bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
bosley
- 20 Jul 2006 22:10
- 17917 of 27111
driver, be fair.
"Snip - 03 Nov 2005 19:31 - 58 of 60
very little support then 10p followed by 8p
This is happening quicker than expected
seo is weak "
angusrjy
- 20 Jul 2006 22:58
- 17918 of 27111
Just read this from April by Terry Robins, not sure if you've read it??
http://profitthroughinnovation.com/content/view/184/
greekman
- 21 Jul 2006 07:54
- 17921 of 27111
OB,
All I am going by is the material make-up of the product. I can't find anything that states it is OK at oven type temperatures. Also can't find anything in the SEO info that states the same, so not rumor making, just thinking that if it was cooker friendly they would have mentioned it. I hope I am wrong as obviously this would make for an even better product.
Cheers Greek.
hewittalan6
- 21 Jul 2006 08:02
- 17922 of 27111
I'm no scientist, and definitely no cook, but..........
If I cook a piece of food then surely the food gets to the same temperature as the oven it is in. Given that the food is in contact with its packaging, the packaging must also reach that temperature. Surely exactly the same applies when microwaving? The oven itself does not reach the temperature, but the food (and by extension) the packaging does?
If you need to cook chicken to X degrees, it matters not the type of oven. the temperature of the chicken, and therefore the packaging, will be the same.
Perhaps someone more familiar with kitchens and less familiar with takeaways will disabuse me of this notion.
I thought it was merely the containers metal content or the type of food that made it suitable for one or the other.
Alan
Tonyrelaxes
- 21 Jul 2006 08:20
- 17923 of 27111
I get pretty firework displays when I microwave meals in metal trays - just adds to the delights I discovered on being divorced!
Tony
oblomov
- 21 Jul 2006 08:22
- 17924 of 27111
greek, sorry if you thought I was accusing you of rumour mongering. Absoulutely not. It was just that several people including you had discussed this point and at the oher end I saw a post that indicated that it was now taken as a fact that Starpol couldn't be put in the oven. People could read that and then make another post, etc etc and we don't know if it's fact or fiction in reality. I was accusing all of us. No offence intended.
Alan,
I'm no scientist either but doesn't a microwave work by accelerating and moving the water molecules in the food? Items not containing water, such as plates, containers, etc. dont heat up (except for a little by normal heat transfer from the heated item).
hewittalan6
- 21 Jul 2006 08:27
- 17925 of 27111
Thats how I understand it oblo. A by-product of the magnatron designed for radar purposes during WW2. That the point. If there were water present in the SEO product, then biodegredation would surely start at manufacture (as this requires moisture and higher temperatures), or it would contaminate the food.
Consensus opinion........buggered if we know.
Alan
kimoldfield
- 21 Jul 2006 08:28
- 17926 of 27111
A microwave oven uses microwaves to heat food. Microwaves are radio waves. In the case of microwave ovens, the commonly used radio wave frequency is roughly 2,500 megahertz (2.5 gigahertz). Radio waves in this frequency range have an interesting property: they are absorbed by water, fats and sugars. When they are absorbed they are converted directly into atomic motion -- heat. Microwaves in this frequency range have another interesting property: they are not absorbed by most plastics, glass or ceramics. Metal reflects microwaves, which is why metal pans do not work well in a microwave oven.
If you put a microwave meal in a convential oven the packaging becomes more stressed and will become distorted to a degree. Fundamentally a microwave meal should be heated only in a microwave oven, otherwise the purpose is wasted.
End of science lesson for today!
kim
greekman
- 21 Jul 2006 08:35
- 17927 of 27111
OB,
None taken,no problem did not think you did but just wanted to justify my comments (I like you hate the rumor mongers).
Alan,
Not fully right re the food (like you no scientist, even got the litmus test wrong at school). I understand it depends on the molecules, and fat,water content.
As to packaging, if you look at aluminum foil, greaseproof paper for example they get no where near the temp of the food (it's them darn molecules again).
Also as OB states microwaves move the molecules round so only heat created in the food (also as said a bit by heat transfer).
As to Starpol oven qualities, still can't find anything that states it is oven friendly although hope I am wrong.
If anyone knows different, it would make me happier as obviously Starpol would be an even better product than I thought it was.
Kim,
I bet you got the litmus test right as well. Cheers for the tech info.
Only just seen the last couple of posts as it takes me quite a while to type out my posts (useless at science and a techniphobe to boot).
Oilywag
- 21 Jul 2006 08:51
- 17928 of 27111
'Morning all
I am going to run a litmus test on SEO and ask them if they know whether their starpol 2000 and maybe 3000 is microwavable without any adverse toxins seeping into the food.
The oily one
I had a litmus test at school and failed.
It was for intelligence!
greekman
- 21 Jul 2006 09:25
- 17929 of 27111
Oilywag,
It is microwave friendly with no adverse toxins seepage, re the FDA approval which looked into all contact with food matters, including heating etc.
angusrjy
- 21 Jul 2006 09:47
- 17930 of 27111
I have emailed Adept Ploymers to find out RE the oven question, will post if i get a reply
garyble
- 21 Jul 2006 10:53
- 17931 of 27111
Alan et. al,
I'm no scientist, but am an engineer. My take on the oven question is: Conventional oven cooking is reliant on heat transfer, from the surface to the core, the bigger the difference between the external and internal temperature the higher the heat transfer. I assume that one cannot heat the core for too long at or above water boiling point as this will result in a hard, dry lump.
So the key to oven cooking is to heat the core to say ~100 degrees for a period of time. Also, for textue and aesthetics, a degree of roasting/browning may be required which would need a high surface temperature.
Microwaving is more efficient and results in a lower external temprature but generally result in anemic chicken etc..
A bit garbled but hope it makes some sense.
oblomov
- 21 Jul 2006 11:07
- 17932 of 27111
Thanks gary - but does Starpol explode and burn the house down when put in an oven or will chicken tika masala eaters the world over be safe?
Thats the question for today!
Can all ready made meals (currently) be put in both MW and conventional ovens?
dawall
- 21 Jul 2006 12:20
- 17933 of 27111
What do people majke of the 2 x 1 million + trades yesterday? Does anyone know / think this could be an institution building or adding, maybe Fidelity or Goldman Sachs or simply a PI with too much spare cash?
oblomov
- 21 Jul 2006 13:26
- 17934 of 27111
automatic
- 21 Jul 2006 14:03
- 17935 of 27111
several million more buys than sells over the last few days, even today the buys way outnumber the sells , but MMs are managing to walk theSP down, i knew they wouldn't let us down?
jimward9
- 21 Jul 2006 14:48
- 17936 of 27111
Greenseal seals starpol using microwaves, so I would think the trays would melt, in any type of oven.