Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


Tonyrelaxes - 23 Aug 2006 07:16 - 19271 of 27111

Well, tomorrow was fun.
What's happening yesterday?

KEAYDIAN - 23 Aug 2006 07:55 - 19272 of 27111

Any cheaper second class Kim?

hewittalan6 - 23 Aug 2006 07:57 - 19273 of 27111

After all that science stuff, wouldn't it be spooky if we got an update about Quantum?

soul traders - 23 Aug 2006 10:13 - 19274 of 27111

Did I start all this yesterday with my innocent (and rather stupid) comment about things sealing faster with RF?

Talk about a butterfly flapping its wings in Frankfurt and causing a storm in the ether . . .

Clearly we have managed to get time to stand still because:

SEO Bid: 3.76p Offer: 3.9p Change: 0


kimoldfield - 23 Aug 2006 10:14 - 19275 of 27111

Yes Keaydian, 23p second class but then I won't get it until 2 days ago instead of yesterday.
Alan, this thread has gone spooky enough already!
kim

kimoldfield - 23 Aug 2006 10:16 - 19276 of 27111

If we all start running in the same direction, but on the spot, the world will start to spin the other way and SEO will be 25p again in no time.
kim

stockdog - 23 Aug 2006 10:41 - 19277 of 27111

The final word may be Heisenberg's who stated in his uncertainty principle (and I paraphrase slightly here) that you cannot tell the value of a company and its share price at the same time.

Applied to SEO, and borrowing from Bohr's theory of complementarity (so elegantly summarised above), it means broadly speaking you cannot tell the time when the company will have a valuable share price.

In answer to Aldwick's question above, I hope to succeed to a relative very shortly, but it's a dog's life.

sd

hewittalan6 - 23 Aug 2006 10:47 - 19278 of 27111

I'm gonna put one of those blue plaques on my house saying "Heisenburg might have been born here".

stockdog - 23 Aug 2006 10:48 - 19279 of 27111

Why? What did he do? Was he distantly related to Heisenberg?

Surely it should say, "Heisenberg probably lived here, but we don't know when".

hewittalan6 - 23 Aug 2006 11:02 - 19280 of 27111

How do you know it was spelled like that. Are you certain?????

Mad Pad - 23 Aug 2006 11:06 - 19281 of 27111

Sorry I ever mentioned ultrasonics now BOOM BOOM

hewittalan6 - 23 Aug 2006 11:07 - 19282 of 27111

Never mind. Its the only thing on this thread that has reached so much concord!!!

Mad Pad - 23 Aug 2006 11:37 - 19283 of 27111

Concorde,supersonic BOOM BOOM.

tweenie - 23 Aug 2006 11:51 - 19284 of 27111

Apparantely, boffins have managed to slow light down from 300 million metres per second to 91 metres per second. It's called 'slow' light.
Theres a halo of it around SEO headquarters, slowly dissipating.
Obvioulsly this distortion of the time/space continuum is the only sane explanation as to who seo are have taken sooooo long to get deals.

hewittalan6 - 23 Aug 2006 11:55 - 19285 of 27111

Ridiculous. Light doesn't travel at 300 million metres per second.
If it went that fast we wouldn't be able to see it!!
Scientists need a course in clear thinking, instead of this quantum continuinuinuum stuff and messing about with the fabric of the universe.

kimoldfield - 23 Aug 2006 12:28 - 19286 of 27111

I switched my study light on 30 minutes ago and it hasn't moved at all, thus proving that light doesn't travel.
kim

automatic - 23 Aug 2006 12:30 - 19287 of 27111

SEO was once on this BB but perhaps that was tomorrow.
Question, would the NED of SEO ( Filkin) i think, have to ok the RNSs that are put out by SEO , i have read on BB that she won't stand for any (crap, or porky pies) if this is true it would be nice to get some kind of statement from her as to the real position of SEO

tweenie - 23 Aug 2006 13:00 - 19288 of 27111

automatic.
Having been clearly shown by interlects greater than mine, that light infact does not move and therefore all reality is a myth.
I can only conclude that therefore the NED you seek, is clearly incased in a field of dark matter and it will take a valiant cruader who champions enlightenment and truth to valiantly fight their way through the labyrinth of deceit and unlock this RNS you speak off, thus allowing the truth to be spoken once more across this barren landscape......................

automatic - 23 Aug 2006 13:07 - 19289 of 27111

thanks tweenie, i have e/mailed Captain Kirk of the star ship Enterprise perhaps he can find her for me

Oilywag - 23 Aug 2006 13:20 - 19290 of 27111

If you are serious about contacting Elizabeth Filkin, then why don't you try: elizabeth.filkin@stanelco.co.uk or variations of that.

Let us know if the e-mail is returned undelivered.

The oily one
Register now or login to post to this thread.