overgrowth
- 06 Oct 2003 22:47
beemer2
- 12 Jul 2007 20:28
- 1799 of 2037
IAN...MAY I SUGGEST YOU CONTACT COH AS YOU KNOW THE REAL NAME OF David10B AS THEY HAVE A VERY LARGE DOSSIER ON HIM.
YOU WILL HOPEFULLY THEN REALISE WHO YOU ARE DEALING WITH.
PS...ALSO GET IN TOUCH WITH ADVFN AND YOU WILL FIND OUT THAT JIM BENTLEY DAVIS IS THE SAME PERSON AND THEY ARE ALSO FED UP WITH HIM ON THEIR COH THREAD.
AdieH
- 12 Jul 2007 22:13
- 1800 of 2037
I have to say it is a real shame that a once great thread has degenerated into this (I include myself in this as a culprit). I used to enjoy coming on here to exchange views on a share I hold and a company that I see doing the right things for its investors and customers. The only comfort I take is the other boards that David posts on have also degenerated so it says something more about David than the rest of us... I cannot believe David has retired as someone of that age should really know how to act better and if he is married I feel very sorry for his wife and family because if he acts like this on a bulletin board God knows what he is like in real life... I am tempted to delete MoneyAM from my favourites and not post on here again... Good Luck to posters on here you will need it whilst David continues to post. Regards a happy COH holder but disillusioned bulletin board poster...
David10B
- 12 Jul 2007 22:39
- 1801 of 2037
Adieh you used to enjoy have it all your own way and imparting your views and nothing else. I now formally take the strongest objection you your personal posting and like you will now run crying to Ian to have you, it or both removed.
You seem to thrive on threats and intimidation--so dont say you are going--just go!
David10B
- 12 Jul 2007 22:41
- 1802 of 2037
Look guys if you want to ban me then go ahead and an me, but please give your solid reasons for doing so as there are laws to protect my right to free speech on a public BB.
So what is so offensive to you?.
Is it my total ignorance of the market and how its works?
Well that being the case I am, as I said right from the start, here to learn.
Are all you illustrious opposers of mine, opposed too as well to educating the ignorant? Which I humbly confess to be on most things
Or could there be a more sinister rational?
Could it be that people such as AHIEH and beemmer, angry people at best, are annoyed that I have busted up their comfortable taitatait rampings of COH--the more they ramp the more suckers get drawn in etc etc.
I have exposed COH for what I believe it to be and called it right dead right and now there is obviously more to come as its still a loss making company which appears to me to be runing around in circles and paying propbably over the odds for Snack Attack, a complete chain of outlets Worthigton could have bought for a song not that long ago.
I was a member here for years before I posted---thats right years, I just read the posts and picked up what I could, an yes made some little money out of the market.
We all have our different ways of doing things, I happen to follow WB principles.
I dont agree with TA, as I do not agree with crystal balls, and witchcraft, I believe in solid fundamentals and these tell you to go on past performance and solid accounts. ie concret laying.
I dont believe that you can forecast share performance as there are so many imponderables moving in on the equations daily if not hourly.
Although that said I appreciate the work cyinic and PTH put into thier craft.
Since forecasting the COH drop its got very personal---to me I dont mind as infantiles usual cry when they toys are taken away, as do bullies when they cant get their own way.
No problem for me, none what so ever.
I now see that beemer says COH has a dossiers on me, mmmhhh reminds me of the good old days of the Cold War.
Yes I am highly critical of Richard Worthington, and yes I think things are not as they should be at COH---but I say so here and out in the open.
You see I have nothing to hide and I would now very much like to see the COH dossier on me, if in fact there is one.
Under the Freedon of Information Act I am entitle to see any files etc,etc
But let me make it easy all round, for if Mr Worhtigton has been telling his sychopants tales out of school, which beemer sems to imply, then that to is further misconduct for a CEO.
So my message is cklear to Mr Worthingtom and co, if indeed as your shareholder beemer claims you have a dossier on me for simply publicly opposiing your COH and BKE business methods, then why not do as I do and publish what you have here, right here, ! right now, today and lets clear the air!
You can rest assured of two things, with the recent events in COH leave more questions unanswerd than answered and I will keep seeking the truth.
Furthermore if you are man enough to publish this alledged dossier that your appear to happy to informMr beemer that you have, may I respectfully suggest that kindly ensure that when you put it here its all cortect and true as there are some very stringent libel laws.
And more importantly, if as you claim you know me then obviously you will be aware that I have just won two libel cases, and settle one in my favour out of court, and very lucrative ideed they were! People only "thinking" they knew what they were talking about as opposed to knowing.
You see fans what ever and when ever I will always seek out and go for the truth over everything else.
Like what some of you say here I am COH bashing or WNG bashing---that not quite so///there is nothing in it for me.
I just happen to feel that financial BBs are not all about a vested interests ramping of owned shares.
Financial BBs should be about educating and enlightening, freely, honestly and openly.
I was party to the WIGGINS debacle I dont want to see that again in any shape of form.
I am so crital f the FSA they should have prosicted Tom Winnifirth for the Oliver Inny interviews which gave by chance of design, I really do know, the sentiments that things were right with Wiggins. They were not Wiggins went bust taking shareholders fund with it many life saving went to the wall.
Also your tax monies went in the form of EU grants that Wiggins direwctor falsely in my opion cliamed fro the the EU RDFs.
I made severel protestations to the various EU departments and MEPs involved in giving WIGGINS you loot, and not one did a darned thing, they were happy to lose the grant money which went to the wall with WIGGINS, as of course the tax payers were paying.
HOWEVER WHEN WE STOP LOOK FOR "FAIR PLAY" WE MAY AS WELL JUST STOP!
If you want to ban me then ban me(stating why) if not I will be back tomorrow looking for more answers on the COH/Snack Attack tie up---opps no not tomorow got a lunch meeting with with a finance director of one of my companies that I invest in.
But over the weekend.
Have a really good night and I trust you all sleep as soundly as I.
beemer2
- 12 Jul 2007 22:45
- 1803 of 2037
"won two libel cases"...LOL.
IAN...PLEASE REMOVE HIM, FOR EVERYBODY'S SAKE.
David10B
- 12 Jul 2007 22:50
- 1804 of 2037
as said beemer enough is enough put your money where your mouth is if you have any that is.
Your only concern is your investment in COH and sod everyone else.
Dil
- 12 Jul 2007 23:18
- 1805 of 2037
Double top ... 36p next stop.
Abandon ship.
ptholden
- 13 Jul 2007 00:33
- 1806 of 2037
Dil I agree, but probably a bit lower.
COH TA
cynic
- 13 Jul 2007 08:22
- 1807 of 2037
my simple mind would tend to agree with Dil (36), though i also understand PT's logic (34) ..... for all that, given that there is (at least) a notional spread of 1p, there is not a huge amount to be made on a bear tack - barely (sorry!) 10%
David10B
- 13 Jul 2007 17:13
- 1808 of 2037
Good afternoon all, seems my sentiments on COH have gathered some support here at last.
It also goes to show just how far people will go to protect, through unwarrnanted ramping and plain rudeness, to make their pets share appear to be worth more than they are not.
They want you to invest your hard earned cash in thier mistakes.
They pump the share up, and you foolishly get in on the hype, as did so many of you unfortunate punters with COH at 50p, then you find they have sold as so many COH holders have, "top slicing" they call it, but its just a fancy name for thier capital preservation, while you rmain stuck in at perhaps never to be seem again ramped up prices----there is only one losser, and lad that be you!
Why do you think COH holders want to get me banned form posting my views on this loss maker!
Please note it is only I that have stated COH makes losses still, and only I who have ask this BB to correct me if I am wrong.---none have!
Look after your pocket, as if you dont there are plentry wanting to get in there.
Its been a long painful slog in getting your kind acceptance that the SP of COH was not sustainable over 40p.
But for those who followed my persistance you should now have sold and trustfully be in pocket.
Then if you still like COH you will at least be able (possibly) to buy back in at around 30p or even below as its still a loss making company after all these years, well according to my interpretation of the latest Numis Note it is, and as no one here has disputed my findings, despite several requsts to do so, then it must be so.
Please have a reallly nice weekend, as jolly good show----the weather looks promising enough.
beemer2
- 13 Jul 2007 17:19
- 1809 of 2037
IF YOU HAD A BRAIN YOU WOULD BE LETHAL...LOL.
David10B
- 13 Jul 2007 17:25
- 1810 of 2037
Imagine I have called COH dead right, without one all along, so for once you must be right.
beemer2
- 13 Jul 2007 17:27
- 1811 of 2037
You have been calling COH wrong since you jumped at 18p...LOL.
ptholden
- 13 Jul 2007 17:29
- 1812 of 2037
Let's keep the record straight, I don't like my comments being distorted to support the ramblings of an obsessive poster. I have offered some TA on COH for whatever value it may be worth, I have not stated at any time that the SP of COH is unsustainable over 40p. In the short term I am expecting a slide and quite frankly following the failure to break through the low 40s, you didn't need to be a rocket scientist to come to the same conclusion. In the med to long term the TA picture may well be different, but I have given an honest opinion, don't drag me into your obsession Thrush, my overall sentiment re COH is very different to your own, you will get no support from me.
pth
David10B
- 13 Jul 2007 17:33
- 1813 of 2037
MY DEAR LITTLE CHAPPIE, JUST ABOVE YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT BRAINS ETC. KINDLY SWITCH YOUR TO FUNCTION MODE AND PLEASE PAY ATTENTION AS JUDGING BY YOUR LASTEST POST YOU COULD HAVE ADS, BUT DONT WORRY IT IS TREATABLE IF THAT THE CASE.
SO NOW ARE YOU SITTING COMFORATABEL? YES THEN I WILL BEGIN.
I HAVE NEVER OWNED COH.
BUT ASSUME THAT I DID AND I SOLD AT 18P OK?
WELL GIVEN THE CURRENT UNCERTAINTY OVER THIS SHARE I WOULD BE VERY HAPPY WITH A BIRD IN HAND OVER TWO IN THE BUSH.
You too could be sitting on less than 19p and over night, if I think what could be coming does indeed come.
MY OFFER FOR MANCHESTER STILL STANDS, PLEASE COME YOU WILL LEARN EVER SO MUCH.
David10B
- 13 Jul 2007 17:44
- 1814 of 2037
COME COME MY DEAR PTHY I never made such a direct inference to you or indeed anyone else, besides I want all the credit myself.
Please kindly allow me to explain in order to make it easier for you to grasp.
I was me, who in May, I belive, that said COH would fall and as I had calculted it indeed did fall. ( but then I would not unreservedly say anyting that I was unsure off as it may mislead others.)
Since that time, consideringly all the rude insults from the status quo, I respectfully asked for your opinion. You in turn kindly gave it.
As it turned out it was, whether intentional or not, supportive of my original call.
Hense I am fully justified to proclaim---------
David10B - 13 Jul 2007 17:13 - 1808 of 1813
Good afternoon all, seems my sentiments on COH have gathered some support here at last.
Thats the way the cookie crumbled this time, so please try to accept the situation with a dignity that most men of character and substance would inevitably do.
beemer2
- 13 Jul 2007 17:57
- 1815 of 2037
DAVIS...HOW OLD WERE YOU WHEN YOU STARTED TO SHOW SIGNS THAT YOU WERE BECOMMING A MUPPET.
ptholden
- 13 Jul 2007 17:59
- 1816 of 2037
Thrush, you really are an arse. I look forward to the day when AM have finally had enough of you and launch you back into hyper-space. Anyway, no further repsonses from me, you just aint worth the trouble. Ta-Ta my dear chap.
David10B
- 13 Jul 2007 18:08
- 1817 of 2037
This is the type of totally irresponsible posting that we must all try to erradicate from financial BBs, which I suggest should be very heavily regulated against uninformed blatant rampings.
TAKE A LOOK AT THIS FROM ADVFN(with fully acknowledgement thereto)_
donaferentes - 5 Jul'07 - 11:03 - 6159 of 6174
Nice little handle to the tea-cup being formed before we break up past 42.5p on the way to attacking 50p again......................
Some one seems to have forgotten which was is up!
But seriously I wonder how many people bought on that silly post and similar pne ,as there are loads of them about!
Buying of COH over the month has in fact been quite strong, as the inexperinced thought is was cheap below 50p as the rampers proclaimed it was, and of course l manyo fthese are locked in at July 4th prices ie 42p
Now if these start panic selling to cut their losses, the effect will open the floor!
One to think about over the weekend no doubt!
David10B
- 13 Jul 2007 18:15
- 1818 of 2037
Gentlemen I really dont mind the insults.
Insults are usually a sign of anger.
Anger of frustration.
Frustration of annoyance.
And Annoyance is one of the signs of being spoilt and unable to get one's way.
Signs, or perhaps symptoms is the better word, such as these commonly disapear with maturity in most, however there is medication available on prescription.
Please try to have a nice relaxing weekend. Radio 4 is very theraputic.