rather than pick out individual stocks to trade, it can often be worthwhile to trade the indices themselves, especially in times of high volatility.

for those so inclined, i attach below charts for FTSE and FTSE 250, though one might equally be tempted to trade Dow or S&P, which is significantly broader in its coverage, or even NASDAQ

for ease of reading, i have attached 1 year and 3 month charts in each instance

More large moves. Not ventured back in yet.

no jimmy, i prudently but, as it happens wrongly, closed that very small long just before lights out with a 20 point loss

FTSE
at 6075 or thereabouts, a bounce from here is a reasonable view
however, such is the chaotic and pretty bearish mood of the markets in general, that great care is needed

bollocks .... i was otherwise occupied and missed a golden opportunity

.

all rocketing away BUT FTSE currently baulking at the important 6200 level

Wonder if you'v not missed the boat today ?

possibly, but i rarely trade FTSE
am currently back in DOW long

exited dow last night with paltry profit - got too greedy - but thankful that i did

meanwhile
FTSE looking very shaky as 6100 is now being challenged south
the brave may want to dip a toe

Markets are mad a pure gamble now days ,however when you see the FTSE / DOW get hammered it seems to be worth going long ,i did FTSE at 5998 the other night ,so i'm only in if they look oversold .
Stock trades now looking to nick a few points here and there.

and conversely jimmy, don't you fancy going short when they rise sharply, or is it that you think they are generally too low and it's less of a gamble going long?
I must say, I have been doing similarly and tending to go long after big drops but I have had a few successful shorts as well - very easy to get whipsawed though!!

Yes splat that's exactly my thinking with the FTSE ,at some point it will just carry on up and it will be at what point do you close a short .
Plus i shouldn't try and be too clever with indices they usually come back and bite me ,just try and trade what looks like the obvious .

Mayhem alert !!!!!!!

yet another stomach-churning weeks draws to a close
FTSE has held up over 6,000 which is certainly good news
meanwhile DOW is just about holding above 16,100 which is neither here nor there as 16,000 is much more important

Didn't fancy being long over the weekend ,however could be good for a bounce next week .

actually the key number for FTSE was 6100, so not quite as sanguine as i was
i don't hold

would feel cheerier if DOW shunts (significantly) north rather than even further south before closing

Why ? let it tank then you just know the bounce is coming ..

Anything below 6000 on the FTSE and i'm tempted .

you may get your wish the way things are heading at the moment
one of the major probs, is that even if you are glued to the screen, judging direction is currently very difficult indeed

.

For those with a few minutes to spare over the w/e, this is a view from the FT concerning the market volatility:
The last week of August was one of the most volatile we have seen in global equity markets for several years. The fear that had been building hit the markets with a jolt on Monday 24 August. The warning lights had been flashing for several months but developed equity markets, with the complacency of a boiling frog, had appeared unconcerned by the worrying developments in other asset classes.

Clearly, there were fundamental triggers for the market declines but, in our view, the market moves were exacerbated by flow considerations and market technicals. So, what happened?

What caused the US market to lurch lower so violently and then recover? How could a stock like GE, for example, a $250bn company, fall as much as -21% in the first few minutes of trading and then recover to close the day down less than -3%? Apple, the world’s biggest stock, ‘lost’ $79bn worth of value at the market open but had recovered it all within an hour (by the way, that is broadly equivalent to the entire market cap of AstraZeneca).

First, let’s recap on the fundamental triggers.
Commodity prices had been weak for some time, initially on supply developments but more recent moves lower have been demand driven, signalling a deteriorating global growth outlook, especially in China. Fears about the world’s second largest economy in recent months had spilled over into emerging market currencies, their equities and in to the high yield debt market.

At the same time, the Chinese stock market had become completely detached from the reality of its underlying economy. The fall from its peak in June has been spectacular – in less than 10 weeks, the value of mainland China equities broadly halved, wiping out more than the total capitalisation of the UK stock market in the process.

Equities were in the eye of the storm on Monday 24 August after experiencing sharp sell-offs on the previous Friday, when poor China PMI data was followed by weaker than expected US PMI data that afternoon. The weekend press that followed focused on the sell-off and potential implications. “Global stocks suffer rout as fears intensify over Chinese slowdown” was the Financial Times front page on the Saturday.

When Asian markets opened on Monday 24, Chinese equities were hit very hard and closed the day down -8.5%. The falls in China triggered a sell-off in international markets as fear spread across the globe. The moves were extraordinary and have raised a lot of questions about how modern markets function in such volatile conditions. The FTSE was down -6.8% at its low, which coincided with the US market opening on the Monday, but ended the week in positive territory. All European markets experienced similar sell-offs.

Watching the screens at first hand, reading the flood of news on the wires and in talking to fellow traders in the industry, there are suggestions that other forces, besides fundamentals, are at work. Heavy selling pressure in equity futures ahead of the US open certainly played a role in these moves but another significant reason for the market instability and volatility could be trading activity in exchange traded funds (ETFs).

For instance, in the first few minutes of trading, the $5.8bn Vanguard Health Care ETF fell -32% but the value of the underlying holdings fell only -6%. The trading of the PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio ETF was also somewhat ironic. According to its description, “the fund seeks results that correspond generally to the price and yield of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index.” In the first 15 minutes of trading, it fell over -45% but within an hour it was down only -2.6%.

Ironically, ETFs were, in part, originally designed to satisfy the demand for an intraday trading option from private investors that wanted to trade more frequently than a daily-pricing fund could allow. Clearly they have an important role to play for some investors but it appears their success has brought some unwanted side-effects.

For now, ETFs are a much more powerful force in the US market than they are in the UK. However, their emergence may suggest that we could face greater volatility going forward. More reasons to think long-term, therefore, and to focus on fundamentals, not flow.