Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Petrol Resources 29p to 435 by mid summer (PET)     

chartist2004 - 15 Apr 2004 12:02

The tiny Irish stock on the brink of landing 'the first' post-sanction oil deal in Iraq. Ref 'Fleet Street Letter' 12-04-04..

gra1969 - 17 Dec 2004 14:50 - 1814 of 2700

Tokyo and Seawallwalker; Have found this rumour circulating too! If so a retraction will be issued over the weekend.

gra1969 - 17 Dec 2004 14:53 - 1815 of 2700

Also odd that nothing appears on Iraq Procurement web site they have been releasing contract news on there as it happens!

seawallwalker - 17 Dec 2004 14:54 - 1816 of 2700

Got it...........

toedipper05 - 17 Dec'04 - 12:49 - 4043 of 4265


FLASH - A mate who works in the business here in Ireland says that there is the POSSIBILITY that Reuters are preparing to withdraw the article and apologise to Petrel. Supposedly a joint pr is being drawn up and will be released today before close of business.

All maybe's and but's at the moment, nothing definite but looking positive. Don't leave your pc screens.

gra1969 - 17 Dec 2004 14:56 - 1817 of 2700

Posted on other side!!!!!!!!


If you go to msn search and enter the authors name khaled yacouk oweis at the top of the page you will see a link to the reuters article.When you click on the link http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=reutersEdge&storyID=6035403 you will see that the story has been removed.Please could someone check this out and report back.

seawallwalker - 17 Dec 2004 14:57 - 1818 of 2700

http://www.reuters.com/newsSearchResultsHome.jhtml;jsessionid=KBOLBBJAK54KGCRBAE0CFFA?query=pet.l&qtype=a&x=10&y=8

Only the initial one, not the updates.

gra1969 - 17 Dec 2004 15:05 - 1819 of 2700

thanks for checking sww.

watcher - 17 Dec 2004 15:10 - 1820 of 2700

what an awesome situation ziblot is in now...... to make if the story is false would be brill for him.. got me dosh ready and braced for impact..
PET must be fuming, having done the right thing by remaining silent as requested

watcher

iturama - 17 Dec 2004 15:11 - 1821 of 2700

I suppose if the report is wrong, its wrong period. But if its correct, except for the names, how can PET's valuation at a 1 or more be justified? These are not big construction contracts by any stretch of the imagination. The Dome cost more than the two contracts put together. The upside can only come from a production sharing agreement.

dexter01 - 17 Dec 2004 15:20 - 1822 of 2700

just got this reply from DH,



It is the weekend in Baghdad (begins 12.00 local time on Thursday).
The head of SCOP is in Syria.
We were sworn to secrecy until the tenders were announced. A Ministry
official was shot in September allegedly for 'being too close to the
Americans'. They are sensitive - and understandably so. I am only
responding to you in the light of the Reuters report.


There has been no notification of any decision, either way.

The third of the tenders (the largest project: Subba & Luhais) was
submitted only on Wednesday 15th Dec.

We cannot influence what Reuters - or any other media group say. I did
notice that a later report quoted the Deputy Minister of Oil denied
that an award had been made. Also, the Canadian group mentioned denied
any involvement.

We push on with our work: we bid a technically excellent package - but
fully costed and with a margin that if successful will be attractive to
shareholder. Why take a service contract on any other basis.



In the meantime we push on with our exploration work.



Markets over-react to recent events - good or bad. We have made
considerable progress this past year and are now an accepted player in Iraqi
oil developments.



We will push on as vigorously as possible constrained only by the
discipline of an attractive risk-adjusted return. You shouldn't expect
anything else!



David Horgan

MD

kellman - 17 Dec 2004 15:23 - 1823 of 2700

I still can`t believe what I am reading on here, if there was any doubt about the story, dealing in PET shares would have been suspended straight away until the situation is clarified imho.

gra1969 - 17 Dec 2004 15:25 - 1824 of 2700

Check out OASIS, The other side believe that these could be in the running, confused with Ironhorse!

dexter01 - 17 Dec 2004 15:29 - 1825 of 2700

gra1969,
oasis website please,
dexter

sandrew64 - 17 Dec 2004 15:30 - 1826 of 2700

Has anyone contacted OIG to see if they have tendered for 'our' contracts?

gra1969 - 17 Dec 2004 15:36 - 1827 of 2700

Dexter www.ogigroup.com

Beasties - 17 Dec 2004 15:36 - 1828 of 2700

Sandrew, just e-mailed them. Dunno when they open in the mornin tho.

ziblot - 17 Dec 2004 15:37 - 1829 of 2700

If you honestly believe a Reuters retraction the pressure has got to you.

gra1969 - 17 Dec 2004 15:39 - 1830 of 2700

They have offices in Canada, Iraq, Jordan, Yemen! Cnat get anything else yet.

sandrew64 - 17 Dec 2004 15:40 - 1831 of 2700

Thanks Beasties...I think Calgary might be 8hrs behind us.

iturama - 17 Dec 2004 15:40 - 1832 of 2700

Sorry to keep getting back to reality, but the other important question to ask DH is whether there is any error in the scope of work of the contracts, as reported. If there is not, then Pet maybe fairly priced now, even if it gets all three contracts. The new Wembley Stadium is costing 3 times more.

travis - 17 Dec 2004 15:52 - 1833 of 2700

Maybe all you have to do is email this guy and ask him the question. Mohamed.Messaoudi@ogigroup.com
Register now or login to post to this thread.