moneyplus
- 27 Jun 2005 18:57
This one hit the markets running today. Despite negative publicity it was well supported so I jumped in for a small holding--anyone else joining in?? I am hoping for a good run up before the shorters get going.
cynic
- 05 Oct 2006 21:17
- 182 of 346
PRTY may not yet be dead, but why stay around until the vultures arrive?
Bones
- 05 Oct 2006 21:59
- 183 of 346
you are a cynic, Cynic!
cynic
- 05 Oct 2006 22:04
- 184 of 346
but is it not a fair observation?
HARRYCAT
- 05 Oct 2006 22:16
- 185 of 346
Spot on for those not trapped in. Difficult to bear for those still holding.
AndrewThomson77
- 05 Oct 2006 22:17
- 186 of 346
On Working Lunch yesterday (wednesday), they gave PRTY a fair value of around 25p.
I don't hold this share.
seawallwalker
- 05 Oct 2006 22:21
- 187 of 346
A born cynic.
Thank goodness for that!
Bones
- 06 Oct 2006 00:31
- 188 of 346
I'm commenting because I am interested to hear the "outsider's" viewpoint. By that I mean someone who maybe doesn't use the poker software. I play there occasionally and know the industry quite well, but have never owned any gaming shares including PRTY.
IMO Party will be aggressive with the rest of the world market and will make good money. However, the current share price is probably fair allowing even for that growth potential (ex-USA).
By the way, HTC, no-one is "trapped" in the share. They can sell and take the loss! Be glad it's a highly traded liquid share :)
alanatml2
- 06 Oct 2006 07:42
- 189 of 346
It would seem that infringements of civil liberties are imposed by the republican Party in stopping gamblers transferring their funds through existing banking systems. Test cases by individuals against their banks will bedevil the new legislation for years. We await legal actions commencing as acts of gambling are NOT illegal at the point of sale. Transferring funds is NOT illegal at the point of contact between punter and bank.
stockbunny
- 06 Oct 2006 08:34
- 190 of 346
Yes it will be the enforcement of the law which will prove a very big headache and if you have a comitted gambler who has reasonable assets, there are several tax havens outside US legislation offshore that could be used as middle a/cs - how can you stop funds passing from one a/c to another if they are both banks? The purpose of the funds once their dock outside the US are a different matter. If people want to get round this they will - look at prohibition, did it stop booze?
rpaco
- 06 Oct 2006 12:22
- 191 of 346
Harrycat
No I'v lost enought spread betting, I loose it in different ways now. I am waiting to see the bottom, of PRTY well to try and guess wher it is and then to buy SE38 SG Covered warrant. Unfortunately they dont do a Put warrant on PRTY. At least you can only loose what you put in, on any deal with CWs though the various parameters that decide the price do erode the value on a time basis.
rpaco
- 06 Oct 2006 12:26
- 192 of 346
On working lunch last week it was said 75% from USA not 85% hence my 28p guess. Have you studied the accounts? Though of course accounts can be made to look like anything you want.
I have about 6 different ways of determining the bottom but they all suffer from the same fault.
rpaco
- 06 Oct 2006 12:27
- 193 of 346
Off to watch working lunch now. cheers!
HARRYCAT
- 06 Oct 2006 22:03
- 194 of 346
rpaco - I have seen figures of anything between 75% - 90% of PRTY exposure to the U.S., so it's difficult to make an accurate judgement. I would tend to assume a worst case scenario and work on 90%.
I would also be very tempted to just sit & watch for a while as far as PRTY is concerned. There are other safer stocks out there, even in the gaming sector.
PapalPower
- 07 Oct 2006 07:16
- 195 of 346
PapalPower
- 07 Oct 2006 11:57
- 196 of 346
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=FT&Date=20061006&ID=6084392
According to Jonathan M. Winer, a Washington attorney at Alston & Bird LLP who has closely monitored the WTO action, the legislation could well exacerbate the problems the US has already has with the WTO.
"To the extent that the legislation eliminates foreign competition for activities that remain lawful in the U.S., such as online betting on state-licensed horseracing, or state-licensed casino gambling that meets federal guidelines, there's no doubt it raises WTO issues," he said.
PapalPower
- 07 Oct 2006 18:06
- 197 of 346
cynic
- 07 Oct 2006 20:00
- 198 of 346
PP .... the Washington attornies and everyone may ultimately prove that the US "is breaking the law", but it is likely to be a long time coming to court and of course much longer until there is a definitve result and all appeals finished .... in the meantime, many of these internet gambling companies will be long finished
janetbennison
- 08 Oct 2006 08:13
- 199 of 346
looks like the buyers in us are looking to take over online gaming business in the us. There could be quite a lot of action over the next few weeks. Look at the news in sunday times online out today. sportingbet have been approached by quite a few companies. If the gaming companies get taken over in us. Then the new rules and regulations with not affect us. Time for a cup of tea. Have a nice sunday everyone.
janetbennison
- 08 Oct 2006 15:09
- 200 of 346
news just come out 2.45 uk government draws up plans for online betting report.