Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


hewittalan6 - 22 Aug 2006 10:13 - 19226 of 27111

Thanks garyble.
I knew my physics wasn't up to it!!
I'd got as far as working out that If I Gs'd a cat with Starpol 3000, I could see the cat, so Schrodinger was an arse.
Alan

garyble - 22 Aug 2006 10:18 - 19227 of 27111

Well that's my penny's worth.

I've edited it a little.

Got to pop off to meet some chaps to look over a project for which we sent a letter of intent last week. I've kept them waiting for 10 mins so far, but they have arrived an hour early!

Nothing to do with SEO, but funny coincidence. Letter of intent last week, and we're about to place the order today.

Tonyrelaxes - 22 Aug 2006 10:25 - 19228 of 27111

Garyble, sounds like they are eager. Profitez-en!

Chiva20 - 22 Aug 2006 10:30 - 19229 of 27111

My god 3.9p!!! My deepest condolences, thank god I sold a year ago I never dreamt it was going to reside here a year later. Really feel for you guys and fingers crossed this recovers. You should have that drink in Donny all the same.

aldwickk - 22 Aug 2006 11:50 - 19230 of 27111

21 Aug'06 - 12:43 - 65082 of 65115


I tried telling them it was old technology yonks ago, but would they listen?

I worked in the electronics industry in RF applications for years, including modules for the stealth bomber, eurofighter, naval systems, missile systems, etc, etc, - although it's not food packaging, the underlying technology is the same - & RF is a total dog to work with, & the electronic components are very expensive.

Ultrasonics is easy by comparison & much cheaper on the component front

hewittalan6 - 22 Aug 2006 11:57 - 19232 of 27111

Not convinced. Its all in the past tense.
Silicon chips were expensive a few years ago and now they almost give 'em away.
The xerographic process was a dog to work with, but is now very simple and easy to work on.
The same argument could have been put forward, circa 1950, for keeping with pen and paper rather than these new fangled calculating engine thingys.
times change.
The real question is; If the ultrasonic stuff is as good as GS, why have the likes of Asda / WM never shown any interest? Why is it not utilised to a greater degree?
Convincing on the face of it, but a little thought shows it to be the same old news trotted out.
I remain unmoved. Everyone else can make their own minds up.
Alan

hewittalan6 - 22 Aug 2006 12:03 - 19233 of 27111

Looking at the link, kindly posted, other questions spring to mind.
Why are most applications only rated as good not excellent? Why do they mention that the chart does not refer to the strength of the seal? Is it becasue in amny areas it is weak? Why do they offer other technologies for areas that ultrasound cannot package, is there a problem with it?
See. Its easy to put a negative slant on anything, even the companys own advertising material.
alan

kimoldfield - 22 Aug 2006 12:06 - 19234 of 27111

I researched Branson some time ago and was not worried that it would affect SEO's business; for 'green' production SEO have the best all-encompassing machine. Some interesting questions on the FAQ section on Branson's site though:-

Q. Will my horn run on any machine?
Q. What kind of horn should be used for insertion?
Q. Why does my tool heat up?
Q. What types of coatings are available for horns?

kim

Edited name Branson not Benson!

tweenie - 22 Aug 2006 12:08 - 19235 of 27111

aldwickk - 22 Aug 2006 11:54 - 19231 of 19233
http://www.branson-plasticsjoin.com/applications_packaging.asp

As you can see does'nt work with PET. Is only 'good' with half other stuff and involves purchase of new machinery that can only be specialised.
It's pants ..........aldwick....please tell me you own loads LOL.

hewittalan6 - 22 Aug 2006 12:13 - 19236 of 27111

Aye, aye.
Aldwickks fan club has turned up ;-)
alan

tweenie - 22 Aug 2006 12:16 - 19237 of 27111

"me and my shadow".

oblomov - 22 Aug 2006 13:55 - 19238 of 27111


Ald(getting on my)wickk

'Ultrasonics is easy by comparison & much cheaper on the component front '

Why have you only just told us that? You could have told us (and ASDA/WM/PERSECO) last year and saved us all a lot of time and money!

soul traders - 22 Aug 2006 14:16 - 19239 of 27111

Re "Alan,

Ultrasonics: High frequency sound waves {speed of sound through the medium}
Radio frequency [Greenseal]: High frequency electromagnetic waves {speed of light} "


So Greenseal can be packaged faster ???? ;o)

And if it's packaged at a distance, do you see it packed before you hear it?

hewittalan6 - 22 Aug 2006 14:18 - 19240 of 27111

More to the point, if they can get it just a little faster, they can package next years crops, this year!!!
And how much money can be saved, cos according to E=MC2, as something hits light speed it gets infinitely heavy, so a gram of Salmon will weigh huge amounts and can be sold for a fortune.
It only gets better!!
Alan

soul traders - 22 Aug 2006 14:19 - 19241 of 27111

Forget Salmon - they should be packing Beluga Caviar!

Buy buy buy !!!!!! :o) LMAO

Mad Pad - 22 Aug 2006 14:42 - 19242 of 27111

Glad to see we havn't all lost our sense of homour,so we don't see ultrasonics as a threat ,good.

tweenie - 22 Aug 2006 15:17 - 19243 of 27111

seo gone blue!
don't worry normal service will be resumed.
An rns in morning promising 'jam tomorrow' should rectify the situation.
LOL

rpaco - 22 Aug 2006 16:45 - 19244 of 27111

However at the speed of light, time slows to nothing so all degradation in the product will cease thus eliminating the need for packaging. So one merely has to keep the fridge at C (Speed of light) for things to last for ever. Obviously it will therefore not need plugging in, thus eliminating the need for an infinitely long cable. Are we using the general or the special theory today? Or are you into strings?

hewittalan6 - 22 Aug 2006 16:51 - 19245 of 27111

Wow.
in the space of a day we appear to have invented the classical einsteinian physics fridge.
The problem now is that if it is classical, it cannot also be quantum, embracing the uncertainty principle. though fridges must be quantum cos they obey Schrodingers cat theory. Until we open the door we cannot be certain whether the light is on or off.
It therefore appears that this fridge cannot work in our limited 4 dimensions.
I am going away to work out a Grand unified fridge theory.
Alan
Register now or login to post to this thread.