lex1000
- 03 Jun 2004 00:30
Excellent speculative punt sub 10p.
Chelsea1957
- 19 Jan 2005 13:15
- 19 of 84
Chelsea1957
- 19 Jan 2005 13:21
- 20 of 84
Chinapete - in answer to your question at the end of 9 of 17 this stock was tipped a week or so ago by Tom Bulford of The Red Hot Trader "expecting news from A&R exciting Mato Grosso prospect in Brazil before too long" with a short term price target of 20p
markusantonius
- 19 Jan 2005 15:19
- 21 of 84
Chinapete,
Do you have any more info. on this article, please?
queen1
- 04 Mar 2005 12:53
- 22 of 84
Up 9% today on no new news (that I can see). Would be good to end the week well into the blue.
queen1
- 23 Jun 2005 11:07
- 23 of 84
Up 12.5% today - anyone have any ideas why?
Mr Big
- 24 Jun 2005 21:57
- 24 of 84
Mr Big
- 24 Jun 2005 21:59
- 25 of 84
I believe this stock was tipped on T1ps by tom winnifrith and has recently added this stock to his personal sipp
queen1
- 24 Jun 2005 22:10
- 26 of 84
Great week this week but is there any substance behind the belief? I think so as I'm a holder but would be interested in others' opinions....
mbugger
- 26 Jun 2005 20:18
- 27 of 84
What belief, please explain queen1.
queen1
- 27 Jun 2005 13:58
- 28 of 84
mbugger, belief from investors that AGU will find what it's looking for....and in plentiful quantities.
queen1
- 13 Jan 2006 09:05
- 29 of 84
Interesting developments for AGU:
Angus & Ross PLC
12 January 2006
Completion of Black Angel pre-feasibility study
Economic case established for re-opening the mine
Global warming exposes 'massive sulphide' ore body visible on surface
Up-side potential to be established by 2006 drilling programme
Angus and Ross plc announces that mining consultancy Wardell Armstrong
International (WAI) Limited has completed a pre-feasibility study of the
potential of its Black Angel zinc lead project in Greenland, ahead of a planned
intense drilling programme in the 2006 season.
Commenting on the report, Chairman Robin Andrews said:
'The report establishes the economic case for re-opening the Black Angel mine.
There is further substantial potential in the area and we look forward with
anticipation to a successful conclusion to the 2006 exploration programme.'
The study establishes an economic case for reopening of the mine, based on
proven mineable ore reserves of 1.7 Mt of 9.7% zinc, 3.1% lead and 21g/t silver
contained largely in the pillars of the old mine. Using current metal prices
this base case indicates a commercial project with a Net Present Value of
US$52M (using a 10% discount rate) and an IRR of 35%.
The study also highlights the potential for finding additional ore in the
vicinity of the mine. If an additional 1.3 Mt of mill feed at similar grades
can be identified, this would result in the project NPV increasing to US$189M
with an IRR of 56%.
Wardell Armstrong International reports that:
'There are significant and encouraging signs that satellite deposits and mine
resources can provide additional ore for extraction. A re-interpretation of
the regional geology of Black Angel mine and the SouthLakesregion may lead to
additional tonnage from satellite deposits being sourced. The project has a
favourable outlook.'
The company is currently planning a drilling programme in order to delineate
the additional tonnage, having the advantage of records from 160,000 metres of
previous drilling. The prime targets include a significant outcrop of massive
sulphide ore uncovered over the last 15 years as the South Lakes glacier
retreated over 250m - a result of global warming - as well as six other
showings of ore. Grab samples from this outcrop returned grades of 32% zinc and
20% lead.
queen1
- 13 Jan 2006 14:50
- 30 of 84
Up 26% on today's news.
markusantonius
- 18 Jan 2006 01:55
- 31 of 84
About time too, Queeny! BTW are we still friends after last year's banter on a different thread? :o)
queen1
- 18 Jan 2006 09:54
- 32 of 84
That would depend on whether or not you manage to get my name right I guess.
markusantonius
- 01 Mar 2006 00:35
- 33 of 84
Apologies, your Royal Highness! But what's in a name, after all, dear?
queen1
- 01 Mar 2006 09:15
- 34 of 84
Now I've heard of quick-witted replies but 6 weeks for that???!!!
markusantonius
- 01 Mar 2006 23:06
- 35 of 84
Well you normally email me privately, Queenie (with a torrent of derogatory personal insults) but I notice you have withdrawn your contact details for some particular reason...??? Anyway "better late than never!", your RH, as they say. :o)
queen1
- 02 Mar 2006 08:41
- 36 of 84
Why on earth are you cluttering up this thread with your nastiness markusantonius? Holders of AGU do not want to read your drivel. Let's stick to the share if that's possible as there's been a lot happening recently that's worthy of proper comment.
markusantonius
- 02 Mar 2006 14:46
- 37 of 84
I am somewhat confused, Queenie? There's a huge difference between "nastiness" and plain ole good English "banter", my dear. We both play for the same side here so chill. Anyway I see you are discussing MPF with all your Fan Club - interesting thread! I may get some myself - any advice?
queen1
- 02 Mar 2006 19:15
- 38 of 84
If you could spell "comedy" markusantonius you'd be dangerous. You're obviously not the slightest bit interested in MPF but take a look anyway. The evidence speaks for itself. A wonder share.