for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

angusrjy
There are dozens of different types of trays that could be biodegradable and GS that is the potential of seo
This from the Mondini Web Site click away.
http://www.gmondini.com/htm_uk/applications.asp

Greenseal can be used re most such plastic type trays as they are usually made from (Polyethylene terephthalate). Creation: Production of 1 kg of PET requires the equivalent of about 2 kg of oil (raw material and energy).
Greenseal also saves up to 20% on packaging costs by eliminating the need for a PE layer for example seals mono APET to mono APET
APET is suitable for use between -40C and +70C. APET is an extremely tough material with good impact strength. APET is an extremely effective barrier against oxygen, water, carbon dioxide and nitrogen.

I lost 150 in a Dyson cleaner once - it came out in a lot better shape that the 10 I lost in a washing machine. Mind you there are some ASDA meals that don't survive cooking, let alone the packaging.

Just wanted to add the sumof my knowledge to the great debate that is SEO.

I've been wrestling with (Giant) Haystacks seering analysis of SEO and, frankly, I'm floored.

sd

I really dont know why we are bothering with seo there are so many experts on this thread we could open our own packaging company using Bostic to seal the lids and be well ahead of seo.

Bostic is not environmentally friendly enough because it is high in VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds).
Much better to use flour and water. Similar to Greenseal really.
And if we did it with a machine that used an air vortices for the MAP element we could outdo Dyson at the same time.
Alan

New Packaging can save money.

Relative cost of unsaleable goods falls in 2005

By Ahmed ElAmin
19/07/2006 - Manufacturers managed to reduce the relative cost of reimbursing retailers for unsaleable goods in 2005, indicating they may have turned a corner in combatting a $2bn problem.
The costs of returning or disposing of unsaleable goods is usually borne by retailers, distributors, and manufacturers. The payments depend on the agreements between the manufacturer and the retailer, the type of product, and the reasons for not being able to sell the goods.
For full article....
http://www.foodproductiondaily-usa.com/news/ng.asp?n=69261-unsaleables-gma-fmi
Everyone will be looking to jump on the bandwagon, hopefully SEO's.

Seos alternative investors packaging machines.

New Packaging can save money, but not if you are a SEO shareholder.

Bags the one with the duck.

Sold out today at a 5-figure () loss. The worst day of my investing life. So be it. I was steered into this co., I was given the Intel., I funded it way above my normal amount, I listened, I read, I researched (although not as deeply as I really should have done) and the final decisions as to whether to buy or sell some or all, over the past 12 months or so, always rested with ME. We were all mislead & lied to. But that's life. **it happens. Regardless, in the end, it was MY responsibilty. I will stop there.

I WISH EVERY OTHER STANELCO SHAREHOLDER EVERY SUCCESS FOR 2006 AND BEYOND. I will monitor from time to time with interest especially as now that yours truly is OUT, the sp is bound to rocket! Expect a Greenseal announcement any day soon, I'm sure!

But, for me, that's it.

GOOD LUCK TO ALL...

Thanks for the good wishes, ma.
Taking the loss on the chin is probably a braver decision than those of us trying to ride it out.
Alan

Sorry to hear that, Markus. As Alan says, a brave decision. For those left in, I can remember when my original holding, bought at 6p, dropped to 3.6p - I came close to making the same decision as Markus, but held. The true value of a share is what you sell it for. Thats why I'm ignoring the SP at the moment - I'm confident that even if the sales of Greenseal dont hit the dizzy heights we were all predicting a year ago, that there will be SOME sales and the SP can only rise.

Bye markusantonius good luck in your future investments.

oblomov
Im the same as you Oblo Ive got my head well and truly stuck in the sand on this one.

Bad luck Markus, I hope you will be able to recoup your losses on this one some day.
kim

Yes,Markus.

Nice to see someone who has lost out not blaming everyone else.
Obviously only time will tell if you made the right decision. Whatever happens to the sp, it was a brave decision, and those of us still in will perhaps if it totally dives, wish we had your bottle. Sometimes it's just as gutsy to sell at a lost than to stay in. Like the rest, wishing your other investments don't loose out.
Good luck.

Who'd sell 6 shares? 30p raised and 7 + dealing costs!

It was an autotrade. The orderbook works on matched bargains. A SELL trade may have been put on at say 50,000. As matched trades come in matching at the price then the volume reduces until it is used up. The final part was probably 6 shares. It is also not always possible to tell if AT trades are buys or sells anyway. A trade is just put in the order book. You can buy at the SELL price or the opposite. It is the way that most trades are done in the US for in stance. The 'O' trades are usually MM trades, the rest being almost all order book.

It is all a lot clearer if you have Level 2.

I had wondered what was going on with the trades on this stock as on some days there are very few AT trades and the price is reasonably stable. On other days, there is a significant percentage of AT's and the price is quite volatile, generally downwards. It looks as though there could be a move to have this stock AT driven.

Could someone shed any light on what dictates and AT or MM trade?

AT trades are as Haystack says, automated trades. A trade goes in at a set price (AT trades known as SETS) either buy or sell into the order book. When an equal Sets price meets it, it is auto buy or sell. So if you want to sell at 1 and put it onto Sets, and I want to buy at 1 when my order matches yours the deal is done.
MM's are the market makers who also set prices but can accept less for a buy, more for a sell or at that price.
Of course MM's can put a price on the Sets if they receive an order from clients (brokers) at that price.
Someone may explain better, but thats basically it.
If you go onto trades section on Moneyam, and go into help, it explains very well.