Moneylender
- 23 Jan 2003 08:09
blinger
- 23 Nov 2005 18:29
- 1933 of 2262
Quote
"An extraordinary, or special resolution is passed by a majority of not less than 75%
of the votes, cast in person or by proxy -----
Section 378(1) and (2) of the Companies Act 1989
.....
This and a hundred other legal traps await.Whom is paying for the Groups QC I wonder at 1,000 an hour- oh and ML that sneer on your and yuffs` face at anyone talking sense will soon be a grimace,
have a nice Thanksgiving.
snappy
- 23 Nov 2005 18:57
- 1934 of 2262
I thought it was a two thirds majority but it would appear that it is a three quarters.
So you will need Steig (and the rest of the Stream Theory 80 million issue) to vote himself and Dilts off the board. Hardly likely unless of course the payoff is worth more than the shares themselves.
The action group will have a real struggle
blinger
- 23 Nov 2005 19:10
- 1935 of 2262
Exactly, and if he hasn`t got a 5 year `golden handshake contract` i`ll be very suprised, a phyrric victory if ever.
Perhaps the `cardies` will scrape up the severance pay- oops silly me they will anyway from the GEM drawdown to pay for it and another -25% dilution.
They are all dreamers,
yuff
- 24 Nov 2005 10:01
- 1936 of 2262
Ml
They haven't got a clue.
Seems strange that SW thinks he can call an EGM and vote DL out with just 10 % of the share capital, eventually, but when the boot is on the other foot olie thinks that the shareholders, with 50 % more shares than SW and crew, can't do the same.
Someone is mis informed here and I I would think SW would have a better idea than olie and snappy about company law.
SW gambled that his 40m shares would see him through , simple fact is he didn't reckon on the shareholders getting way more shares than him at the EGM, either he does a deal or he's gone uinless he buys another 20m shares that will see the price rise nicely if he does that.
Amazing how olie thinks its one rule for SW and another fopr shareholders perhaps olie has forgot that SW is also a shareholder, once SW is voted off the board the next move at the AGM will be to look at his remuneration package which will then be based on performance afterall if he was able to try and justify a pay rise at the last agm the baord will certainly be able to justify apay decrease at the next agm.
Ps olie how right were you last time when the price was 4/5.5 you forecast 3p, only problem was it hit 28p before 3p, you huff and you puff but you won't beat the yuff. LOL
Gail The Chin
- 24 Nov 2005 11:35
- 1937 of 2262
yuff
Why do you try and convince that fool oile or blinger or even yuff when he tried to pretend he was you.
Granted olie is good with words but sadly he is driven by a misguided perception that he can read and understand markets better than anyone else.
He has no idea what westerberg holds-what I can tell you is tha Westerbergs ally on the Tad board holds nothing and those ex ST employees have long sold out.
I have cast my vote to support DL.
Olie cannot cast a vote as he is not a shareholder.
Why he continues to stalk these free bb's is beyond me.
The man seems to have a mental illness-very very sad.
Moneylender
- 24 Nov 2005 14:25
- 1938 of 2262
GTC
Ollie has been ill for a long long time.
M
yuff
- 24 Nov 2005 17:22
- 1939 of 2262
Ml & GLC
I think you are both right, obviously blinger will return with his sidekick Snappy.
LOL
blinger
- 24 Nov 2005 17:25
- 1940 of 2262
Well one thing for sure ML, you yuffer/puffer and the chinless wonder make me feel very sick, in fact I feel the nausea now .
Chinless, that is exactly what I said you berk, NOBODY knows how many shares Westerberg has gotten behind him .
I just hope that you three get caught up in the costs, now that really WILL be funny.
Buy a book yuffer and join the real world of Company Law- try Farrars` Company Law,for a start, although I don`t think they have it in talking books form yet, ask chinless wonder to read it to you - looks as though it knows a bit about the law.
As for retrospectively changing Westerbergs Conditions of Employment- well yuff it shows you for the clown you are- geddoutahere man and get real .
ROTFFLMFAO!!!!!!!!@yuffer/puffer and gang and the EGM
ps I see that the Action Group organisers are getting desperate now, it appears it has just dawned on them they need 75% of the vote, clueless.
Kivver
- 24 Nov 2005 17:49
- 1941 of 2262
I keep coming on this thread hoping to find out something about the company (tad), oh well dream on!
blinger
- 24 Nov 2005 17:54
- 1942 of 2262
No this is the thread where adolescents insult their superiors, pretending they are experts in buying shares and then watching them fall by 96%.
Without a doubt it is peopled by such experts, listen to yuff and gang, read their posts and see the truth, its a revelation .
I bet Steig is enjoying his turkey and having a huge laugh at The Action Men, I know I am.
blinger
- 24 Nov 2005 17:59
- 1943 of 2262
WE ARE ALONE BUT UNAFRAID, WHO NEEDS THE OTHE 74.999%???
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Love the bluies ML, M&S were they ?, or S&M????????-Oh and boxing gloves yuffer- same old problem, never mind,no hard `feelings` there then?????????
blinger
- 24 Nov 2005 21:02
- 1944 of 2262
YUFF,
Don`t get legal advice before you get involved
PLEASE!!!!!
Good boy!!!!!!!!!!
blinger
- 24 Nov 2005 21:38
- 1945 of 2262
Last post tonight
ML can you and the remaining `shirt yuffters` please confirm your TAD holdings,Paul Tibble
is desperate for the last 74.9%
ROTFFLMFAO!!!!!!!!
snappy
- 25 Nov 2005 14:53
- 1947 of 2262
The loose association of Tadpole shareholders trying to remove Steig of the dump from the board.
Spot the yuff competition
Spot which one is yuff in the picture and post your entry on this thread.
Rules:
A grand prize of 1 Tadpole share will be issued to the winner (excludes brokers costs and stamp duty fees)
Members of the Tadpole shareholders association and their famliy members are not permitted to enter.
The judges decision is final and correspodence will only be entered into if considered humourous.
The competition organiser reserves the right to substitute the grand prize for a sherbert dip or a two pence piece.
snappy
- 25 Nov 2005 18:16
- 1948 of 2262
you can huff and puff but you can't spot the yuff!
(hint - walking carpet with a bad smile)
blinger
- 25 Nov 2005 19:00
- 1949 of 2262
Very quiet here today, I wonder if yuffer &co. have a had a 5 subsidised meeting with a small town solicitor, the costs are mounting- and TAD ` aint going to pay them- over to the Action Men Team
blinger
- 25 Nov 2005 19:08
- 1950 of 2262
blinger
- 25 Nov 2005 20:57
- 1951 of 2262
The Judges in the TAD Trial- from left to right- Feb 2010
L The Right honourable J .Lennon (deceased)
L+1 The Right honourable W.Connolly (109)
L+2 The Right honourable M. Douglas (113)
L+3 The Right honourable M.Parkinson (119)
In between the latter two is a shadowy news reader. knighted but nameless(107)
The yuff and puff brigade are out on bail
superrod
- 26 Nov 2005 00:16
- 1952 of 2262
Kivver
this aint the place to find any discussion wrt tad. until some news ( good or bad ) comes out, all you will find is the bitching of the last 50 or so posts. ( find another whipping boy olie ).
if you really have such a paltry amount invested ( not intended to be condescending ), hang on and hope for a miracle. it has happened many times in tads history. i estimate you have 1000 shares ( more or less ). no imminent danger of tad going bust ( not to say it wont happen ), so unless you are desperate fof 20 .........