bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
greekman
- 04 Aug 2006 08:34
- 18463 of 27111
Just heard on BBC News that the environmental Lobby is putting even more pressure on Supermarkets to cut waste.
Due to this Tesco have just announced that they will offer a reward program to shoppers who re-use their plastic carrier bags.
The latest figures show we use 8 billion such bags per year in this country alone.
Be nice if all supermarket go even further into the environmental trend and go for as many biodegradable products as possible. This should please the lobbyists even more. SEO products of course.
hewittalan6
- 04 Aug 2006 09:04
- 18464 of 27111
Following the lead of others, i have just e-mailed Asda. the mail is simply a load of old baloney about my commitment to green issues and asking why, if they are committed to reducing packaging waste they have not introduced biodegradable packaging, or if they intend to do so.
No product names, no clue that my interest is any other than green. Just wondering if the reply will let slip a hint or two.
I will let you all know.
Alan
Oilywag
- 04 Aug 2006 09:18
- 18465 of 27111
Alan
ex MI5?
No, can't be. Your sense of humour is too good, you little pianist you!
The oily one
hewittalan6
- 04 Aug 2006 09:19
- 18466 of 27111
No Oily,
Ex MFI.
Can't hold a screw for more than a few seconds and I tend to fall to bits inside a week.
Oilywag
- 04 Aug 2006 09:34
- 18467 of 27111
Anybody help me out here. I have Interactive Investor's level 1 real time streaming.
Between 8.44 and 8.48 there were 13 trades totalling around 457,000 shares, the majority being buys. And no trade since then according to Interactive.
I know that SEO's share price is now on the SETS system, but are these trades held up so that MM can manipulate the price?
The oily one
hewittalan6
- 04 Aug 2006 09:38
- 18468 of 27111
Don't know the answer directly, and I don't know the mechanism, but even a casual glance at yesterdays trading showed what looked like manipulation. The buy price rose every few seconds to 5.2p only to be immediately dropped to 5p.
Today, the spread was 1% or less until after those trades you mention and then suddenly rose to 5% plus.
i accept that an automated system can produce these results, but it all seems a little convenient for the traders.
The question I ask myself is not how, but why?
Alan
Oilywag
- 04 Aug 2006 09:42
- 18469 of 27111
Mmmm.....
Seems like manipulation to me as well Alan
Just seen 400K bought - no sells - in about three minutes and the price drops by .14p.
There's nowt as queer as the market!
Makes you wonder how safe it is to put a limit price on your trades!
The oily one
aldwickk
- 04 Aug 2006 10:20
- 18470 of 27111
1,404,860 sold after the close yesterday showing as the first trade this morning.
hewittalan6
- 04 Aug 2006 10:24
- 18471 of 27111
The price for almost all of yesterday was in the region of 4.95 - 5.00, so whether it was a buy or sell, we will probably never know.
The figure suggests buy, but the way the sp dropped immediately back to 5p the moment anyone tried to raise the ante suggests a sell.
Who knows. Yesterdays news now.
Alan
garyble
- 04 Aug 2006 10:30
- 18472 of 27111
Back to an earlier question re: Starpol 3000 FDA approval. It took 125 days for the announcement of FDA approval of Starpol 2000 from the earlier announcement stating it had European approval and fruit & veg in the USA {Starpol 2000: 12th Oct '05 to 14th Feb '06, [125 days]. Starpol 3000: 2nd May '06 AGM statement to ???}. So by simple reasoning, I'd say we'd need to count at least 120 days from the Starpol 3000 announcement, which would take us to September.
Mad Pad
- 04 Aug 2006 10:44
- 18473 of 27111
garyble ,the AGM statement says quite clearly with regard to the FDA approval of starpol 3000"...we expect approval ....for this within weeks".The date of the statement was 2May 2006(page 1 penultimate paragraph).It's now months and we have had no announcement either way that is why I asked Oily to pose the question .
kimoldfield
- 04 Aug 2006 11:15
- 18474 of 27111
12 inch pianist!! :o)). I just can't stop laughing Alan!
kim
Oilywag
- 04 Aug 2006 11:28
- 18475 of 27111
Kim,
For God's sake don't encourage him. He'll only go on and on and think up some more.
Mind you, I think he copies them out of a joke book, myself.
The oily one
garyble
- 04 Aug 2006 11:29
- 18476 of 27111
Mad Pad,
I make the assumption that it is down to one of two things:
1) SEO speak... weeks gives a better expectation than months
2) Continued naivety wrt to timescales
In any event, worst case is, it can be no longer than the Starpol 2000 timeframe, taking the AGM statement as a start point.
kimoldfield
- 04 Aug 2006 11:49
- 18479 of 27111
I'm not going to get any work done if this carries on! Oblo, I think it is Alan watching, and by the looks of it he is practising for Clerkenwell (see the NOWT thread!!)
kim
Edit
Oilywag
- 04 Aug 2006 11:54
- 18480 of 27111
soul traders
Look at the picture carefully. Judging by the pianist's reach, it seems that he has very large organ!
The oily one
greekman
- 04 Aug 2006 12:02
- 18481 of 27111
Oilywag,
Like you checked trades, they show the same, a gap between 0848 and 0930.
Does seam unusual for SEO these days. Most of the trades prior to this look to have been triggered by the Sets system so if no shares marrying up so to speak buys/sells it could account for it. It may also be that punters are sitting on their hands awaiting news, as there is also a similar gap between 0942 and 1027.