Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Fred1new, you are what you are, but the bit you can change is to accept there can be no excuse for calling someone Aids, no matter the provocation. But then in the hypocritical world you live there you seem to be able to find an excuse for everything you say or do. Incidentally, I have yet to read any satire in your posts, just mockery, which on its own, I have to tell you is not humorous.

Dream on,

The image would seem to be more representative of you and and your thought processes, which at times seem to me, to be a little scrambled.

On the other hands the image could be representative of the UK in 12 months time.

==========

Hays,

You are at you coherent best!

Perhaps, you don't like the message, or more probably, it is just that you wish to demonstrate a blind adherence to your party's line.

(If only the PR machine could come up with a suitable one.)

------------

Post 17819

That will cause more even more confusion, when you take your partners home to your "mum".

Chucks,

Once again, I suggest you read the whole thread, before making an uninformed judgement.

If having done so, you hold the same opinion that is your prerogative.

-----------

Freda,

I don't need to, inexcusable is just plain old inexcusable.

There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see.

It seems to me that you also may need Aid.

Fred1new - 29 Jul 2012 17:26 - 17824 of 17825

There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see.

It seems to me that you also may need Aid.

You're a nasty piece of work Fred1new. The use of a capitalised A in your Aid is tantamount to wishing Aids on me, dropping the s isn't much in the way of camouflage. Sick, very, very sick but that's your personality and something you have to live with. I feel utterly sorry for your poor family.

Why don't you post evidence to excuse your behaviour? Oh, there isn't any evidence, silly me.

Tut, Tut!

You make your own associations based on you own circumstances and interpretations.

From Digital Look

Sunday newspaper round-up: BoE, RBS, Weir

The British Chambers of Commerce and the Ernst & Young Item Club, the only forecasters to use the Treasury’s economic model, have both urged the Bank of England to take bold action to boost growth at Wednesday’s meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee [MPC]. The economy has shrunk for three successive quarters according to figures published by the Office for National Statistics last week, which said the UK’s GDP fell by 0.7 per cent between April and June. Andrew Goodwin, senior economic advisor to Item, said: “We do think there should be a rate cut. The Bank could go down to the rates in the US – 0.0 to 0.25 per cent. It is not the only answer, but it would help.” Since March 2009 the Bank base rate has remained at 0.5 per cent - the lowest level in the Bank’s 300 year history. A further rate cut could reduce mortgage repayments for millions of homeowners and would ease borrowing costs for businesses, The Sunday Telegraph reports.

Lol, you and everyone else who reads your pathetic associations will know exactly what you meant. You are a very disturbed individual, odd you continue to post, when from what I can gather, you are probably the most disliked (by a country mile) contributor to this blog.

The site is nearly talk to yourself, Im staying away from now on chuckles, perhaps you should as well.

You'll be missed Dreamcatcher, therefore you should stay. In fact MoneyAm should pay you to stay for your daily contributions. I wonder why the management don't get rid of internet trolls like Fred1new who I'm sure stop other posters contributing and perhaps influence them to leave the site. Crazy business to let one person to ruin a business.

Fred
I have seen that article (published in the Sunday Telegraph).
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/9434400/Slash-interest-rates-to-0-per-cent-Bank-of-England-told.html

In 1975 there was an amnedment to the Industry Act of that year called the Bray amendment, which required the Treasury to make its model available for public use in a computer readable form. One of the users is indead the Item Club (Independent Treasury Modelling Group). The trouble is that the model made available is one to two years out of date and the Treasury gives no indication of how the results are adjusted using judgement.

In fact the treasury does not have a model at all these days as responsibility for it and the model was given over to the Office of Budget Responsibilty some time ago.

I have had some dealings with the OBR and the whole government macro economic modelling process over the last year or so in connection with some research.

The article is also wrong in that there are plenty of groups using the model. The Economist and the University of Warwick also use it.

Thanks chucks, thisb sditevis just about labour. Try again, been a heavy night :-))

This site is a labour site only, with no other contributers on here.

Are you real Fred? Cannot for one minute believe you. You are winding us up ?

Just do what greekman ,This_is_me and I have done and squelch him

Bye Fred. aldwickk IM with you.

Your the JOKER FRED

Sadly missed.

dreamcatcher....great pic....first class pic of a w***** can you do one of pro