bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Mad Pad
- 23 Aug 2006 11:37
- 19283 of 27111
Concorde,supersonic BOOM BOOM.
tweenie
- 23 Aug 2006 11:51
- 19284 of 27111
Apparantely, boffins have managed to slow light down from 300 million metres per second to 91 metres per second. It's called 'slow' light.
Theres a halo of it around SEO headquarters, slowly dissipating.
Obvioulsly this distortion of the time/space continuum is the only sane explanation as to who seo are have taken sooooo long to get deals.
hewittalan6
- 23 Aug 2006 11:55
- 19285 of 27111
Ridiculous. Light doesn't travel at 300 million metres per second.
If it went that fast we wouldn't be able to see it!!
Scientists need a course in clear thinking, instead of this quantum continuinuinuum stuff and messing about with the fabric of the universe.
kimoldfield
- 23 Aug 2006 12:28
- 19286 of 27111
I switched my study light on 30 minutes ago and it hasn't moved at all, thus proving that light doesn't travel.
kim
automatic
- 23 Aug 2006 12:30
- 19287 of 27111
SEO was once on this BB but perhaps that was tomorrow.
Question, would the NED of SEO ( Filkin) i think, have to ok the RNSs that are put out by SEO , i have read on BB that she won't stand for any (crap, or porky pies) if this is true it would be nice to get some kind of statement from her as to the real position of SEO
tweenie
- 23 Aug 2006 13:00
- 19288 of 27111
automatic.
Having been clearly shown by interlects greater than mine, that light infact does not move and therefore all reality is a myth.
I can only conclude that therefore the NED you seek, is clearly incased in a field of dark matter and it will take a valiant cruader who champions enlightenment and truth to valiantly fight their way through the labyrinth of deceit and unlock this RNS you speak off, thus allowing the truth to be spoken once more across this barren landscape......................
automatic
- 23 Aug 2006 13:07
- 19289 of 27111
thanks tweenie, i have e/mailed Captain Kirk of the star ship Enterprise perhaps he can find her for me
Oilywag
- 23 Aug 2006 13:20
- 19290 of 27111
If you are serious about contacting Elizabeth Filkin, then why don't you try: elizabeth.filkin@stanelco.co.uk or variations of that.
Let us know if the e-mail is returned undelivered.
The oily one
tweenie
- 23 Aug 2006 13:38
- 19291 of 27111
http://socplas.org/membersonly/industry/symposium2006/cooper.pdf
SEO in america peddling goods (old- JUNE-2006 )
the interesting bit is the silage wrap use for starpol.
Why has'nt this been pushed big time?
(apologies for being ON TOPIC)
lol
automatic
- 23 Aug 2006 13:38
- 19292 of 27111
Oilywag
E/mail sent & returned undelivered, so how do you contact her??
Tonyrelaxes
- 23 Aug 2006 13:50
- 19293 of 27111
Auto
Try variations such as efilkin@ or ef@ or put dots or dashes in etc. The @stanelco.co.uk part is fine.
Otherwise Investor Relations dept at SEO should pass on emails to her, their address is investor-relations@stanelco.co.uk
automatic
- 23 Aug 2006 14:11
- 19294 of 27111
Have ended up sending to investor relations, don't think i will get a satisfactory awnser ,we will see
automatic
- 23 Aug 2006 14:31
- 19295 of 27111
Thank you for your email. We have noted your comments.
As we are a publicly quoted company, we are unable to comment on specific questions due to stock exchange rules. However, if we have any news to release to the market, it will be made through an RNS announcement. Our website will be automatically updated with this information".
Best regards
Sylvia
hewittalan6
- 23 Aug 2006 14:41
- 19296 of 27111
Did you ask them about Pauli's exclusion principle as it applies to hawking radiation from rotating black holes?
greekman
- 23 Aug 2006 14:44
- 19297 of 27111
At a risk of getting back to semi SEO (not complaining as there was nothing else to talk about. A think tank of SEO holders could probably change the world (good or bad though, that's the question).
Re funding.....In my opinion the best way to go would be a short term loan.
Of course not knowing the full situation SEO are in, a short term loan may not be the least expensive.
Short term loan.
Advantages Quick to arrange, no dilution of sp.
Disadvantages Probable high cost of interest.
Funding re shares issue.
Advantages No interest cost to SEO.
Disadvantages Takes time to arrange, dilution of total shares value, cost re procedure, would probably take the sp down further.
Funding re a bond issue.
Advantages Similar to share issue.
Disadvantages Takes time to arrange, cost re procedure, and would anyone take them up.
Selling off an r&d product.
Can't see any consideration re this as if SEO are as confident in their products as they appear, it would defeat the object (leaving aside the cig filters) that we could do with a further update on.
The above are just my thoughts outloud, any opinions welcome.
garyble
- 23 Aug 2006 14:56
- 19300 of 27111
June 16 presentation states:
"Microwavable & dual-ovenable blends to be developed"
Boys in the back room {Bohr, Planck, Einstein, Schrodinger, Heisenberg.......and Masterson} working tirelessly!
aldwickk
- 23 Aug 2006 15:35
- 19301 of 27111
If you are not going to talk about SEO, take a look at my latest investment.
http://www.rentechinc.com/
aldwickk
- 23 Aug 2006 15:47
- 19302 of 27111
22. 8. 06
Stanelco PLC
Daily Commentary
Our system posted a SELL-IF today. The previous BUY recommendation was made on 23.06.2006 (60) days ago, when the stock price was 8.5000. Since then SEO has fallen -54.12% .
The SELL-IF alert is still valid. A bearish confirmation today however is denied. The pattern is not yet rejected since the day was not a long white candlestick day. The market is indecisive so keep up the good work and continue to do your homework digesting all available information around.
The final judgment about the evolving pattern waits the next session. Either the bearish alert will be confirmed by one of the valid bearish confirmation criteria or the bearish alert will be void and invalid. It will also be seen if we significantly erred in our previous BUY signal. So a warning is in order. A confirmation in the next session means that the signal failed. You might lose a significant amount in this case. The following guidelines, however, may protect you from further losses.
It is still your duty to check the bearish confirmation criteria when the next session opens. Reminding briefly, a black candlestick with a downward gap, a black candlestick closing below the previous close and a long black candlestick with a big upward gap is sufficient to confirm the SELL-IF alert though with a one day delay. Sell your shares in any of these cases by respecting the benchmarks. In any other case, simply ignore the SELL-IF alert. The next session is the last chance we allow for bearish confirmation. A confirmation failure renders the assumed bearish pattern totally invalid and starts the process of searching for a new pattern.
The bearish alert is still valid and recent market tendency is bearish, but new short positions may be considered only in case of a valid bearish confirmation.