bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Tonyrelaxes
- 17 Aug 2006 11:12
- 18981 of 27111
As the RNS says "three months in the absence of further funding or new
revenue streams commencing in the period".
There is really nothing in the RNS and MWs statement that is new knowledge other than confirmation that Letters of Intent have been exchanged. So why look upon it differently today than yesterday? What has changed except a 15% lower purchase price?
bosley
- 17 Aug 2006 11:33
- 18982 of 27111
just a thought, tony, but i find it strange that seo have released this rns. it is very un-seo like. makes me wonder if it's something they feel forced into doing just in case they do run out of money and go belly up. at least they can then say that everyone knew the score.
WOODIE
- 17 Aug 2006 11:35
- 18983 of 27111
in response to post 18981 a timeframe on cash running out that you did not know yesterday when/if it would run out.also if you are buying more shares today dont forget the company might come to shareholders for the cash and not to the city.good luck all that hold.
oblomov
- 17 Aug 2006 11:40
- 18984 of 27111
Thanks Tony - so, taken into account already.
I cant understand why they should issue this RNS unless they are obliged to under regulatory rules, i.e. that they have to when they get to a certain point when , say, they only have enough cash for 3 months. Does anyone know?
Another possible reason maybe to let WM/ASDA/PERSECO etc. exactly what the position is and that they need to do some deals quickly or SEO will be gone.
Could it be a bargaining ploy on SEO's side?
Please note I realise I've done a complete 180 degree turn before any one points it out!
tweenie
- 17 Aug 2006 11:42
- 18985 of 27111
One MMF contract will turn this company around.
the rns has shaken the tree. (deliberatly?)
In the words of A.C. "Where large sums of money are concerned, it is advisable to trust nobody."
for me thats the board of seo. I'd say more but its all hearsay and gossip and WTFDIK anyway.
LOL otherwise i'd be crying.
greekman
- 17 Aug 2006 11:45
- 18986 of 27111
Ob,
I would think that an RNS would be required when a company reaches the point of actively seeking advice re raising of capital.
Only going by past releases by other companies.
oblomov
- 17 Aug 2006 11:46
- 18987 of 27111
There are a few AFX news items (todays date) available at the top of the SEO thread on ADVFN if anyone wants to read them - cant copy them for copywrite reasons
Tonyrelaxes
- 17 Aug 2006 11:48
- 18988 of 27111
If the Board really are as dishonest as some think, how about this one -
big deal agreed, to be signed and then announced in meantime issue this RNS to cause a drop and get in with some Directors (or mates) deals!
LOL
tweenie
- 17 Aug 2006 11:51
- 18989 of 27111
tony, not dishonest.
that implies a heart and concience.
it's about money and making money- So you pays your money and sleeps with the devil.
I expect a rights issue will only be done ,if 'partners' don't get in for a % , if you catch my drift.............
Sharesure
- 17 Aug 2006 12:06
- 18991 of 27111
I reckon SEO will arrange bank finance to cover the cash position to the calendar y/e using contracts in progress/daocumentation as a means of persuading them that this is a timing issue not a company breaking issue. Happy to sit and wait for their next announcement.
Tonyrelaxes
- 17 Aug 2006 12:21
- 18992 of 27111
Sharesure.
No support needed until after calendar y/e. 31 Oct is within their 3 months.
It is after then that they need to have pulled something together. Revenue from new deals that makes them at least cashflow neutral or raise finance from elsewhere.
If what we all read from the Company and hear elsewhere things really are about to get rolling finance should neither be a problem nor necessary.
I wholeheartedly agree with your last sentence.
Tonyrelaxes
- 17 Aug 2006 12:25
- 18993 of 27111
Sorry - confused calendar y/e with company y/e.
Rest of post stands.
greekman
- 17 Aug 2006 12:25
- 18994 of 27111
Sharesure,
We may obviously be both wrong, but I agree with you that bank finance would be the best way to go. Then there would be no automatic diluting of the share price (which would knock shareholders confidence even more) and it could either be an open ended loan, or a short term.
BKK2
- 17 Aug 2006 13:01
- 18995 of 27111
Sorry for of topic
Could someone suggest a good site for translation of Dutch to English
Thanks in advance
Peter
WOODIE
- 17 Aug 2006 13:06
- 18996 of 27111
why is the bank finance the best way to go? if take up is still slow where will the money come from to pay the loan & interest?
robinhood
- 17 Aug 2006 13:13
- 18997 of 27111
bkk2. Provided the article is not too long I will do it 4 u -(I am Dutch)
BKK2
- 17 Aug 2006 13:21
- 18998 of 27111
Robin, that is magic of you, I'm actually trying to help someone myself,Im in Bangkok at the minute and I have a girl that is trying to fill out an visa application form,if I could mail you some key words ,then maybe we could do this together
Peter
Paperbackwriter
- 17 Aug 2006 13:22
- 18999 of 27111
BKK2
I am Flemish, and speak Dutch, too.
But if you Google 'translations', it should come up with a couple of free translation sites.
robinhood,
Waar woont u? Ik ben van Antwerpen, mijn grootmoeder was Nederlands en mijn moeder woont in Amsterdam.
Zo leuk dat u Nederlands bent.
bosley
- 17 Aug 2006 13:27
- 19000 of 27111
what a truly amazing thread. just when you think you've seen everything .... :)