/cgi-bin/articles/200412150700023844G.html

They own the mine and the molydbenum in it has been independently varified as stated in the announcement linked above.

Molydbenum currently trades at around $38.50 per lb, you can check this at:

http://www.monterrico.co.uk/s/MetalPrices.asp

so do the sums 3.8m x $39.25 = $149m = 82m

Eureka Mining's market cap is 26m

In 2006 they expect to pull over 10,000 tonnes (20m lbs) of Moly out of that mine.

On top of all that they have recently aquired a mine in Russia with estimated contained metal of 3.32 million tonnes of copper, 3.26 million
ounces of gold and 98.9 million pounds of molybdenum. They hope to complete the feasibility study for this one in 2006:

http://moneyam.uk-wire.com/cgi-bin/articles/200501130700033169H.html


PapalPower - 05 Jan 2006 01:26 - 176 of 215

I have highlighted a very relevent part of this news report, apart from the excellent prospects of Moly the bit about Chinese Traders stockpiling Moly for Q4 05, this caused the price to spike up, and is now causing a spike down from late Q4 05 into Q1 06, by Feb/Mar if not before the price will start to go up as these stockpiles are used up and these traders start to buy again I think.



http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_05/reser092205.html

MOLYBDENUM
The Big Secret

Ken Reser, Sept. 21/05

Subsequent to my previous report, "Molybdenum The 21st Century Metal" www.adanacmoly.com/articles/Moly_21st_Century_Metal-180KB.pdf I have done further extensive research for information on current and future uses of Molybdenum. This has been an undertaking of continual frustration & magnitude due to lack of mainstream information on this Noble Metal. Outside of the continual references to Molybdenum being used in stainless steel and other specialty metal alloys, fertilizers, lubricants and all the other uses I previously outlined in the 321 report (some of which are not reported in mainstream media) I have found what I consider the 'Big Secret' in regard to Molybdenum.

This so called secret involves considering that few people in the mining industry pay much attention to the Catalyst market for Molybdenum, if any at all. It is considered a small portion of the overall world demand in any charts, graphs or articles one may see and read. This is not the case as I see it from all of my own research. Consider why, when so many pundits and experts have continually called for the same dramatic and rapid decline in Molybdenum prices as we have seen in past when it spiked in price, that it has confounded all the predictions and has remained high for months on-end, all the while outliving those same wrongful predications. Today I believe there are little known, but yet profound changes afoot in the world of energy due to scientific discoveries in catalyst research that are outside the scope of most mainstream reports and articles on Molybdenum, and they are so dramatic and exciting that soon the entire Oil industry will soon be in shock. These changes being brought about by the new discoveries in the catalyst sciences involve coal, plastics and even used tires. The energy field I'm speaking of is 'Liquefaction'. In the 1950's and even earlier, Coal Liquefaction to produce fuel oils was known and studied in the USA, Germany, Japan and S Africa among others. Japan in 1940 produced 30,000 T of liquefied coal oil. Production continued until the end of WW2. Immediately after the end of the war the US military banned further research into coal liquefaction, alleging that it was military research. The process was costly and compared to the price of a barrel of Oil, not yet feasible. It has been stated that for Coal Liquefaction to be cost efficient and profitable, a barrel of crude must sell for $32.00. The Japanese have published reports stating $20.00 p/barrel. The better the catalyst functions, the higher the liquid yield rate becomes. Through international cooperation coal liquefaction has gone from the research stage to commercialization in Japan. Today China, Japan, Germany, Indonesia, & the USA have all embarked on projects with coal liquefaction. Before I continue with this discussion on the Liquefaction process tho, I would like to dwell on crude oil for a moment.

Today thanks to the scientific study of new age band catalysts, and Molybdenum Oxide, Nickel, Iron, Carbon & Cobalt compounds in particular, we now have catalysts that are helping refiners meet the stringent EPA & EEU pollution emission standards recently established. Sulfur is the culprit and the enemy of clean air and consequently due to the 2005 EPA standards (Diesel sulfur content has gone from 300 ppm to 50 ppm) the demand for refinery & hydro-cracking catalyst is going to increase dramatically. There is also another factor at work when considering the crude refinery catalyst demand.

For the last 20 to 30 years very few refineries have been built worldwide, and none in the USA. As I write this I'm reading of Venezuela building three new refineries and expanding two existing ones. China in a JV with its own Sinopec and Saudi Aramco & ExxonMobil have begun building their multi-billion-dollar refinery and petrochemical complex in China's Fujian province. Meanwhile a JV between Borealis & Abu Dhabi National Oil Co. is advancing another ethylene cracking facility in Abu Dhabi. One should be able to see the picture unfolding, "More Refineries" to come and most likely in Europe, Canada and the USA first. Other nations will invariably follow suit in this age of peak oil and rapidly increasing demand from developing nations like China, India, Brazil & SE Asia etc coupled with growth in the western world. The more refineries and hydro-cracking facilities in operation obviously mean's more Molybdenum catalyst demand. With less sweet crude now available and more sour heavy crude & Tar Sands Oil that has to be refined, it is going to mean a great increase in catalyst demand.

Next is the new looming production and market for (NG) Gas To Liquids Fuels (GTL). This market is fast becoming a reality and will invariably become a robust market for catalysts as well. GTL plants use catalysts of Cobalt/Iron/Molybdenum in the processes. Each GTL plant according to Bill Bell VP of Methanol & GTL Technology & Catalysts at Johnson Matthey "With GTL ready for ascension a big market for catalysts is now emerging & we are looking at thousands of tons plus of catalyst as inventory in a single plant". GTL plants (in 2003) are being considered in almost every corner of the globe that has reserves of NG, especially in areas like the Middle East where there is little local market for it & there are no pipelines to market NG. GTL converts natural gas (NG) into an easily exported liquid form. Shell in 2003 had a plant in operation in Malaysia & pursuing another in Qatar, as is Sasol Chevron. Chevron is also considering other plants in Nigeria, Australia & Caribbean. Exxon-Mobil is also interested in Qatar and Syntroleum is looking at Bolivian gas fields. BP is experimenting with a test plant in Alaska. (As this info on the GTL market is from 2003 I have no idea which projects may now be completed) So now I have outlined another little spoken of and upcoming demand on Molybdenum. The refinery demand for catalysts is already in the Billions of dollars and the worldwide demand for all the different combined types of catalyst uses in 2003 was approximately $7.5 Billion according to published reports.

According to a Roskill Metals report on catalysts (30/10/03) based on the steel industry states, Molybdenum demand has been growing at 2-4% p/a and in hydro-processing catalyst sector by 3-5% p/a. I believe now with higher emissions standards these latter catalyst demand percentages are now much higher if the truth be known. Also w/o going into detail for the sake of brevity in this report I will only touch on the fact that a Molybdenum/Ruthenium catalyst has been developed by Hitachi and other companies for a low cost Fuel Cell. We do know fuel cells will appear in cars, homes & industry in the near future. Washington State University (WSU) research teams have discovered an improved method of converting hydrocarbons (such as methane) into hydrogen and carbon dioxide using Molybdenum Carbide (Mo2C) as a catalyst. This conversion is an important step in fuel cell systems and processes that convert natural gas (NG) into useful petrochemicals. This patent is pending.

On another front Osiris in France and others involved in the world nuclear industry are testing a Uranium/Molybdenum enriched fuel for Nuclear reactors worldwide. This fuel will do away with using weapons grade Uranium in reactors and once perfected will be used throughout the world. The cost savings from low enriched fuel as opposed to the current highly enriched fuel is substantial as well.

Now lastly before I return to the Coal Liquefaction aspect that gave inspiration for this report, you should realize that the global demand for Molybdenum rose by 7.2% in 2004 to 374 million lbs from 349 m/lbs in 2003 as outlined in a study commissioned by International Molybdenum PLC and performed by CRU Strategies Ltd. mining consultants. Further CRU states that conservatively Molybdenum demand thru 2009 will grow by 3.5% to 4.1% p/a and the projected demand will be up to 475 million lbs in the same year. They also (CRU) project a deficit in Molybdenum production in 2008 and as much as a 14 million lb deficit in 2009. The theory of the world entering a "Super Commodities Cycle" is supported by recent reports by Citigroup-Smith Barney (China - The Engine of a Commodities Cycle, March 31 /05) and Goldman Sachs (Metals & Mining March 21 /05) and US Energy (Oil March 30/05) and along with the likes of the renowned Jim Rogers I believe this super cycle in finite resources is well underway and will last for many, many years to come.

The mining industry has been slow in responding to current growth in Molybdenum demand and low inventories. Several new projects, both primary and by-product have been promoted in recent months. Given the need for financing and environmental studies it is questionable if any or most of these projects will be producing by 2009. One or two projects seem to have the thrust, reserves and capability to achieve production in 2007/08 nonetheless. As another aside to the focus of this report it is also noteworthy to mention that a memo from the US Army Research Office: Research For Toxic Compound Destruction, states that the University of Pittsburg has shown that Molybdenum, in the presence of oxygen, is a true catalyst for destruction of nerve gas stimulant. A patent has been awarded on this work.

Now back to the Liquefacton portion of this report. The China Daily News online on the 03/12/2004 carried an interesting article on China's liquefaction projects. They stated in part that China has set up its first coal liquefaction research centre in Shanghai, a move to safeguard the nation's increasing oil supply shortage. The centre will explore and develop direct and indirect liquefaction technologies to produce gasoline & diesel fuel.

Shenhua Corp. one of China's largest coal companies w/ an 80% interest in this centre, has almost completed construction of a US $3.3 billion coal liquefaction plant in Inner Mongolia. Operations of this plant are expected to commence in 2005 to produce 1 million tons of gasoline and diesel fuel p/yr. By 2008 they expect to produce 5 million tons of oil with four more production lines. The second phase of the project will involve an additional investment of US $7.3 billion. Plans for two more coal to oil projects are on the shelf.

In another article by People's Daily news of Jan. 24/05 it is stated that by 2013, 10% of oil imports to China will have been replaced by coal liquefaction. The article also states that international indicators show that the process is profitable at between $22.00 to $28.00 US p/barrel and that the National Reform and Development Commission is considering making coal liquefaction one of China's key construction projects this year.

The other aspect of this trend towards liquefaction is the use of recycled tires and plastics in the process. The plastics alone it is estimated comprise approximately 21% by volume of US landfill sites. There is obviously no need to mention the quantities of used tires in the world. The process for the liquefaction involving tires & plastic is called Co-Processing and is achieved by combining feed-stocks of coal with the other two products simultaneously.

Without going into a long scientific and technical overview of the coal liquefaction & the co-processing technologies it is important to realize that the present success and feasibility of coal liquefaction is hinged on the recent perfection of an Iron/Molybdenum catalyst used in the de-sulfurization portion of the process. Soon you will be reading about another new scientific field concerning Molybdenum & Nano-Particle Technology. After all I have written about here in this report, it is my estimation and firm belief that we are now witnessing a historic time in the new expanding uses and demands on Molybdenum in the ever changing world of the Catalyst & Alloy Metals markets and those changes/discoveries are becoming more intense as time passes. To this end I believe now more than ever that,

"MOLYBDENUM IS THE METAL OF THE 21ST CENTURY"

(Post Script Notes) This report is not intended to infer that there is some conspiracy of silence afoot in the Molybdenum or Catalysts markets. In the title 'The Big Secret' simply refers to the seeming secrecy in the catalyst markets and to the lack of mainstream attention paid by mining media to Molybdenum.

Remember Molybdenum IS the biggest percentage dollar gainer of ANY metal in the last 18 months, and we hear little but negativity from media and mining websites.

Over the last few days I have read of Chinese Molybdenum traders stockpiling product for the end quarter of 2005 in order to have supply.

Sept 2/05 a London Mining article stated this in part- "Prices of Mo alloys all rose on Friday as buyers in search of large quantities found that the tightness of supply that had characterized the market in the early part of the year has not lifted." End

Yes there is a bottleneck in Roasting facilities and it is having some effect on Mo price, but why is there a bottleneck? Because demand is outstripping world roasting facilities. Quite simple really! With 5-7% more demand projected by various industry participants, I'd say they better get busy building a lot more roasters, and bringing new Primary Molybdenum Mines in the world onstream or we may see $50.00 p/lb Moly in future.

China's Metals Info Network, ANTAIKE on Aug 19/05 says new overseas roasting facilities will not be operational until after 2007.

Albemarle Catalysts of Louisianna who use approximately 10 million lbs of Molybdenum p/a, stated in a recent report- "We expect a 5% yearly growth rate in certain catalyst sectors" and so with the peak oil events facing the world and new refineries coming onstream (in Saudi Arabia & China) and expecting two more refineries in China as well as others around the globe, Tar Sands Oil, Coal Liquefaction, drilling exploration coupled with drill steel use & pipelines etc, the demand for Molybdenum & Cracking catalyst should continue to grow as will the specialty steel demand. Molybdenum has gained a new place of stature in the world's insatiable demand for noble metals.

New Update: According to the latest report from BCC Inc. Research, www.bccresearch.com/environ/C166R.html they estimate that by 2009 the market for Environmetal and Energy related Catalysts will grow by an average of 12.8% P/Yr. This is far beyond previous industry estimates I have outlined. Molybdenum it would seem has a bright future indeed.

If anyone has information on the Molybdenum markets they wish to share or would like to follow any of the Jr companies I represent please feel free to phone or email me anytime.


Ken Reser
Email: ykgold@telus.net
Ph: 403-844-2914

PapalPower - 09 Jan 2006 12:22 - 177 of 215

Just jumped up quickly, will we be getting news soon ?

PapalPower - 09 Jan 2006 13:23 - 178 of 215

Here is what the papers said earlier, they said it was close at the 21st Dec, so it could well be all done and signed now ;


"The Times 21st Dec 2005

Rumour of the day

Eureka Mining, the base metals explorer in which Celtic Resources owns 15 per cent, firmed 1p to 107p on AIM amid word that it was close to buying the 49 per cent of Russias Chelyabinsk copper and gold project it does not own. The company, which has an option to buy the stake for $6 million (3.5 million), raised 9 million at 125p in September, in part to fund the purchase. "


"The Times 6th Dec 2005

Further news:
*Wind taken out of sails of renewable energy project.
*Word that Eureka Mining (LSE: EKA.L - news) is close to buying the 49% of Russia's Chelyabinsk copper and gold project it does not own.
*US investor drawn to jewel in London Scottish Bank (LSE: LSB.L - news) 's crown."

PapalPower - 09 Jan 2006 14:52 - 179 of 215

tallsiii, keep your ear to the ground, rumours are that the Chelyabinsk deal is done, but its only rumour at the moment. I am hoping its confirmed and we get news this week.

PapalPower - 09 Jan 2006 15:54 - 180 of 215

Could be moving up again this afternoon, just swapped on L2 1 v 3 to now 3 v 1

rwakeley - 09 Jan 2006 16:04 - 181 of 215

PapalPower:-

Many thanks for all your endevours on providing info on this co, and the marketplace

In here last week - like the fact the shares bottomed out with the overall outlook
if rumours are true with regard to Chelyabinsk this has plenty of gas in the tank - just like VOG!

PapalPower - 09 Jan 2006 16:36 - 182 of 215

rwakeley, here should be no problem with returning to the recent placing price of 125p with or without any news. The target from Ambrian based on Moly is 175p, but if we got news of Chelyabinsk being 100% EKA, then I would see no problem being over 200p and in the range of 225p to 250p.

I think we have news coming, maybe in a day or a fortnight, will have to wait and see, but the movement today just after midday suggests news flow imminent.

tallsiii - 09 Jan 2006 19:56 - 183 of 215

If anyone hears anything from Foo or Bartley, then let us know.

PapalPower - 09 Jan 2006 23:11 - 184 of 215

tallsiii, I am hoping they tell us all first by a nice juicy operational update RNS.

PapalPower - 10 Jan 2006 11:44 - 185 of 215

Strong move up this morning, a shake down with some consolidation, makes a good base point for news to come. Tomorrow or Thursday ? I do hope so.

PapalPower - 10 Jan 2006 12:30 - 186 of 215

Looks like whoever took the 35K recently at 98p took profits today at 116p, well done. Hope they will be back in for news, before is best :) Bit of a problem if news is tomorrow, but thats the gamble people take when trading, some times you win, some times you miss out.

PapalPower - 11 Jan 2006 00:29 - 187 of 215

A solid day in the end, up, consolidation, then finish level. Roll on news.

PapalPower - 11 Jan 2006 11:15 - 188 of 215

Nice to see a move up, interesting shake before the move up and lots of B trades reported late from yesterday.

PapalPower - 11 Jan 2006 14:07 - 189 of 215

And moving up some more, this to me signals there is some good news around, just depends if it comes out this week, next week or not long after.

PapalPower - 11 Jan 2006 16:42 - 190 of 215

A good day again !

Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Code=EKA&Size=

Any chance you can put the 6 month and intraday charts in the header tallsiii ?

PapalPower - 12 Jan 2006 09:14 - 191 of 215

Moving up again and momentum building in, could get very exciting on good news now.

PapalPower - 12 Jan 2006 13:55 - 192 of 215

Looking strong again for another tick up today, its on a roll...........

PapalPower - 12 Jan 2006 15:42 - 193 of 215

Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Code=EKA&Size=Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Size=283*18

PapalPower - 13 Jan 2006 16:56 - 194 of 215

Consolidation at the end of a good week, lets have some more upwards again for next week then :)

PapalPower - 13 Jan 2006 16:56 - 195 of 215

A small summary as to why things are getting exciting now, just in case any newbies are wondering, its due to Q1 06 Moly concentrate production, the story is below ;


On August 20, 2005 President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan azarbayev visited Stepnogorsk town. In the course of the visit the Head of State had discussions with Moukhtar Dzhakishev, President of Kazatomprom, and Eshmurat Pirmatov, General Director of Stepnogorsk Mining and Chemical Complex (SMCC).

In September 2004 Kazatomprom took over the SMCCs hydrometallurgical plant, sulphuric acid production, and uranium mine No.1 in Shantobe, as well as their auxiliary facilities on trust management terms. The takeover resulted in quick restart of major production lines and ensured full capacity operations, which provided jobs and paid salary to more than 2900 employees.

Moukhtar Dzhakishev reported to the Head of State of the facilitys current status and development strategy through year 2010.

The Head of States approved the plans on SMCC development and particularly noted the importance of molybdenum production being established in Kazakhstan; he wished the SMCC staff success in implementation of its plans, which will improve the living standards of population in Steptogorsk town.

One sixth of the world explored reserves of molybdenum (249,000 tons) is located in Kazakhstan. Yet, there was no molybdenum production before. Molybdenum is widely used to produce special steel grades and as catalyst in oil-refining industry.

Based on the research by Kazatomprom and SMCC under Mr. Pirmatovs guidance, a unique technological scheme of obtaining molybdenum oxide was successfully tested at SMCC, and produced its first output of molybdenum oxide to the visit by the Head of State to Stepnogorsk. Laboratory tests proved the product conformity to international quality standards.

The facility will undertake three-month construction of enrichment facility for one million tons of molybdenum ore per year, and installation of commercial scale equipment to produce 1000 tons molybdenum oxide per year starting from 2006.

The molybdenum raw material will be supplied from Shorskoye deposit (21,000 ton reserves) by Molyken LLP joint venture between SMCC/Kazatomprom and British Eurika Mining. In addition, Kyzyltu and Seletinsk copper-molybdenum deposits are deemed to be future raw material feed sources.

In accordance with Kazatomprom program, more than USD$180mln will be invested between 2005 and 2007 in development of the complex to ensure efficient production in the long run.




Implementation and schedule

Utilising the Stepnogorsk processing facility allows Eureka to develop the Shorskoye asset and take advantage of the buoyant molybdenum market, commencing mining in Q3 05 and saleable concentrate by Q1 06. The key project milestones
are:

August 2005 - award contracts
August 2005 - first blast and ore to crusher
September 2005 - first ore to Stepnogorsk
October 2005 - first equipment to Stepnogorsk
January 2006 - concentrator commissioning
February 2006 - first concentrate
Register now or login to post to this thread.