Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


tweenie - 23 Aug 2006 13:00 - 19288 of 27111

automatic.
Having been clearly shown by interlects greater than mine, that light infact does not move and therefore all reality is a myth.
I can only conclude that therefore the NED you seek, is clearly incased in a field of dark matter and it will take a valiant cruader who champions enlightenment and truth to valiantly fight their way through the labyrinth of deceit and unlock this RNS you speak off, thus allowing the truth to be spoken once more across this barren landscape......................

automatic - 23 Aug 2006 13:07 - 19289 of 27111

thanks tweenie, i have e/mailed Captain Kirk of the star ship Enterprise perhaps he can find her for me

Oilywag - 23 Aug 2006 13:20 - 19290 of 27111

If you are serious about contacting Elizabeth Filkin, then why don't you try: elizabeth.filkin@stanelco.co.uk or variations of that.

Let us know if the e-mail is returned undelivered.

The oily one

tweenie - 23 Aug 2006 13:38 - 19291 of 27111

http://socplas.org/membersonly/industry/symposium2006/cooper.pdf

SEO in america peddling goods (old- JUNE-2006 )

the interesting bit is the silage wrap use for starpol.

Why has'nt this been pushed big time?

(apologies for being ON TOPIC)
lol

automatic - 23 Aug 2006 13:38 - 19292 of 27111

Oilywag
E/mail sent & returned undelivered, so how do you contact her??

Tonyrelaxes - 23 Aug 2006 13:50 - 19293 of 27111

Auto
Try variations such as efilkin@ or ef@ or put dots or dashes in etc. The @stanelco.co.uk part is fine.
Otherwise Investor Relations dept at SEO should pass on emails to her, their address is investor-relations@stanelco.co.uk

automatic - 23 Aug 2006 14:11 - 19294 of 27111

Have ended up sending to investor relations, don't think i will get a satisfactory awnser ,we will see

automatic - 23 Aug 2006 14:31 - 19295 of 27111

Thank you for your email. We have noted your comments.

As we are a publicly quoted company, we are unable to comment on specific questions due to stock exchange rules. However, if we have any news to release to the market, it will be made through an RNS announcement. Our website will be automatically updated with this information".

Best regards

Sylvia

hewittalan6 - 23 Aug 2006 14:41 - 19296 of 27111

Did you ask them about Pauli's exclusion principle as it applies to hawking radiation from rotating black holes?

greekman - 23 Aug 2006 14:44 - 19297 of 27111

At a risk of getting back to semi SEO (not complaining as there was nothing else to talk about. A think tank of SEO holders could probably change the world (good or bad though, that's the question).
Re funding.....In my opinion the best way to go would be a short term loan.

Of course not knowing the full situation SEO are in, a short term loan may not be the least expensive.
Short term loan.
Advantages Quick to arrange, no dilution of sp.
Disadvantages Probable high cost of interest.

Funding re shares issue.
Advantages No interest cost to SEO.
Disadvantages Takes time to arrange, dilution of total shares value, cost re procedure, would probably take the sp down further.

Funding re a bond issue.
Advantages Similar to share issue.
Disadvantages Takes time to arrange, cost re procedure, and would anyone take them up.

Selling off an r&d product.
Can't see any consideration re this as if SEO are as confident in their products as they appear, it would defeat the object (leaving aside the cig filters) that we could do with a further update on.
The above are just my thoughts outloud, any opinions welcome.

soul traders - 23 Aug 2006 14:49 - 19298 of 27111

Greekman, if SEO go down the road of issuing a bond then I think a convertible would be most likely, as holders are going to want some substantial upside in return for the credit risk.

Unfortunately that brings you back to an issue of dilution, although if the bonds were convertible at, say, 10p then that would mitigate the dilutive effect considerably compared with current SP.

soul traders - 23 Aug 2006 14:51 - 19299 of 27111

garyble - 23 Aug 2006 14:56 - 19300 of 27111

June 16 presentation states:

"Microwavable & dual-ovenable blends to be developed"

Boys in the back room {Bohr, Planck, Einstein, Schrodinger, Heisenberg.......and Masterson} working tirelessly!

aldwickk - 23 Aug 2006 15:35 - 19301 of 27111

If you are not going to talk about SEO, take a look at my latest investment.

http://www.rentechinc.com/

aldwickk - 23 Aug 2006 15:47 - 19302 of 27111

22. 8. 06

Stanelco PLC
Daily Commentary


Our system posted a SELL-IF today. The previous BUY recommendation was made on 23.06.2006 (60) days ago, when the stock price was 8.5000. Since then SEO has fallen -54.12% .



The SELL-IF alert is still valid. A bearish confirmation today however is denied. The pattern is not yet rejected since the day was not a long white candlestick day. The market is indecisive so keep up the good work and continue to do your homework digesting all available information around.

The final judgment about the evolving pattern waits the next session. Either the bearish alert will be confirmed by one of the valid bearish confirmation criteria or the bearish alert will be void and invalid. It will also be seen if we significantly erred in our previous BUY signal. So a warning is in order. A confirmation in the next session means that the signal failed. You might lose a significant amount in this case. The following guidelines, however, may protect you from further losses.

It is still your duty to check the bearish confirmation criteria when the next session opens. Reminding briefly, a black candlestick with a downward gap, a black candlestick closing below the previous close and a long black candlestick with a big upward gap is sufficient to confirm the SELL-IF alert though with a one day delay. Sell your shares in any of these cases by respecting the benchmarks. In any other case, simply ignore the SELL-IF alert. The next session is the last chance we allow for bearish confirmation. A confirmation failure renders the assumed bearish pattern totally invalid and starts the process of searching for a new pattern.

The bearish alert is still valid and recent market tendency is bearish, but new short positions may be considered only in case of a valid bearish confirmation.



hangon - 23 Aug 2006 16:05 - 19303 of 27111

So it's a Sell, then?
-Looking at the sp it seems something nasty is about to happen....where did my 24p go - it vanished.
Good job I only invested petty-cash.
New "breakthrough" technologies are a bit like this, you just never know....

tweenie - 23 Aug 2006 16:15 - 19304 of 27111

only a sell in your universe.
thankfully in the dimension I inhabit, the petty cash i invested was recouperated several times over.
New "breakthrough" technologies are a bit like this, you just never know....

zscrooge - 23 Aug 2006 17:21 - 19305 of 27111

LOL Enjoyed the erudition - gallows humour.

bosley - 23 Aug 2006 17:35 - 19306 of 27111

"erudition "? is that posh for "bullshit"? :) fascinating discussion.

explosive - 23 Aug 2006 19:04 - 19307 of 27111

Now theres a word I'd have expected to see posted by cynic! LOL....

Aldwick great SELL-IF post, did you by any chance encounter a beer monkey last night?
Register now or login to post to this thread.