The tiny Irish stock on the brink of landing 'the first' post-sanction oil deal in Iraq. Ref 'Fleet Street Letter' 12-04-04..

Hi' Jamie, this is getting exciting .

you still awake tokyo,
what are you on!!. at least this is exciting, just watch it go north when we get an rns, even if confirming the worst, but we still have the other projects .
dexter

Tokyo, if you and your friends have any integrity left you will now apologise to the investors you have mislead over the past three months and disappear from the bbs for good.
I somehow doubt it though, your type were born too far down the line to have any shame in you!

Spreads getting silly now .

Agreed, dd, let's cut out the name-calling.

What I'd really like is some views on what the share price should settle at even if there turns out to be no good news from Iraq. i.e. how good a piece of news commercially is the Jordanian agreement?

Kellman:
whoever you are please no personal attacks on (dexter)other posters. We are here for the information researched by these avid posters. As of yet, very little posted on this BB is total rubbish (exept that posted by visiting posters)In the main this info has guided fellow investor through the stormy times and brought a sense of sanity to the insane share that is Petrel. This share was almost certainly criminally manipulated yesterday, for profit, not by accident, not by a bad journo'or a leak from MOO but by Criminals.
However I see this as possible good positive sign for Petrel. Why release that crap news via reuters if this share was doomed???

Let us not forget this thread started approx eight months since so let us not forget this share was then 33p-ish even today still showing a profit.

dexter - Yes still here, and I think you are right, Kellman is indeed "SimonSelf",just look at the language he uses"your type were born too far down the line to have any shame in you!" and he is now requesting we leave the BB's how idiotic can one person be? BB's are for sharing information and opinions, sometimes our thoughts are wrong, time will tell with regards to PET, but none of the information Dexter and I have shared has been anything but solid.

I of course feel sorry for anyone who lost money, as I'm one of them, but once again, anyone investing in any company knows the risks before they buy the shares. I certainly do, and do not go looking to blame anyone for my mistakes, or praise anyone for my successes, you do your research, you pays your money and you takes your choice.

This will be the last time I talk with you, Kellman "Simple Simon Self", anymore abuse and it will be a simple e-mail to moneyam, over here they don't put up with with the abuse as with ADVFN, this is a thread about investing, whatever your needs are, go find them elsewhere.

Tokyo

OK,

Seems to have gotten a little heated on this thread. Please stick to the topic and not fellow posters.

Ian
MoneyAM

tokyo , been following and yes just a visitor and agree re name calling , send em all back to the other side but what do you make of the news blackout , I've never seen anything like it in this sort of situation?

iNFURIATING, but there is so much more to this im sure!

still no RNS from PET that is the guide for me, if no future for their tenders they would have said. At the same time if good news then the same applies, think what it will be like in that office

watcher

scottie7, I can`t believe you have posted this nonsense: "Let us not forget this thread started approx eight months since so let us not forget this share was then 33p-ish even today still showing a profit."
Eight months ago PET directors and chairman were telling the world at large that they had the Iraqi contracts in the bag,and it was only a matter of sitting back and waiting until you all became millionaires with folk like you, Tokyo, dexter, etc. making mind bogglingly stupid forecasts of PET reaching 25 per share by Xmas. One idiot even said it would go to 5 BEFORE the contracts were announced!!.

Some were so taken in by your ramping that they had booked up luxury holidays and cruises with the intention of paying for them out of their profits from PET for pity`s sake!.
Even now you lot won`t give up ramping, an earlier poster, after castigating me for what he thought was a deramping post said he believed the share price would shoot up to 90p within the HOUR!
I FEEL THERE IS SOME SORT OF COLLUSION GOING ON HERE AMONG A CERTAIN GROUP OF POSTERS WHOSE AIM IS TO KEEP RAMPING THIS STOCK WHAT EVER HAPPENS.
DON`T BE TAKEN BY THEM, THEY ARE DANGEROUS!.

Mes amities Aldwick !!!!! ,,l hope to be back in contact with you very soon mon ami .l left Pershings/citigroup after absolutely refusing to allow them to copyright almost everything i wrote. l was severely censored after both the scathing attack i wrote about PET and strangely enough for much older posts -namely - the JKX and NOP articles i wrote for the ADVFN and AOL boards ,,,,,,,,,,But you know me ... am working for da Queen herself now lol Yep i got the senior energy anaylists postion at you know where .......Been bored stuff at the recent OPEC meeting in Vienna surrounded by sweaty Arabs talking thier characteristic usual twaddle /waffle and meaningless talk of quotas They sing to one tune in public and yet dance to a totally different one in private ,,,,,,,As for Pet ,,,Teeling has lost the plot here ,,,,,the MMS are playing with us all ,,,, c'est creve ou marche ici ,,lol Bonne chance !! But errr ,,,,exiting ? LS THAT THE RIGHT ADJECTIVE IN IN THIS INSTANCE ,,LOL ,,,,,,,A'BIENTOT ,,,@+ J

I think everybody has expressed their opinion now, and any further personal attacks will not be tolerated - please stick to the discussion in hand, be it positive or negative.

Ian
MoneyAM

an e-mail has been sent to moneyam concerning kellman, in the meantime please do not respond to him, as that is how he ruined the advfn thread as Simonself, we run the risk of this turning this thread into an arguement instead of a discussion.

Lets keep the discussion on Petrel resources

Kellman,
Could you please point to the actual statement by the Pet directors which you refer to?
It seems to me that DH, in particular, is getting a bad rap here. I've heard of statements that he is supposed to have made, but can find none that have gone out under his name. The press is notoriously innaccurate in reporting off the record conversations.
That goes for PRE as well as PET. It seem to me that some calm is required here. You can be sure that PET will release a statement as soon as it has any sound, reliable information. To do otherwise would be doing exactly what it is accused of now.

Kellman
Yes of course we believe in company and yes maybe petrel will some day take off and reach dizzy heights, i also believe that too.
However at no time could this stock be considered a xmas sell as a tenbagger, being a long term holding we can expect the price to rise steady over the coming months and years.
As for the rampng or otherwise, Do your own research and evaluate the true potential of Petrel should it be truly in favour as I believe it to be in the Middle east, In your research you will soon come accross the, Petrel food lifts to the Iraqi people, Statements of support on the World stage and the value and potential of untapped resources.
Of course they may not get the contracts and then they will not rise as quickly, but their future is certainly in the middle east but remain a speculative buy!
Did you speculate this morning???
I did and increased my holding by 15%!!!!!!
yes that is why I trade shares, promise.
AF

Tokyo, thanks for that, through to form you and your friends try to stifle open debate and direct the flow in one direction.
I picked the following extract from yesterday`s reuters news re the contracts and it proves what I have always said that the oil lifting contracts could not and would not be given out by an interim government. So all forecasts for PET share price IF they got a contract were severely flawed because most posters mistakenly believed that the contracts also included oil production rights which as you can see from the following isn`t true.

Unlike production sharing contracts Iraq could negotiate with oil majors after elections due in January, "the contracts do not involve contractors after construction or as operators."
Ahmed Chamma, another ministry official in charge of projects, declined to confirm the two companies that won the contracts but said that their names had been presented to the council of ministers for approval.

http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/company/cnm42926.htm


Everasia does not exist? then what is this item all about?


volume 9, issue #14 - Wednesday, July 21, 2004


sponsored by:


Shell turns down chance for first Iraqi oil deal
09-07-04 European oil giant Shell has turned down the chance to win the first foreign upstream oil production contract in post-war Iraq, saying the terms on offer from Baghdad's new interim government were not good enough. Despite security concerns, Shell told it considered bidding for production work on the billion-barrel Khurmala Dome field in northern Iraq.
"We obtained a copy of the tender but the scope and contract format are not compatible with our aspirations for long-term risk-reward contracts," a Shell spokesman said.

Typically oil majors like to secure a 15-20 % return on 25-30 year contracts. Since the war ended last May work by foreign contractors in Iraq's vast oilfields, the world's second largest, has been limited mostly to short-term infrastructure repair contracts led by companies like US Halliburton.
Security worries have severely limited the number of foreign bids for rehabilitation projects now on offer for three Iraqi oilfields. Shell's leading competitors BP and the US oil majors show no sign yet of contemplating entry into Iraq.

Baghdad is hoping to award contracts by the end of August after extending the deadline for bids five times, industry insiders familiar with the tenders said. They said the tender for Khurmala Dome that took Shell's interest is worth $ 100 mm ($ 154 mm) worth of investment, small by Shell standards. Shell was the only big name oil company that took interest in the tenders, they said. Small UAE, Irish and Turkish companies also bid for the projects -- part of a plan to help raise output by 20 % by the end of this year.
"Interest was limited. Oil officials are confident that the projects will be finally awarded," said one Arab oil executive involved in the tenders.

The other fields up for rehabilitation are the 2.2 bn barrel southern Suba-Luhais at $ 150 mm and the smaller northern Hamrin field at a cost of $ 80 mm. Ireland's Petrel is bidding for all three, managing director David Morgan told. Dome, a UAE company, and EverAsia from Turkey also have bid, Iraqi sources said.
Iraq wants to restore production capacity to pre-war volumes of about 3 mm bpd from some 2.5 mm bpd now. Funding shortages and security problems have delayed 150 oil ministry projects. These are separate from $ 1.8 bn of US-funded projects that have also run into delay.

But after a reshuffle at the oil ministry, head of projects Ahmad al-Shamma is planning to move plans forward.
The ministry invited international companies to bid for a pipeline project in the centre of the country and another tender to construct a new pipeline linking the Kirkuk fields to the Beiji refinery is expected to be issued this month.



Source: New Zealand Herald



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

seawalker - I sent an e-mail to paul, the owner of that site that posted the article about the minnow oil companies being involved with the Iraqi tenders, but he knew nothing about Everasia, as he had not written the article just picked it up from another news source, his only comment was that Everasia was a strange name for an oil company, although that is not to say they don't exist, but here perhaps is the company IOG, although correctly OGI, this could have been the company DH was talking about yesterday to lemming investors.

http://www.ogigroup.com/

Oh well enough screen watching today, I'll be back on Monday, to see where we are and what is in store for PET.

Tokyo