bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
greekman
- 11 Jul 2006 08:22
- 17648 of 27111
Morning, All.
OK back to SEO (my fault for starting it). Still think Friday, as this is the last working day prior to the 16th which is past the date hinted at by my previous E-Mail from the company.
angusrjy
- 11 Jul 2006 10:55
- 17649 of 27111
I have emailed SEO to try and get a date, all Sylvia said was they are still working towards Mid July. I have sent another email asking if they are gonna release a date first or just suddenly release them sometime in mid July.
Mad Pad
- 11 Jul 2006 13:39
- 17650 of 27111
Didn't Captain Guide say there would be news on Thursday,God what a sorry state of affairs for people to take any notice of him!I'm out but watching, maybe not for much longer.
greekman
- 11 Jul 2006 13:53
- 17651 of 27111
In todays technological world, as we all know info can be input to files and retrieved at the push of a button. Using this reasoning, I can only see one valid reason why there is this delay from last years date. They are waiting on a contract to be signed. OK I have put my thoughts/reasoning on the line, so I just hope I am right. I am now going to the nearest field (next door) and intend to dig a very deep hole to hide in, old WW2 hat at the ready, just in case I have called it wrong.
pinnacle
- 11 Jul 2006 15:36
- 17652 of 27111
Greekman,
Your statement is what makes life worth living!!
A sense of humour - so lacking today - is so much appreciated.
Well done.
greekman
- 11 Jul 2006 17:54
- 17653 of 27111
Cheers,
So I might not have to dig after all.
But seriously, I do think and hope I have got it right.
Fred1new
- 11 Jul 2006 18:47
- 17654 of 27111
So do a lot of other voyeurs.
Mind have a look at the pathway of RTD, it seems to be coming good a last.
Sharesure
- 11 Jul 2006 19:21
- 17655 of 27111
greekman, I have the same thought and I cannot be bothered to dig a hole which I do not think will be needed anyway; why else would a company defer issuing information which everyone knows will not make pleasant reading as far as figures are concerned and particularly as it has had its recent Placing to put it in funds for a while yet? If my hunch is wrong then a few directors might like to explain what they have been trying to do these last few weeks.
Balerboy
- 11 Jul 2006 23:19
- 17656 of 27111
Just topped up with somemore, Greekman:- in the farming community the answer always lies in the soil!! Your hole maybe needed, we'll all be jumping in if this goes wrong. lol.
greekman
- 12 Jul 2006 08:15
- 17657 of 27111
Cheers, Sharesure,Balerboy,
I will dig it bigger just in case we all need it.
automatic
- 12 Jul 2006 13:36
- 17658 of 27111
100,000 buy dosn't alter the SP, 223 sell moves SP lower
greekman
- 12 Jul 2006 15:06
- 17659 of 27111
Looking back at L2, the price only dropped for the sell via sets re the 223. The next buy price to the previous one was 7.93p so up .06p from 7.87p.
Also it is often what is going on in the background between the order book that makes these tiny insignificant moves. OH to be a fly on the wall in the MM's offices.
Biscuit
- 12 Jul 2006 21:09
- 17660 of 27111
Interesting on the AFX about Wal-Mart discussing global warming steps.
NielsJensen
- 12 Jul 2006 22:00
- 17661 of 27111
garyble
- 12 Jul 2006 22:09
- 17662 of 27111
"TechNeeds are anonymous requests for technology"
NielsJ,
I could have posted it!
automatic
- 12 Jul 2006 23:16
- 17663 of 27111
does this mean that Wal Mart said thankyou for the idea but we will go elswhere for the product, or have i got it completly wrong (AGAIN)
zscrooge
- 13 Jul 2006 08:41
- 17664 of 27111
.
zscrooge
- 13 Jul 2006 08:41
- 17665 of 27111
.
zscrooge
- 13 Jul 2006 08:43
- 17666 of 27111
5 July
Captain guide reporting. SEO will bring very very good news soon along with the interims on Thursday next week. ( I have to say that I heard some rumours)
Still time, I suppose.
angusrjy
- 13 Jul 2006 08:53
- 17667 of 27111
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz