Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

TANKER - 18 Oct 2012 12:04 - 18696 of 81564

DAVID ROSE must be banned and never ware a england shirt again he was the person that started the fighting he was a disgrace.

Haystack - 18 Oct 2012 12:32 - 18697 of 81564

You must have watched a different match.

TANKER - 18 Oct 2012 13:00 - 18698 of 81564

Ihave watched and listened to all concerned he was the
person at fault . all was well till he went to the serb fans
and he was out of order big time ban him for life .

Stan - 18 Oct 2012 13:29 - 18699 of 81564

Christian nutters lose court case http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-19991266

greekman - 18 Oct 2012 13:44 - 18700 of 81564

Whether you agree with what the couple did or not, the ruling statement is ridiculous.

On one hand the recorder stated that by refusing the couple access to a double room, Mrs Wilkinson had "treated them less favourably than she would treat unmarried heterosexual couples in the same circumstances".

On the other hand she stated that she accepted that Mrs Wilkinson was genuine about her Christian beliefs and had also stopped unmarried heterosexual couples from sharing a double bed.

So how could the couple have done both!

Fred1new - 18 Oct 2012 14:40 - 18701 of 81564

Personally, I think in cases such as this, that a person/s should have the right to provide or not to provide services as they see fit.

The "accommodation" could not drag individuals off the street into their accommodation and expect them to pay for utilising it.

I think the reverse is equally valid.

If they think homosexuality to be offensive, so be it.

If they prefer 3 in a bed so be it.

These are personal choices of "morality" or "beliefs".

TANKER - 18 Oct 2012 15:04 - 18702 of 81564

yes fred you are correct . I would never allow them in my home .
and will avoid them at all times . sodom comes to mind .

Stan - 18 Oct 2012 15:44 - 18703 of 81564

I don't care much what other people think or don't think on the subject but if people are going to offer a service to the public then they should consider that people are free to conduct themselves in what way they like in "their" bedroom within reason.

When I say "their" bedroom I mean that it's their bedroom because they have rented it for a period of time.

Fred1new - 18 Oct 2012 17:52 - 18704 of 81564

Stan,

The only weakness I see is that there appeared to be a contract to put them up.

I believe in general that contracts should be held to.

But if I had a group of paedophiles wishing to use my premises, I would object even if the likely acts became legal.

I think both side have a right to their own morality but not to impose it on others.

-------------------


Believe I asked a few days ago, which policies would the government U-turn on first.

Didn't think Captain outrageous and Sargent Droop would have caved in so quickly.


They continue on the "Idiots Progress" with increasing signs of immaturity and ill thought out ideas of 6th form debaters.

They would be laughed out of the Cambridge University Debates Society.

What a naive group.

Mind good to see Cameron telling the EU what the "SHOULD DO"..




dreamcatcher - 18 Oct 2012 20:26 - 18705 of 81564

Fred1new - 18 Oct 2012 22:07 - 18706 of 81564

I can see it is past your bed times.

Take Georgie and Davy with you they need to sleep.

skinny - 19 Oct 2012 06:44 - 18707 of 81564

Sylvia Kristel, star of Emmanuelle, dies

Dutch actress Sylvia Kristel, who starred in the 1974 erotic French film Emmanuelle, has died aged 60.

"She died during the night during her sleep," her agent, Marieke Verharen, told the AFP news agency.

Stan - 19 Oct 2012 06:53 - 18708 of 81564

The usual suspects now trying to get publicity out of the B+B story.

skinny - 19 Oct 2012 07:42 - 18709 of 81564

You don't say!

UK experiences 'weirdest' weather

The UK has experienced its "weirdest" weather on record in the past few months, scientists say.

The driest spring for over a century gave way to the wettest recorded April to June in a dramatic turnaround never documented before.

The scientists said there was no evidence that the weather changes were a result of Man-made climate change.

But experts from three bodies warned the UK must plan for periodic swings of drought conditions and flooding.

TANKER - 19 Oct 2012 08:21 - 18710 of 81564

stan freedom to do what they like in the bedroom .
and thebb owners should keep there noses out of it ,
so if I have a bb or a home I rent out I should leave them to it
leaving them to grow canabis make bombs have guns .us it as a
drug bash.
then the police blame the owner for allowing these to go on.
and this is happening loads of time and the police say the landlord
should check out these people .
and I agree owners should have the right to evict stop any one they dont want
public house the landlord can stop any one they like from going in.
stan you are wrong that is why people in the bbc have got away with crime.

Stan - 19 Oct 2012 08:40 - 18711 of 81564

Any Ex. Boxers here? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19998710

ED: Tanks, please read my post again and note the words "within reason."

TANKER - 19 Oct 2012 08:41 - 18712 of 81564

Publication of the names, which was supposed to take place on Thursday, may have exposed any MPs who were renting their homes to one another. The loophole means MPs can build up capital in property at taxpayers' expense, despite official attempts to stop the practice after the expenses scandal.

Sources at the expenses regulator said a small number of MPs rented their properties to one another.
they are stealing your money these MPs should now be charged with stealing tax payers monet this is corruption ,

hilary - 19 Oct 2012 08:54 - 18713 of 81564

Did they steal the tax payers Monet On the Bank of the Seine?

Fred1new - 19 Oct 2012 09:03 - 18714 of 81564

Tanker,

I agree with your sentiment in post 18714.

It still amazes me how corrupt politicians seem to have got away with cheap apologies over attempts to fiddle their "expenses" and yet have the gall to vilify said "benefit scroungers". Often the former spends more on a meal at the Carlton Club than the "scrounger" gets in a week.

Wisteria Dave and Andrew Mitchell seem to me, to have shown the true character the present government.


If you can get away with it, do it.

TANKER - 19 Oct 2012 09:12 - 18715 of 81564

the police need to be informed of the crime
Register now or login to post to this thread.