moderator3
- 05 Nov 2003 01:28
- 18 of 55
Done for you, Ian is on annual leave.
goldfinger
- 05 Nov 2003 03:06
- 20 of 55
LW have a good nights sleep.
regards Gf.
ps, many thanks for the advise on the title changing, thinka lot more want a pre xmas shake up, what say you?????,
Haystack
- 05 Nov 2003 22:34
- 22 of 55
Personally I prefer several threads on the same epic codes. There are often reasons for starting new threads with different titles as circumstances change. I have never found it a problem. If you find it a problem then you can always search for threads by epic code. I will not be one who keeps to a single thread per stock as I actually prefer the mutiplicity of threads with different variations on a theme. It really is not necessary to try and impose a regime on what is a pretty free form medium.
Andy
- 07 Nov 2003 13:49
- 26 of 55
juzzle,
Fair point, and a good idea.
I do agree with Haystack's and others' point that different people's perspective of a stck may be different, and therefore thay would want to title the thread differently.
However, Little Woman is right, some people are opening many threads for the same stock, and duplicating posts.
Maybe someone should review new thresds. and delete any that apear to be duplicated of others?
There has to be way of doing this that will allow freedom of speech, but eliminate the dross!
Haystack
- 07 Nov 2003 15:03
- 27 of 55
A simple reminder by the system when adding a new thread could be used. It could through up the current list of thread titles for that stock and the last date posted to them. It could offer a choice of adding to one of those or starting a new thread, which must always be available as the topic may be different.
goldfinger
- 07 Nov 2003 16:24
- 30 of 55
I think we need to keep the thread tittles up to date thus reflecting the stocks present status in the market. I had no problems contacting admin like you suggested Little Woman in fact they seem to be a nice group of people.
Anyway going to my favourite epic - PUB.
Wish everybody a good weekend, COME ON ENGLAND, sorry if you are Welsh.
cheers GF.
ajren
- 20 Nov 2003 10:37
- 33 of 55
Hi lw.
Too many with very little history.History is History.
The Stock Market exists in 1 second of time so - just an opinion - readers
want the very LATEST info e.g.I have just posted The mutualnet info of Nov 19
i.e.Schewo = 284,213,728 shares = 7.258 per cent of company.ALREADY that is
out of date i.e.history as the price now reflects that info.
Also,the traders tread constantly needs updating as the latest treads do not-
often - show the LATEST info so in effect they are History.
I would like readers of this post to add to it and say what they want.
rgds aj
ajren
- 20 Nov 2003 11:02
- 35 of 55
First sentence :- I seem to be doing a lot of posting but with info that is
the very latest.
The traders tread usually does not have the Latest info so much of it is
Historical
I completely agree with your last sentence.
I hope we have a lot of Postings here on this tread so readers will then know
what people want e.g.History/The Latest rgds aj
Fundamentalist
- 20 Nov 2003 11:16
- 36 of 55
Personally I am with Little Woman on this. I would prefer fewer threads with the history on them and a specific thread daily for short term info. As a longer term investor it is interesting to go back and evaluate historical news and people's reactions to it and then compare it to the effect on the share price. This helps to understand how a company's share price reacts to certain news as a guide to future performance. It is also helpful to compare shares, for example when people post is company "a" the next company "b", it is then helpful to go and read the history on company "b". I also think that each thread should be kept as specific to one share as possible, rather than several different shares being discussed on one thread, as happens, can lead to some confusion
ajren
- 20 Nov 2003 11:43
- 37 of 55
Thanks for post.I hope we get many more posts.aj